Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:55:39.729Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Letters to the Editors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2007

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Letters to the Editors
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2006

Dear Sirs

In their paper in the June issue of this journal, Aydemir et al.Reference Aydemir, Tezer, Borman, Bodur and Unal1 assert that, in their series, the application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improved the quality of life of patients with tinnitus. The study did not, however, control for the substantial placebo effect of this treatment.

This placebo effect has been well demonstrated in other studies in which the reduction of pain has been assessed,Reference Conn, Marshall, Yadav, Daly and Jaffer2 including a meta-analysis of low back painReference Brosseau, Milne, Robinson, Marchand, Shea and Wells3 in which no greater effect of real transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation compared with sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation could be shown. It is also important to note that, in studies of the use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in tinnitus which used sham transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as a placebo, no significant difference was demonstrated between the active and placebo treatments.Reference Dobie, Hoberg and Rees4, Reference Thedinger, Karlsen and Schack5

Owing to the fact that this treatment has a considerable placebo effect, we suggest caution when ascribing the effects seen after application of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation to the treatment itself and not to the placebo effect that it generates.

D D Pothier,

C-L Bredenkamp*,

From the Royal United Hospital, Bath, and *SignalTrust UK, London, UK.

Author's reply

Dear Sirs

Pothier and Bredenkamp criticise our study for the lack of placebo control. However, our specific aim was to show that transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves the quality of life of patients with tinnitus, rather than to evaluate its efficacy, which has been well demonstrated previously.Reference Steenerson and Cronin1Reference Engelberg and Bauer4 Although a placebo effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation cannot be entirely ruled out, our study provides evidence that suppression of this troubling symptom by such treatment is accompanied by improvement in the quality of the patient's life.

M S Tezer,

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

References

1 Aydemir, G, Tezer, MS, Borman, P, Bodur, H, Unal, A. Treatment of tinnitus with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improves patients' quality of life. J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:442–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Conn, IG, Marshall, AH, Yadav, SN, Daly, JC, Jaffer, M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation following appendicectomy: the placebo effect. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1986;68:191–2Google ScholarPubMed
3 Brosseau, L, Milne, S, Robinson, V, Marchand, S, Shea, B, Wells, G et al. Efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a meta-analysis. Spine 2002;27:596603CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Dobie, RA, Hoberg, KE, Rees, TS. Electrical tinnitus suppression: a double-blind crossover study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;95:319–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Thedinger, BS, Karlsen, E, Schack, SH. Treatment of tinnitus with electrical stimulation: an evaluation of the Audimax Theraband. Laryngoscope 1987;97:33–7Google Scholar