Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:38:16.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In defence of transpalatal, transpalatal-circumaxillary (transpterygopalatine) and transpalatal-circumaxillary-sublabial approaches to lateral extensions of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2016

A Mishra*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India
S C Mishra
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India Visiting Professor at Nepalgunj Medical College, Nepal
V Verma
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India
H P Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India
S Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India
A M Tripathi
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India
B Patel
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India
V Singh
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Anupam Mishra, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, King George Medical University, Lucknow, India E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background:

Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma often presents with lateral extensions. In countries with limited resources, selection of a cost-effective and least morbid surgical approach for complete excision is challenging.

Methods:

Sixty-three patients with juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma, with lateral extensions, underwent transpalatal, transpalatal-circumaxillary (transpterygopalatine) or transpalatal-circumaxillary-sublabial approaches for resection. Clinico-radiological characteristics, tumour volume and intra-operative bleeding were recorded.

Results:

The transpalatal approach was suitable for extensions involving medial part of pterygopalatine fossa; transpalatal-circumaxillary for extensions involving complete pterygopalatine fossa, with or without partial infratemporal fossa; and transpalatal-circumaxillary-sublabial for extensions involving complete infratemporal fossa, even cheek or temporal fossa up to zygomatic arch. Haemorrhage was greatest with the transpalatal-circumaxillary-sublabial approach, followed by transpalatal approach and transpalatal-circumaxillary approach (1212, 950 and 777 ml respectively). Tumour size (volume) was greatest with the transpalatal-circumaxillary approach, followed by transpalatal-circumaxillary-sublabial approach and transpalatal approach (40, 34 and 29 mm3). There was recurrence in three cases and residual disease in two cases. Long-term morbidity included small palatal perforation (n = 1), trismus (n = 1) and atrophic rhinitis (n = 2).

Conclusion:

These modified techniques, performed with endoscopic assistance under hypotensive anaesthesia, without embolisation, offer a superior option over other open procedures with regard to morbidity and recurrences.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Chew, CT. Nasopharynx (the postnasal space). In: Kerr, AG, Groves, J, eds. Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology: Rhinology (Volume IV), 5th edn. London: Butterworth, 1987 Google Scholar
2 Kamel, R. Transnasal endoscopic surgery in juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. J Laryngol Otol 1996;110:962–86Google Scholar
3 Radkowski, D, McGill, T, Healy, GB, Ohlms, L, Jones, DT. Angiofibroma: changes in staging and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122:122–9Google Scholar
4 Mishra, SC, Shukla, GK, Bhatia, N, Pant, MC. A rational classification of angiofibromas of the postnasal space. J Laryngol Otol 1989;103:912–16Google Scholar
5 Sardana, DS. Nasopharyngeal fibroma: extension into cheek. Arch Otolaryngol 1965;81:584–8Google Scholar
6 Mishra, SC, Shukla, GK, Bhatia, N, Pant, MC. Angiofibromas of the postnasal space: a critical appraisal of various therapeutic modalities. J Laryngol Otol 1991;105:547–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Howard, DJ, Lloyd, G, Lund, V. Recurrence and its avoidance in juvenile angiofibroma. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1509–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Cansiz, H, Güvenç, MG, Sekercioğlu, N. Surgical approaches to juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2006;34:38 Google Scholar
9 Howard, DJ, Lund, VJ. The midfacial degloving approach to sinonasal disease. J Laryngol Otol 1992;106:1059–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Lowlicht, RA, Jassin, B, Kim, M, Sasaki, CT. Long-term effect of Le Fort I osteotomy for resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma on maxillary growth and dental sensation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:923–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Benjamin, S, Stella, C, Ziv, G, Chaushu, G, Fliss, DM. Effects of the subcranial approach on facial growth and development. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:2732 Google Scholar
12 Lewark, TM, Allen, GC, Chowdhury, K, Chan, KH. Le Fort I osteotomy and skull base tumors: a pediatric experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:1004–8Google Scholar
13 Janecka, IP, Nuss, DW, Sen, CN. Facial translocation approach to the cranial base. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1991;53:193–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Gates, GA. The lateral facial approach to the nasopharynx and infratemporal fossa. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;99:321–5Google Scholar
15 Zhang, M, Garvis, W, Linder, T, Fisch, U. Update on the infratemporal fossa approaches to nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1717–23CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Browne, JD, Jacob, SL. Temporal approach for resection of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1287–93Google Scholar
17 Bales, C, Kotapka, M, Loevner, LA, Al-Rawi, M, Weinstein, G, Hurst, R et al. Craniofacial resection of advanced nasopharyngeal angiofibroma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:1071–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18 Haines, SJ, Duvall, AJ. Transzygomatic and transpalatal excision of juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma with intracranial extension. In: Sekhar, LN, Janecka, IP, eds. Surgery of Cranial Base Tumors. New York: Raven Press, 1993;477–84Google Scholar
19 Andrews, JC, Fisch, U, Valavanis, A, Aeppli, U, Makek, MS. The surgical management of extensive nasopharyngeal angiofibromas with the infratemporal fossa approach. Laryngoscope 1989;99:429–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20 Fisch, U. The infratemporal fossa approach for nasopharyngeal tumours. Laryngoscope 1983;93:3644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Mickey, B, Close, LG, Schaefer, SD, Samson, D. A combined frontotemporal and lateral infratemporal fossa approach to the skull base. J Neurosurg 1988;68:678–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22 Herman, B, Bublik, M, Ruiz, J, Younis, R. Endoscopic embolization with onyx prior to resection of JNA: a new approach. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2010;75:53–6Google Scholar
23 Mishra, A. True bilateral nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: report and review. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and Head & Neck 2015 [in press]Google Scholar
24 Banhiran, W, Casiano, RR. Endoscopic sinus surgery for benign and malignant nasal and sinus neoplasm. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;13:50–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25 Iovanescu, G, Ruja, S, Cotulbea, S. Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibroma: Timisoara ENT Department's experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:1186–9Google Scholar
26 McCombe, A, Lund, VJ, Howard, DJ. Recurrence in juvenile angiofibroma. Rhinology 1990;28:97102 Google Scholar
27 Lloyd, G, Howard, D, Phelps, P, Cheesman, A. Juvenile angiofibroma: the lessons of 20 years of modern imaging. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113:127–34CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed