Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:17:08.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immediate selective laryngeal reinnervation in vagal paraganglioma patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2018

M Mat Baki
Affiliation:
Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
P Clarke
Affiliation:
Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
M A Birchall*
Affiliation:
Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, UK Ear Institute, University College London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Prof Martin Anthony Birchall, Professorial Unit, Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, 330 Grays Inn Road, London WC1X 8DA, UK E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective

This prospective case series aimed to present the outcomes of immediate selective laryngeal reinnervation.

Methods

Two middle-aged women with vagal paraganglioma undergoing an excision operation underwent immediate selective laryngeal reinnervation using the phrenic nerve and ansa cervicalis as the donor nerve. Multidimensional outcome measures were employed pre-operatively, and at 1, 6 and 12 months post-operatively.

Results

The voice handicap index-10 score improved from 23 (patient 1) and 18 (patient 2) at 1 month post-operation, to 5 (patient 1) and 1 (patient 2) at 12 months. The Eating Assessment Tool 10 score improved from 20 (patient 1) and 24 (patient 2) at 1 month post-operation, to 3 (patient 1) and 1 (patient 2) at 12 months. There was slight vocal fold abduction observed in patient one and no obvious abduction in patient two.

Conclusion

Selective reinnervation is safe to perform following vagal paraganglioma excision conducted on the same side. Voice and swallowing improvements were demonstrated, but no significant vocal fold abduction was achieved.

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Prof M A Birchall takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper.

References

1Lozano, FS, Gómez, JL, Mondillo, MC, González-Porras, JR, González-Sarmiento, R, Muñoz, A. Surgery of vagal paragangliomas: six patients and review of literature. Surg Oncol 2008;17:281–7Google Scholar
2Gilmer-Hill, HS, Kline, DG. Neurogenic tumors of the cervical vagus nerve: report of four cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 2000;46:1498–503Google Scholar
3Miller, RB, Boon, MS, Atkins, JP, Lowry, LD. Vagal paraganglioma: the Jefferson experience. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:482–7Google Scholar
4Urquhart, AC, Johnson, JT, Myers, EN, Schechter, GL. Glomus vagale. Laryngoscope 1994;104:440–5Google Scholar
5Netterville, JL, Jackson, C, Miller, FR, Wanamaker, JR, Glasscock, ME. Vagal paraganglioma: a review of 46 patients treated during a 20-year period. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:1133–40Google Scholar
6Fang, TJ, Tam, YY, Courey, MS, Li, HY, Chiang, HC. Unilateral high vagal paralysis: relationship of the severity of swallowing disturbance and types of injuries. Laryngoscope 2011;121:245–9Google Scholar
7Bielamowicz, S, Gupta, A, Sekhar, LN. Early arytenoid adduction for vagal paralysis after skull base surgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:346–51Google Scholar
8Lamarre, ED, Lorenz, RR, Milstein, C, Scharpf, J. Laryngeal reinnervation after vagal paraganglioma resection: a case report. Am J Otolaryngol 2011;32:171–3Google Scholar
9Woodson, GE. Spontaneous laryngeal reinnervation after recurrent laryngeal or vagus nerve injury. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2007;116:5765Google Scholar
10Rosen, CA, Lee, AS, Osborne, J, Zullo, T, Murry, T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope 2004;114:1549–56Google Scholar
11Mat Baki, M, Wood, G, Alston, M, Ratcliffe, P, Sandhu, G, Rubin, JS et al. Reliability of OperaVOX against Multidimensional Voice Program (MDVP). Clin Otolaryngol 2015;40:22–8Google Scholar
12Crumley, RL, Horn, K, Clendenning, D. Laryngeal reinnervation using the split-phrenic nerve-graft procedure. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1980;88:159–64Google Scholar
13Crumley, RL, Izdebski, K. Voice quality following laryngeal reinnervation by ansa hypoglossi transfer. Laryngoscope 1986;96:611–16Google Scholar
14Rosen, CA. Stroboscopy as a research instrument: development of a perceptual evaluation tool. Laryngoscope 2005;115:423–8Google Scholar
15Lee, WT, Milstein, C, Hicks, D, Akst, LM, Esclamado, RM. Results of ansa to recurrent laryngeal nerve reinnervation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;136:450–4Google Scholar
16Lorenz, RR, Esclamado, RM, Teker, AM, Strome, M, Scharpf, J, Hicks, D et al. Ansa cervicalis-to-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis for unilateral vocal fold paralysis: experience of a single institution. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008;117:40–5Google Scholar
17Marina, MB, Marie, JP, Birchall, MA. Laryngeal reinnervation for bilateral vocal fold paralysis. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;19:434–8Google Scholar
18Remacle, M, Eckel, HE. Surgery of Larynx and Trachea. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010Google Scholar
19Orestes, MI, Chhetri, DK, Berke, G. Selective reinnervation for bilateral vocal cord paralysis using the superior laryngeal nerve. Laryngoscope 2015;125:2547–50Google Scholar