Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message

Login Alert

Cancel
Log in
×
×
Register
Log In
(0) Cart
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Logo for Cambridge Core from Cambridge University Press. Click to return to homepage.
Cited by
  • Crossref logo 11
  • Google Scholar logo
Crossref Citations
Crossref logo
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
de Andrade, Kelly Cristina Lira de Carvalho Leal, Mariana Muniz, Lilian Ferreira de Lemos Menezes, Pedro de Albuquerque, Katia Maria Gomes and Carnaúba, Aline Tenório Lins 2014. The importance of electrically evoked stapedial reflex in cochlear implant✩✩Please cite this article as: Andrade KCL, Leal MC, Muniz LF, Menezes PL, Albuquerque KMG, Carnaúba ATL. The importance of electrically evoked stapedial reflex in cochlear implant. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80:68-77.. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, Vol. 80, Issue. 1, p. 68.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Rajati, Mohsen Ghassemi, Mohammad Mehdi Bakhshaee, Mehdi Tale, Mohammad Reza and Tayarani, Hamid 2014. Effect of stylet removal on neural response telemetry and stapedial reflex thresholds during cochlear implantation. Auris Nasus Larynx, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 255.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Bergeron, Francois and Hotton, Mathieu 2015. Comparison of eSRTs and comfort levels in users of Digisonic SP cochlear implants. Cochlear Implants International, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 110.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Van Eeckhoutte, Maaike Wouters, Jan and Francart, Tom 2018. Electrically-evoked auditory steady-state responses as neural correlates of loudness growth in cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, Vol. 358, Issue. , p. 22.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Weiss, Bernhard G. Söchting, Friederike Bertlich, Mattis Busch, Martin Blum, Jenny Ihler, Friedrich and Canis, Martin 2018. An Objective Method to Determine the Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Threshold During Cochlea Implantation. Otology & Neurotology, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. e5.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Nogueira, Waldo Krüger, Benjamin Büchner, Andreas and Lopez-Poveda, Enrique 2019. Contralateral suppression of human hearing sensitivity in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users. Hearing Research, Vol. 373, Issue. , p. 121.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Guida, M. Falcioni, M. Di Lella, F. Negri, M. Fagnani, E. and Vincenti, V. 2019. Stimulation séquentielle multi-électrodes versus stimulation mono-électrode pour évoquer le réflexe stapédien pendant l’implantation cochléaire : corrélation avec le niveau maximal de confort. Annales françaises d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie et de Pathologie Cervico-faciale, Vol. 136, Issue. 3, p. 169.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Guida, M. Falcioni, M. Di Lella, F. Negri, M. Fagnani, E. and Vincenti, V. 2019. Multi-electrode sequential versus single electrode stimulation to elicit the stapedial reflex during cochlear implantation: Correlation with maximum comfort level. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Diseases, Vol. 136, Issue. 3, p. 169.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Weiss, Nora M. Óvári, Attila Oberhoffner, Tobias Demaret, Laurent Bicer, Atabek Schraven, Sebastian Ehrt, Karsten Dahl, Rüdiger Schneider, Armin and Mlynski, Robert 2021. Automated detection of electrically evoked stapedius reflexes (eSR) during cochlear implantation. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Vol. 278, Issue. 6, p. 1773.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Егоров , Алексей Игоревич and Глуховский , Евгений Михайлович 2021. Кохлеарная имплантация у новорожденных: сложности и особенности. Естественные и Технические Науки, p. 99.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Müller, Joachim Molenda, Carmen and Polterauer, Daniel 2024. Aktuelle Trends und Entwicklungen bei der Cochlea-Implantat-Versorgung. Sprache · Stimme · Gehör, Vol. 48, Issue. 01, p. 22.
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
Google Scholar Citations

View all Google Scholar citations for this article.

×
Cambridge University Press

Our Site

  • Accessibility
  • Contact & Help
  • Legal Notices

Our Platforms

  • Cambridge Core
  • Cambridge Open Engage
  • Cambridge Higher Education

Our Products

  • Journals
  • Books
  • Elements
  • Textbooks
  • Courseware

Join us online

Please choose a valid location.

  • Rights & Permissions
  • Copyright
  • Privacy Notice
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies Policy
Cambridge University Press 2024

Cancel
Confirm
×

Save article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

How reliable is visual assessment of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex threshold during cochlear implant surgery, compared with tympanometry?
  • Volume 125, Issue 3
  • H W Pau (a1), K Ehrt (a1), T Just (a1), U Sievert (a1) and R Dahl (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215110002392
Please provide your Kindle email.
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

How reliable is visual assessment of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex threshold during cochlear implant surgery, compared with tympanometry?
  • Volume 125, Issue 3
  • H W Pau (a1), K Ehrt (a1), T Just (a1), U Sievert (a1) and R Dahl (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215110002392
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

How reliable is visual assessment of the electrically elicited stapedius reflex threshold during cochlear implant surgery, compared with tympanometry?
  • Volume 125, Issue 3
  • H W Pau (a1), K Ehrt (a1), T Just (a1), U Sievert (a1) and R Dahl (a1)
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215110002392
Available formats Please select a format to save.
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Contents help
Close Contents help

- No HTML tags allowed
- Web page URLs will display as text only
- Lines and paragraphs break automatically
- Attachments, images or tables are not permitted

Please enter your response.

Your details

Email help
Close Email help

Your email address will be used in order to notify you when your comment has been reviewed by the moderator and in case the author(s) of the article or the moderator need to contact you directly.

Please enter a valid email address.
You have entered the maximum number of contributors

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? * Conflicting interests help

Close Conflicting interests help

Please list any fees and grants from, employment by, consultancy for, shared ownership in or any close relationship with, at any time over the preceding 36 months, any organisation whose interests may be affected by the publication of the response. Please also list any non-financial associations or interests (personal, professional, political, institutional, religious or other) that a reasonable reader would want to know about in relation to the submitted work. This pertains to all the authors of the piece, their spouses or partners.