Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T11:55:24.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ENT run through pilot: a questionnaire survey of 23 trainees

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 January 2021

E Heward  and
B N Kumar
E Heward*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
B N Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, UK
*
Author for correspondence: Mr Elliot Heward, Department of ENT, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary, Wigan Lane, WiganWN1 2NN, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

The ENT run through pilot was introduced in 2018 to improve early recruitment to the specialty. This study aimed to understand what makes a successful interview applicant and the experience of the run through trainees during the specialty trainee one and specialty trainee two years.

Method

A questionnaire survey was sent to all ENT run through trainees.

Results

Twenty-three trainees responded. Of the successful candidates, 74 per cent held additional degrees prior to application. The median core surgical interview rank was 27 (range: 3–174). Trainees felt that being on the run through pilot had increased ENT trainer engagement.

Conclusion

The ENT run through posts are highly competitive, and holding an additional degree may improve applicant success. The pilot programme has been successful by increasing trainer engagement at this critical stage of training. These results will enable development of the pilot programme and provide valuable information for those applying to an ENT run through post.

Keywords

OtolaryngologySurveys and QuestionnairesPilot Projects
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 135 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 74 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Mr E Heward takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Powell, J, Cooles, FAH, Carrie, S, Paleri, V. Is undergraduate medical education working for ENT surgery? A survey of UK medical school graduates. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:896–905CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, R, Steven, R, Richard, , Haddow, K. Declining applications to surgical specialist training. RCS Bull 2017;90:142–4Google Scholar
Harries, RL, Williams, AP, Ferguson, HJM, Mohan, HM, Beamish, AJ, Gokani, VJ et al. The future of surgical training in the context of the ‘Shape of Training’ Review: consensus recommendations by the Association of Surgeons in Training. Int J Surg 2016;36:S5–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Health Education England. Run through pilot in otolaryngology. In: https://www.nwpgmd.nhs.uk/sites/default/files/Run%20Through%20Pilot%20in%20Otolaryngology%20v2.pdf [28 May 2020]Google Scholar
Arwyn-Jones, J, Bhalla, S, Acharya, V, Beegun, I, Awad, Z, Tolley, N. Specialty showcase days: can specialist careers workshops improve the consideration of ENT for medical students? Adv Med Educ Pract 2019;10:877–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Health Education England. Specialty recruitment competition ratios 2019. In: https://specialtytraining.hee.nhs.uk/Portals/1/Competition%20Ratios%202019_1.pdf [28 May 2020]Google Scholar
Manjaly, J, Radford, P. Who is succeeding at ENT ST3 England National Selection? Ann R Coll Surg Engl (suppl) 2014;96:1–5Google Scholar
Social Mobility Commission. Elitism in Britain, 2019. In: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/elitism-in-britain-2019 [11 Aug 2020]Google Scholar