Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-12T22:28:28.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Endoscopic septoplasty: literature review, surgical techniques and retrospective analysis at the University Hospitals Leuven

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2019

S Vandenbroeck  and
M Jorissen
S Vandenbroeck*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
M Jorissen
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Belgium
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Sebastian Vandenbroeck, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 33, 3000 Leuven, Belgium E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +32 16 33 23 35
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic septoplasty is an alternative approach for a deviated nasal septum. Since its introduction, numerous techniques have been developed, each with its own advantages and limitations. A literature review is presented, along with our experience with endoscopic spur resection.

Methods

The Medline and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant literature, and the records of all patients undergoing endoscopic spur resection at the University Hospitals Leuven between 2001 and 2015 were reviewed.

Results and conclusion

Endoscopic septoplasty offers improved visualisation and the option of limited flap dissection, which are particularly helpful when dealing with isolated spurs, posterior deviations and revision septoplasty. It enhances teaching and improves surgical transition to endoscopic sinus surgery. Reported success and complication rates are comparable to those seen in traditional approaches. Endoscopic spur resection, as conducted at the University Hospitals Leuven, was shown to be a quick, safe and efficient technique when dealing with isolated septal spurs, especially when combined with endoscopic sinus surgery.

Keywords

Nasal SeptumNasal Surgical ProceduresNatural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery
Type
Review Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 133 , Issue 4 , April 2019 , pp. 262 - 268
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr S Vandenbroeck takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

1Orlandi, RR. A systematic analysis of septal deviation associated with rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 2010;120:1687–95Google Scholar
2Harrison, L, Jones, NS. Intranasal contact points as a cause of facial pain or headache: a systematic review. Clin Otolaryngol 2013;38:8–22Google Scholar
3Chung, BJ, Batra, PS, Citardi, MJ, Lanza, DC. Endoscopic septoplasty: revisitation of the technique, indications, and outcomes. Am J Rhinol 2007;21:307–11Google Scholar
4Fettman, N, Sanford, T, Sindwani, R. Surgical management of the deviated septum: techniques in septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42:241–52, viiiGoogle Scholar
5Aaronson, NL, Vining, EM. Correction of the deviated septum: from ancient Egypt to the endoscopic era. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014;4:931–6Google Scholar
6Killian, G. The submucous window resection of the nasal septum. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1905;14:363–93Google Scholar
7Freer, OT. The correction of deflections of the nasal septum with a minimum of traumatism. JAMA 1902;XXXVIII:636–42Google Scholar
8Lanza, DC, Kennedy, DW, Zinreich, SJ. Nasal endoscopy and its surgical applications. In: Lee, KJ, ed. Essential Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, 5th edn. New York: Medical Examination, 1991;373–87Google Scholar
9Stammberger, H. Special problems. In: Hawke, M., ed. Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery: The Messerklinger Technique. Philadelphia: BC Decker, 1991;432–3Google Scholar
10Sathyaki, DC, Geetha, C, Munishwara, GB, Mohan, M, Manjuanth, K. A comparative study of endoscopic septoplasty versus conventional septoplasty. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;66:155–61Google Scholar
11Paradis, J, Rotenberg, BW. Open versus endoscopic septoplasty: a single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;40(suppl 1):S28–33Google Scholar
12Hwang, PH, McLaughlin, RB, Lanza, DC, Kennedy, DW. Endoscopic septoplasty: indications, technique, and results. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999;120:678–82Google Scholar
13Getz, AE, Hwang, PH. Endoscopic septoplasty. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;16:26–31Google Scholar
14Vanclooster, C, Jorissen, M. Endoscopic septal spur resection in combination with endoscopic sinus surgery. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 1998;52:335–9Google Scholar
15Nakayama, T, Okushi, T, Yamakawa, S, Kuboki, A, Haruna, S. Endoscopic single-handed septoplasty with batten graft for caudal septum deviation. Auris Nasus Larynx 2014;41:441–5Google Scholar
16Pons, Y, Champagne, C, Genestier, L, Ballivet de Régloix, S. Endoscopic septoplasty: tips and pearls. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2015;132:353–6Google Scholar
17Trimarchi, M, Bellini, C, Toma, S, Bussi, M. Back-and-forth endoscopic septoplasty: analysis of the technique and outcomes. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012;2:40–4Google Scholar
18de Sousa, A, Iniciarte, L, Levine, H. Powered endoscopic nasal septal surgery. Acta Med Port 2005;18:249–55Google Scholar
19Kim, JY, Choi, G, Kwon, JH. The application of an ultrasonic bone aspirator for septoturbinoplasty. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:893–6Google Scholar
20Raynor, EM. Powered endoscopic septoplasty for septal deviation and isolated spurs. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:410–12Google Scholar
21De Sousa Fontes, A, Sandrea Jimenez, M, Chacaltana Ayerve, RR. Endoscopic septoplasty in primary cases using electromechanical instruments: surgical technique, efficacy and results. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 2013;64:317–22Google Scholar
22Prepageran, N, Lingham, OR. Endoscopic septoplasty: the open book method. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;62:310–12Google Scholar
23Hyun, DW, Kim, YS, Lee, JG, Yoon, JH, Kim, CH. Full-thickness horizontal mucosal incision to correct high septals deviation: our experience in ten patients. Clin Otolaryngol 2012;37:223–8Google Scholar
24Kim, BH, Kim, JY, Park, JS, Kang, SH, Lim, DJ, Yu, MS. Combined use of scoring incisions and 2-octylcyanoacrylate adhesive during endonasal septoplasty to correct cartilaginous deviations. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2014;28:209–13Google Scholar
25Wang, T, Han, D, Zhang, L, Zang, H, Li, Y, Liu, C. A modified septoplasty with three high tension lines resection. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:593–9Google Scholar
26Mantovani, M, Mazzola, RF, Cioccarelli, MG. The back-and-forth septoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996;97:40–4Google Scholar
27Samad, I, Stevens, HE, Maloney, A. The efficacy of nasal septal surgery. J Otolaryngol 1992;21:88–91Google Scholar
28Siegel, NS, Gliklich, RE, Taghizadeh, F, Chang, Y. Outcomes of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:228–32Google Scholar
29Fjermedal, O, Saunte, C, Pedersen, S. Septoplasty and/or submucous resection? 5 years nasal septum operations. J Laryngol Otol 1988;102:796–8Google Scholar
30Sipila, J, Suonpaa, J. A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1997;254:387–90Google Scholar
31Jessen, M, Malm, L. The importance of nasal airway resistance and nasal symptoms in the selection of patients for septoplasty. Rhinology 1984;22:157–64Google Scholar
32Dommerby, H, Rasmussen, OR, Rosborg, J. Long-term results of septoplastic operations. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 1985;47:151–7Google Scholar
33Holmstrom, M, Kumlien, J. A clinical follow-up of septal surgery with special attention to the value of preoperative rhinomanometric examination in the decision concerning operation. Clin Otolaryngol 1988;13:115–20Google Scholar
34Gandomi, B, Bayat, A, Kazemei, T. Outcomes of septoplasty in young adults: the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness study. Am J Otolaryngol 2010;31:189–92Google Scholar
35Champagne, C, Ballivet de Régloix, S, Genestier, L, Crambert, A, Maurin, O, Pons, Y. Endoscopic vs. conventional septoplasty: a review of the literature. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2016;133:43–6Google Scholar
36Ketcham, AS, Han, JK. Complications and management of septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2010;43:897–904Google Scholar
37Bloom, JD, Kaplan, SE, Bleier, BS, Goldstein, SA. Septoplasty complications: avoidance and management. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42:463–81Google Scholar
38Sautter, NB, Smith, TL. Endoscopic septoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2009;42:253–60, viiiGoogle Scholar
39Giles, WC, Gross, CW, Abram, AC, Greene, WM, Avner, TG. Endoscopic septoplasty. Laryngoscope 1994;104:1507–9Google Scholar
40Jessen, M, Ivarsson, A, Malm, L. Nasal airway resistance and symptoms after functional septoplasty: comparison of findings at 9 months and 9 years. Clin Otolaryngol 1989;14:231–4Google Scholar