Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T13:02:34.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of pre-operative mastoid pneumatisation on tympanoplasty success

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2022

Y M ElBeltagy ,
A M Askoura ,
D E A Hangal  and
A A Teaima Open the ORCID record for A A Teaima [Opens in a new window]
Y M ElBeltagy
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
A M Askoura
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
D E A Hangal
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
A A Teaima*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
*
Author for correspondence: Dr A Teaima, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Ramses street, Abasseya Square, Cairo11591, Egypt E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to compare the effect of pneumatised and non-pneumatised mastoid on the success of tympanoplasty in terms of rate of graft uptake and air–bone gap improvement.

Method

A comprehensive electronic search of PubMed Medline, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library was conducted in August 2020 for articles from 1990 to 2020. Selected studies were published in the English language, were conducted on human patients, were concerned with evaluating pre-operative mastoid pneumatisation on tympanoplasty success, were not laboratory studies and were not opinion studies. Five studies were included with 178 patients in the pneumatised group and 97 patients were included in the non-pneumatised group. Comparison between both groups was performed in terms of graft uptake rate and air–bone gap improvement.

Results

Although the pneumatised group showed better graft uptake rate than the non-pneumatised group, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the success rate of tympanoplasty.

Conclusion

Pneumatisation of the mastoid does not significantly affect the success rate of tympanoplasty.

Keywords

TympanoplastyMastoid PneumatizationTympanic Membrane
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 136 , Issue 6 , June 2022 , pp. 500 - 504
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr A Teaima takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Bayramoglu, I, Ardic, FN, Kara, CO, Ozüer, MZ, Katircioğlu, O, Topuz, B. Importance of mastoid pneumatization on secretory otitis media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1997;40:60–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, DH, Shin, JH, Lee, DC. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of paranasal sinuses and mastoid air cell system using computed tomography in pediatric population. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2012;76:1642–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellucci, RJ. Selection of cases and classification of tympanoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1989;22:911–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrew, BM, Ackson, CG, Glasscock, ME 3rd. Impact of mastoidectomy on simple tympanic membrane perforation repair. Laryngoscope 2004;114:506–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amer, HS, El-Anwar, MW, Abdelhady, M, Abdulmonaem, G, Elgerby, KM. Effect of mastoid pneumatization on myringoplasty success: a radiological study. Indian J Otol 2017;23:104–7Google Scholar
Metin, M, Kaptan, ZK, Dogan, S, Yazici, H, Bayraktar, C, Gocmen, H et al. Effect of preoperative mastoid ventilation on tympanoplasty success. Int J Otolaryngol 2014:169123Google ScholarPubMed
Mohan, C, Sharma, S, Srivastava, A. Has mastoid pneumatization any bearing on tympanoplasty? Indian J Otol 2015;21:266–9Google Scholar
Sethi, A, Singh, I, Agarwal, AK, Sareen, D. Pneumatization correlated to myringoplasty and tubal function. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;57:283–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toros, SZ, Habesoglu, TE, Habesoglu, M, Bolukbasi, S, Naiboglu, B, Karaca, CT et al. Do patients with sclerotic mastoids require aeration to improve success of tympanoplasty? Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:909–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tumarkin, A. On the nature and vicissitudes of the accessory air spaces of the middle ear. J Laryngol Otol 1957;71:65–99CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmquist, J. Aeration in chronic otitis media. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sciences 1978;3:279–84CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colhoun, EN, O'Neill, G, Francis, KR, Hayward, C. A comparison between area and volume measurements of the mastoid air spaces in normal temporal bones. Clin Otolaryngol 1988;13:59–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graham, M, Brackmen, D. Acromegaly and the temporal bone. J Laryngol Otol 1978;92:275–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iino, Y, Imamura, Y, Hiraishi, M et al. Mastoid pneumatization in children with congenital cholesteatoma: an aspect of the formation of open-type and closed-type cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1071–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider-Arnold, M. Degree of pneumatization of the temporal bone and Meniere's disease; are they related? Am J Otolaryngol 1990;11:33–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, DH, Jun, BC, Kim, DG et al. Volume variation of mastoid pneumatization in different age groups: a study by three-dimensional reconstruction based on computed tomography images. Surg Radiol Anat 2005;27:37–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holmquist, J, Bergström, B. Eustachian tube function and size of the mastoid air-cell system in middle ear surgery. Scand Audiol 1977;6:87–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonding, P. Tympanoplasty in children. Acta Otolaryngol 1988;106:199–20110.3109/00016488809106410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palva, T, Virtanen, H. Ear surgery and mastoid air cell system. Arch Otolaryngol 1981;107:71–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siedentop, KH, Hamilton, LR, Osenar, SB. Predictability of tympanoplasty results. Preoperative eustachian tube function and size of mastoid air cell system. Arch Otolaryngol 1972;95:146–50Google ScholarPubMed
Gimenez, F, Marco-Algarra, J, Carbonell, R, Morant, A, Cano, S. Prognostic factors in tympanoplasty: a statistical evaluation. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord) 1993;114:335–7Google ScholarPubMed
Holmquist, J. Size of mastoid air cell system in relation to healing after myringoplasty and to eustachian tube function. Acta Otolaryngologica 1970;69:89–93CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackler, RK, Schindler, RA. Role of the mastoid in tympanic membrane reconstruction. Laryngoscope 1984;94:495–500CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yegin, Y, Çelik, M, Şimşek, BM, Olgun, B, Karahasanoğlu, A, Çolak, C et al. Impact of the degree of the mastoid pneumatization on cartilage type 1 tympanoplasty success. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:695–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balyan, FR, Celikkanat, S, Aslan, A, Taibah, A, Russo, A, Sanna, M. Mastoidectomy in non cholesteatomatous chronic suppurative otitis media: is it necessary? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;117:592–510.1016/S0194-5998(97)70038-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, WJ. Experimental results do not support a gas reserve function for the mastoid. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2000;52:229–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miura, M, Takahashi, H, Honjo, I, Hasebe, S, Tanabe, M. Influence of the gas exchange function through the middle ear mucosa on the development of sniff-induced middle ear diseases. Laryngoscope 1998;108:683–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed