Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T19:34:25.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of epidural anaesthesia and size of spinal needle on post-operative hearing loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Semih Öncel*
Affiliation:
1st Department of OtorhinolaryngologyState HospitalYeşilyurt, Izmir, Turkey.
Levent Hasegeli
Affiliation:
Department of AnaesthesiologyState Hospital, Yeşilyurt, Izmir, Turkey.
M. Zafer Uguz
Affiliation:
1st Department of OtorhinolaryngologyState HospitalYeşilyurt, Izmir, Turkey.
Serdar Savaci
Affiliation:
Department of AnaesthesiologyState Hospital, Yeşilyurt, Izmir, Turkey.
Kazim Önal
Affiliation:
1st Department of OtorhinolaryngologyState HospitalYeşilyurt, Izmir, Turkey.
Semiramis Oyman
Affiliation:
Department of AnaesthesiologyState Hospital, Yeşilyurt, Izmir, Turkey.
*
Mithatpaşa Caddesi, No. 424/2, Izmir, Turkey.

Abstract

Forty-five patients who were to undergo elective urological operations were evaluated. In the pre-operative period and on the third or fourth post-operative day audiometry was performed. Epidural anaesthesia was performed in 15 cases, spinal anaesthesia was performed in 15 cases with 25 G needles, and in 15 cases with 22 G needles. No statistically significant hearing loss was observed in the post-operative period compared to preoperative period in the epidural anaesthesia group. In the post-operative period, the hearing loss observed in the 25 G-spinal anaesthesia group was significantly (P<0.01) less than that seen in the 22 G group. None of the patients had headache after spinal anaesthesia. It was concluded that pure tone audiometry is a more sensitive indicator of cerebrospinal fluid leakage than post-operative headache.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collins, V. J. (1976) Principles of anaesthesiology. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, 690–7Google Scholar
Dittmann, M.Schafer, H. G., Ulrich, J., Bond-Tayler, W. (1988) Anatomical re-evaluation of lumbar dura mater with regard to postspinal headache. Effect of dural puncture. Anaesthesia, 43: 635–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fog, J., Wang, L. P., Sundberg, A., Mucchiano, C. (1990) Hearing loss after spinal anaesthesia is related to needle size. Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 70: 517–22Google Scholar
Lee, C. M. (1990) Letters to the editor. Hearing loss after spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia and Analgesia, 71: 561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panning, B., Mehler, D., Lehnhart, E. (1983) Transient hearing loss following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 42: 1258–63Google Scholar
Wang, L. P. (1986) Transient low-frequency hypoacusia after spinal anaesthesia. Lancet, ii: 582Google Scholar
Wang, L. P., Fog, J., Bove, M. (1987) Transient hearing loss following spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia, 42: 1258–63CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed