Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T09:20:06.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dexmedetomidine improves the quality of the operative field for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: systematic review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2015

K Snidvongs ,
W Tingthanathikul ,
S Aeumjaturapat  and
S Chusakul
K Snidvongs*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok
W Tingthanathikul
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
S Aeumjaturapat
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok
S Chusakul
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Kornkiat Snidvongs, Department of Otolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand Fax: +66 2 252 7787 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Intra-operative bleeding diminishes visualisation during functional endoscopic sinus surgery and can cause unfavourable outcomes. Dexmedetomidine is a potent alpha-2 agonist, with sympatholytic effects. This systematic review aimed to assess whether dexmedetomidine decreases intra-operative bleeding and improves operative field quality.

Methods:

All randomised, controlled trials that assessed the ability of dexmedetomidine to provide good operative fields for functional endoscopic sinus surgery were identified from Medline and Embase. The outcomes of interest were: operative field quality, intra-operative bleeding, operative time and adverse events.

Results:

Five studies (254 patients) met the inclusion criteria. When compared to saline, dexmedetomidine improved the quality of the operative field. The operative time was similar between groups. When compared to other drugs, dexmedetomidine was as effective as esmolol and remifentanil. There were no adverse incidents.

Conclusion:

Dexmedetomidine is beneficial in providing good visibility during functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Controlled hypotensive anaesthesia with this medicine decreases intra-operative bleeding and enhances surgical field quality.

Keywords

DexmedetomidineParanasal SinusesSinus Surgery
Type
Review Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 129 , Supplement S3 , July 2015 , pp. S8 - S13
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Boezaart, AP, van der Merwe, J, Coetzee, A. Comparison of sodium nitroprusside- and esmolol-induced controlled hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Can J Anaesth 1995;42:373–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Degoute, CS, Ray, MJ, Manchon, M, Dubreuil, C, Banssillon, V. Remifentanil and controlled hypotension; comparison with nitroprusside or esmolol during tympanoplasty. Can J Anaesth 2001;48:20–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Degoute, CS, Dubreuil, C, Ray, MJ, Guitton, J, Manchon, M, Banssillon, V et al. Effects of posture, hypotension and locally applied vasoconstriction on the middle ear microcirculation in anaesthetized humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 1994;69:414–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Degoute, CS. Controlled hypotension: a guide to drug choice. Drugs 2007;67:1053–76CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Pavlin, JD, Colley, PS, Weymuller, EA Jr, Van Norman, G, Gunn, HC, Koerschgen, ME. Propofol versus isoflurane for endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Otolaryngol 1999;20:96–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Elsharnouby, NM, Elsharnouby, MM. Magnesium sulphate as a technique of hypotensive anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2006;96:727–31CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Dal, D, Celiker, V, Ozer, E, Basgul, E, Salman, MA, Aypar, U. Induced hypotension for tympanoplasty: a comparison of desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2004;21:902–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Amaranath, L, Kellermeyer, WF Jr. Tachyphylaxis to sodium nitroprusside. Anesthesiology 1976;44:345–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Coursin, DB, Coursin, DB, Maccioli, GA. Dexmedetomidine. Curr Opin Crit Care 2001;7:221–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Gerlach, AT, Dasta, JF. Dexmedetomidine: an updated review. Ann Pharmacother 2007;41:245–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Carollo, DS, Nossaman, BD, Ramadhyani, U. Dexmedetomidine: a review of clinical applications. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2008;21:457–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Easley, RB. Sedation challenges in the pediatric ICU: is dexmedetomidine the solution? Indian Pediatr 2009;46:761–3Google ScholarPubMed
13Review Manager (RevMan) v. 5.1.6 ed [computer program]. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011Google Scholar
14Higgins, JP, Green, S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration (online), 2011Google Scholar
15Malhotra, SK, Kumar, S, Arora, S, Gupta, A. Effect of dexmedetomidine on the quality of surgical field and requirement of hypotensive agents during endoscopic sinus surgery under general anesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013;30:27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Gao, GJ, Xu, YY, Wang, B, Lv, HM, Yang, WY, Shang, Y. Feasibility of dexmedetomidine assisting sevoflurane for controlled hypotension in endoscopic sinus surgery [in Chinese]. Jie Fang Jun Yi Xue Za Zhi 2012;37:45–8Google Scholar
17Guven, DG, Demiraran, Y, Sezen, G, Kepek, O, Iskender, A. Evaluation of outcomes in patients given dexmedetomidine in functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2011;120:586–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Ke, J, Pen, X. The effect of dexmedetomidine on post-operative blood pressure after controlled hypotension in endoscopic sinus surgery [in Chinese]. Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2013;27:478–80Google ScholarPubMed
19Lee, J, Kim, Y, Park, C, Jeon, Y, Kim, D, Joo, J et al. Comparison between dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for controlled hypotension and recovery in endoscopic sinus surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013;122:421–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Shams, T, El Bahnasawe, NS, Abu-Samra, M, El-Masry, R. Induced hypotension for functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a comparative study of dexmedetomidine versus esmolol. Saudi J Anaesth 2013;7:175–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Fromme, GA, MacKenzie, RA, Gould, AB Jr, Lund, BA, Offord, KP. Controlled hypotension for orthognathic surgery. Anesth Analg 1986;65:683–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Jacobi, KE, Bohm, BE, Rickauer, AJ, Jacobi, C, Hemmerling, TM. Moderate controlled hypotension with sodium nitroprusside does not improve surgical conditions or decrease blood loss in endoscopic sinus surgery. J Clin Anesth 2000;12:202–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Eberhart, LH, Folz, BJ, Wulf, H, Geldner, G. Intravenous anesthesia provides optimal surgical conditions during microscopic and endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1369–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Manola, M, De Luca, E, Moscillo, L, Mastella, A. Using remifentanil and sufentanil in functional endoscopic sinus surgery to improve surgical conditions. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2005;67:83–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25Ayoglu, H, Yapakci, O, Ugur, MB, Uzun, L, Altunkaya, H, Ozer, Y et al. Effectiveness of dexmedetomidine in reducing bleeding during septoplasty and tympanoplasty operations. J Clin Anesth 2008;20:437–41CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Durmus, M, But, AK, Dogan, Z, Yucel, A, Miman, MC, Ersoy, MO. Effect of dexmedetomidine on bleeding during tympanoplasty or septorhinoplasty. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2007;24:447–53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Balaraju, TC, Pathan, R, Thomas, R, Kantha, S, Sheetal, D, Yogesh, B et al. A study of dexmedetomidine compared with midazolam for sedation in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 2013;4:185–9Google Scholar
28Ragab, A, El Shamaa, H, Ibrahim, M. Dexmedetomidine, morphine, propofol vs midazolam, morphine, propofol for conscious sedation in rhinoplasty under local anesthesia. A prospective, randomized study. Egyptian J Anaesth 2013;29:181–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar