Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:50:57.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Current conservative treatment of childhood chronic secretony otitis media

(A survey and discussion)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

John R. Cherry
John R. Cherry*
Affiliation:
London
*
Consultant Otolaryngologist, Beaumont Hospital, Slyne Road, Lancaster LA1 2JF.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A questionnaire on medical treatment of childhood secretory otitis was posted to all Consultant Otologists in the Thames Regions of the National Health Service. Questions dealt with indications for medical management, choice of treatment, and indications for omitting medical therapy in favour of immediate surgery, or giving no treatment at all. 86 questionnaires were completed. 81.4 per cent of respondents used medical treatment, but there was no consensus as to the drug or combination preferred. Oral decongestant preparations were the most popular. 87.1 per cent of users of medical therapy sometimes omitted it in favour of immediate surgery, most commonly because previous treatment by another practitioner appeared a failure. 63.1 per cent of all respondents left some cases completely untreated. The views of experienced otologists on the treatment of ‘glue ear’ vary widely, and there is no acceptable evidence to support any method of medical therapy. Large-scale trials are needed to clarify the position.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 100 , Issue 9 , September 1986 , pp. 1019 - 1026
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Casselbrandt, M. L., Brostoff, L. M., Cantekin, E. I., Flaherty, M. R., Doyle, W. J., Bluestone, C. D. and Fria, T. J. (1985) Otitis media with effusion in preschool children. Laryngoscope, 95: 428–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherry, J. R. (1985) Unpublished observations.Google Scholar
Editorial. (1982) Tympanostomy tubes. The Lancet, 1: 1107.Google Scholar
Elcock, H. W. and Lord, I. J. (1972) Bromhexine hydrochloride in chronic secretory otitis media—a clinical trial. British Journal of Clinical Practice, 26: 276–278.Google Scholar
Fraser, J. G., Mehta, M. and Fraser, P. M. (1977) The medical treatment of secretory otitis media. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 91: 757–765.Google Scholar
Marks, N. J., Mills, R. P. and Shaheen, O. H. (1981) A controlled trial of cotrimoxazole therapy in serous otitis media. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 95: 1003–1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marks, N. J., Mills, R. P. and Shaheen, O. H. (1983) Cotrimoxazole in the treatment of serous otitis. A follow up report. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 97: 213–215.Google Scholar
Pocock, S. J. (1985) Current issues in the design and interpretation of clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 290: 39–42.Google Scholar
Ramsden, R. T., Moffat, D. A., Gibson, W. P. R. and Jay, M. M. (1977) S-carboxymethylcysteine in the treatment of glue ear; a double-blind trial. Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 91: 847–851.Google Scholar
Taylor, P. H. and Dareshani, N. (1975) S-carboxymethylcysteine syrup in secretory otitis media. British Journal of Clinical Practice, 29: 177–180.Google Scholar
Watson, T. J. and Harrison, K. (1968) Long-term follow up chronic exudative otitis media. Proceedings of The Royal Society of Medicine, 62: 455–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar