Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Rickards, Field W
and
De Vidi, Sandra
1995.
Exaggerated hearing loss in noise induced hearing loss compensation claims in Victoria.
Medical Journal of Australia,
Vol. 163,
Issue. 7,
p.
360.
Davies, Rosalyn
Prashert, Deepak
and
O'Sullivant, Anne
1995.
An unusual case of deafness with speech impairment: lesson in diagnosis and management.
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology,
Vol. 109,
Issue. 11,
p.
1085.
Qiu, William W.
Stucker, Fred J.
Yin, Shengguang S.
and
Welsh, Louis W.
1998.
Current Evaluation of Pseudohypacusis: Strategies and Classification.
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology,
Vol. 107,
Issue. 8,
p.
638.
Cooper, J.
and
Lightfoot, G.
2000.
A Modified Pure Tone Audiometry Technique for Medico-Legal Assessment.
British Journal of Audiology,
Vol. 34,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Tsui, Betty
Wong, Lena L. N.
and
Wong, Eddie C. M.
2002.
Accuracy of cortical evoked response audiometry in the identification of non-organic hearing loss: Exactitud de la audiometría por respuestas corticales evocadas en la identificación de hipoacusia no orgánica.
International Journal of Audiology,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 6,
p.
330.
Hsu, W.-C.
Wu, H.-P.
and
Liu, T.-C.
2003.
Objective assessment of auditory thresholds in noise-induced hearing loss using steady-state evoked potentials.
Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences,
Vol. 28,
Issue. 3,
p.
195.
Balatsouras, Dimitrios G.
Kaberos, Antonis
Korres, Stavros
Kandiloros, Dimitrios
Ferekidis, Eleftherios
and
Economou, Constantinos
2003.
Detection of Pseudohypacusis: A Prospective, Randomized Study of the Use of Otoacoustic Emissions.
Ear & Hearing,
Vol. 24,
Issue. 6,
p.
518.
Tomlin, Dani
Rance, Gary
Graydon, Kelley
and
Tsialios, Ioanna
2006.
A comparison of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) and cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds in awake adult subjects.
International Journal of Audiology,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 10,
p.
580.
Lightfoot, Guy
and
Kennedy, Vicki
2006.
Cortical Electric Response Audiometry Hearing Threshold Estimation: Accuracy, Speed, and the Effects of Stimulus Presentation Features.
Ear & Hearing,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 5,
p.
443.
Yeung, Kammy N.K.
and
Wong, Lena L.N.
2007.
Prediction of hearing thresholds: Comparison of cortical evoked response audiometry and auditory steady state response audiometry techniques.
International Journal of Audiology,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 1,
p.
17.
Muller-Gass, Alexandra
Marcoux, André
Jamshidi, Parastoo
and
Campbell, Kenneth
2008.
The effects of very slow rates of stimulus presentation on event-related potential estimates of hearing threshold.
International Journal of Audiology,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 1,
p.
34.
Ikeda, Kazunari
Hayashi, Akiko
Matsuda, Osamu
and
Sekiguchi, Takahiro
2010.
An ignoring task improves validity of cortical evoked response audiometry.
NeuroReport,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 10,
p.
709.
Hsu, Ruey‐Fen
Chen, Shun‐Sheng
Lu, Sheng‐Nan
Ho, Chi‐Kung
and
Lin, Hsiu‐Fen
2011.
Dichotic multiple‐frequency auditory steady‐state responses in evaluating the hearing thresholds of occupational noise‐exposed workers.
The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 8,
p.
330.
Billings, Curtis J.
Papesh, Melissa A.
Penman, Tina M.
Baltzell, Lucas S.
and
Gallun, Frederick J.
2012.
Clinical Use of Aided Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials as a Measure of Physiological Detection or Physiological Discrimination.
International Journal of Otolaryngology,
Vol. 2012,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Kolkaila, Enaas A.
Emara, Afaf A.
and
Gabr, Takwa A.
2012.
Cortical auditory evoked potentials in children using hearing aids.
Audiological Medicine,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 3,
p.
132.
Basanets, A.V.
Shydlovskaya, T.A.
and
Gvozdetsky, V.A.
2014.
Problem of diagnostics of sensorineural deafness in Ukraine.
Ukrainian Journal of Occupational Health,
Vol. 2014,
Issue. 4,
p.
12.
Karawani, H.
Attias, J.
Shemesh, R.
and
Nageris, B.
2015.
Evaluation of noise‐induced hearing loss by auditory steady‐state and auditory brainstem‐evoked responses.
Clinical Otolaryngology,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 6,
p.
672.
Alanazi, Ahmad
Nicholson, Nannette
Atcherson, Samuel
and
Martin, Patti
2016.
THE HEARLAB CORTICAL TONE EVALUATION (CTE)
PROTOCOL: A CLINICAL FEASIBILITY STUDY.
Journal of Hearing Science,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 3,
p.
54.
Holt, Fred
and
Özdamar, Özcan
2016.
Effects of rate (0.3–40/s) on simultaneously recorded auditory brainstem, middle and late responses using deconvolution.
Clinical Neurophysiology,
Vol. 127,
Issue. 2,
p.
1589.
Durante, Alessandra Spada
Wieselberg, Margarita Bernal
Roque, Nayara
Carvalho, Sheila
Pucci, Beatriz
Gudayol, Nicolly
and
de Almeida, Kátia
2017.
Assessment of hearing threshold in adults with hearing loss using an automated system of cortical auditory evoked potential detection.
Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 2,
p.
147.