Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T20:16:59.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Congenital Deafness*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

A. A. J. van Egmond
Affiliation:
(Utrecht)

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1954

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crew, F. A. E. see Sorbsby, A. (1953) Clinical genetics, p. 74. Butterworth & Co., London.Google Scholar
Waardenburg, P. J. (1951) Am. J. of Hum. genet., 3, 195.Google Scholar
Fay, E. A. (1898) Marriages of the deaf in America. Washington.Google Scholar
de Wilde, P. A. (1913) Ned. T. Geneesk., 57, 1287.Google Scholar
Hammerschlag, W. (1910) Z. Ohrenheilk., 61, 225.Google Scholar
Goldsciimidt, A. B. (1952) Understanding Heredity. Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
Alerecht, W. (1922) Arch. Ohr.-, Nas.-u. KehThHeilk., 110, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindenov, H. (1945) Opera ex dome biol. hered. human. Univers. Hafniens Copenhagen. Vol. 8.Google Scholar
Hopkins, L. A. a.o. (1946) Laryngoscope, 56, 570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, L. A. a.o. (1949) Clark School Studies, Concerning the heredity of deafness. Monograph. I. The Clarke School for the deaf. Northampton, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, (1953) Quoted by Wildervanck, L. S., Heredity and deafness. Proceedings of the internat. course in pædo-aud. Groningen.Google Scholar
Fraser, J. S. (1927) J. Laryng, 42, 315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebenmann, F. and Bing, R. (1907) Z. Ohrenheilh., 54, 265.Google Scholar
Quix, and Brouwer, (1910) Die Anatomie der Taubstummheit. VII Lieferung Bergman. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Nager, F. H. (1927) Beitr. path. Anat., 77, 288.Google Scholar
Saxén, A. (1933) Acta oto-laryng. (Stochh.), 19, 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gauger, K. (1942) Arch. Ohr.-, Nas.-u. KehlkHeilh., 151, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, F. (1950) Arch. Otolaryng. (Chicago), 51, 852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ombrédanne, (1953) Soc. Franc. d' Oto rhino laryng. (communication).Google Scholar
Potter, E. L. (1937) J. Hered., 28, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cocquet, M. (1944) Ann. Pædiat., 163, 83.Google Scholar
Goodhill, V. (1950) Ann. Otol. etc. (St.Louis), 59, 1123.Google Scholar
Hazell, K. (1950) J. Laryng., 64, 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnet, R. N. and Ryder, C. F. (1950) Arch. Otolaryng. (Chicago), 52, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maspétol, and Thevenard, (1951) Ann. Otolaryng., 68, 417.Google Scholar
Crabtree, N., and Gerrard, J. (1950) J. Laryng., 64, 482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrard, J. (1952) J. Laryng., 66, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, (1945) Quoted Thesis. Kamerbeek, p. 77.Google Scholar
Kamerbeek, A.E.H.M. (1949) Het rubella probleem in het licht van Nederlandse ervaringen. Thesis. Leiden.Google Scholar
Schall, L. A., Lurie, M. H., and Kelemen, G. (1951) Laryngoscope, 61, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GrüNeberg, H. (1947) Animal genetics and medicine. New York. Paul B. Hoeber.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M. (1934) Arch. Otolaryng. (Chicago), 20, 790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar