Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:52:55.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Clinical applications of transcranial bone conduction attenuation in children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

Iyngaran Vanniasegaram ,
Jane Bradley  and
Sue Bellman
Iyngaran Vanniasegaram*
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH
Jane Bradley
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH
Sue Bellman
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH
*
Dr I. Vanniasegaram. Department of Audiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Great Ormond Street, London WCIN 3JH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is a common belief that there is no significant transcranial attenuation across the skull by bone conduction (BC). In 32 children with proven unilateral sensorineural hearing loss the unmasked bone thresholds were measured on each side. There was a significant attenuation of BC at 4 kHz. Transcranial attenuation of BC at 4 kHz may explain the difference in sound perception between the two ears when bone conduction amplification is used. Further research should be undertaken to identify the better cochlea in mixed hearing losses.

Keywords

Bone conductionAudiometry
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 108 , Issue 10 , October 1994 , pp. 834 - 836
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bell, I., Goodsell, S., Thornton, A. R. D. (1980) A brief communication on bone conduction artifacts. British Journal of Audiologx 14: 73–75.Google Scholar
British Society of Audiology (1981) Recommended procedure for pure tone audiometry using a manually operated instrument. British Journal of Audiology 15: 213–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Society of Audiology: Technical note (1985) Recommended procedure for pure tone bone conduction without masking using a manually operated instrument. British Journal of Audiologx 19: 281–282.Google Scholar
British Society of Audiology: Technical note (1987) Recommended procedure for Rinne and Weber tuning fork tests. British Journal of Audiology 21: 229–230.Google Scholar
Dean, C. E. (1930) Audition by bone conduction. Journal Acoustic Society of America 2: 281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirkes, D., Swindeman, J. (1967) The variability of occluded bone conduction thresholds. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 10: 232–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirkes, D. D. (1985) Bone conduction testing. In Handbook of Clinical Audiologx. 3rd Edition (Katz, J. ed.). Williams & Wilkins. Baltimore, pp 202–223.Google Scholar
Frank, T., Ragland, R. E. (1987) Repeatability of high frequency bone conduction thresholds. Ear and Hearing 8 (6): 343–346.Google Scholar
Groen, J. J. (1962) The value of the Weber test. In International Symposium on Otosclerosis, (Schuknecht, H. F, ed.). Little Brown & Co., Boston, pp 165–174.Google Scholar
Hart, C. W., Naunton, R. F. (1961) Frontal bone conduction tests in clinical audiometry. Laryngoscopy 71: 24.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, G. R. (1979) Airborne radiation from bone conduction transducers. British Journal of Audiologx 13: 53–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shipton, M S., John, A. J., Robinson, D. W. (1980) Air-radiated sound from bone vibration transducers and its applications for bone conduction audiometry. British Journal of Audiology 14 (3): 86–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Studebaker, G. (1964) Clinical masking of air and bone-conducted stimuli. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 29: 23–25.Google Scholar
Yang, E. Y., Rupert, A. L., Moushegian, G. (1982) A developmental study of bone conduction auditory brain stem response in infants. Ear and Hearing 8 (4): 244–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar