Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-01T12:59:49.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Choice of cochlear implant side in a paediatric population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2014

Ö Sürmelioğlu ,
F Çetik ,
Ö Tarkan ,
S Özdemir ,
Ü Tuncer ,
M Kiroğlu  and
R Şahin
Ö Sürmelioğlu*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
F Çetik
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
Ö Tarkan
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
S Özdemir
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
Ü Tuncer
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
M Kiroğlu
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
R Şahin
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Ö Sürmelioğlu, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana 01330, Turkey E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To compare the effect of right- or left-sided cochlear implantation on listening skills in a paediatric population.

Methods:

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the listening skills performance data of children who were operated on and followed up at the Çukurova University Department of Otorhinolaryngology between 2007 and 2011. Sixty-three patients were included in the study. Patients were evaluated using the Listening Progress Profile, the Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale and the littlEARS test.

Results:

The mean age of the children was two years (range of one to five years). Twenty-nine patients were male and 34 were female. Twenty-eight patients were implanted in the right ear and 35 in the left ear. There were no statistically significant differences between right and left ear implantees in terms of listening skills performance.

Conclusion:

This study indicates that the choice of cochlear implant side is not crucial for the development of listening skills.

Keywords

Cochlear ImplantationDeafnessAuditory Localization
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 128 , Issue 6 , June 2014 , pp. 504 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented as a poster at the 11th European Symposium on Pediatric Cochlear Implantation, 23–26 May 2013, Istanbul, Turkey.

References

1Baldassari, CM, Schmidt, C, Schubert, CM, Srinivasan, P, Dodson, KM, Sismanis, A. Receptive language outcomes in children after cochlear implantation. Pediatr Otolaryngol 2009;140:114–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Francis, HW, Yeagle, JD, Bowditch, S, Niparko, JK. Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear. Ear Hear 2005;26:7–16Google Scholar
3Morris, LG, Mallur, PS, Roland, JT Jr, Waltzman, SB, Lalwani, AK. Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:25–30Google Scholar
4Langers, DRM, van Dijk, P, Backes, WH. Lateralization, connectivity and plasticity in the human central auditory system. Neuroimage 2005;28:490–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Zattore, RJ, Belin, P, Penhune, VB. Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. Trends Cogn Sci 2002;6:37–46Google Scholar
6Tervaniemi, M, Hugdahl, K. Lateralization of auditory cortex functions. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2003;43:231–46CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Scheffler, K, Bilecen, D, Schmid, N, Tschopp, K, Seelig, J. Auditory cortical responses in hearing subjects and unilateral deaf patients as detected by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 1998;8:156–63Google Scholar
8Suzuki, M, Kitano, H, Kitanishi, T, Itou, R, Shiino, A, Nishida, Y et al. Cortical and subcortical activation with monaural monosyllabic stimulation by functional MRI. Hear Res 2002;163:37–45Google Scholar
9Ponton, CW, Vasama, JP, Tremblay, K, Khosla, D, Kwong, B, Don, M. Plasticity in the adult human central auditory system: evidence from late-onset profound unilateral deafness. Hear Res 2001;154:32–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Khosla, D, Ponton, CW, Eggermont, JJ, Kwong, B, Don, M, Vasama, JP. Differential ear effects of profound unilateral deafness on the adult human central auditory system. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2003;4:235–49Google Scholar
11Bertoncini, J, Marais, J, Bueliac-Babic, R, McAdams, S, Peretz, I, Mehler, J. Dichotic perception and laterality in neonates. Brain Lang 1989;37:591–605CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Dehaene-Lambertz, G, Hertz-Pannier, L, Dubois, J. Nature and nurture in language acquisition: anatomical and functional brain imaging studies in infants. Trends Neurosci 2006;29:367–73CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Henkin, Y, Taitelbaum, R, Hildesheimer, M, Migirov, L, Kronenberg, J, Kishon-Rabin, L. Is there a right cochlear implant advantage? Otol Neurol 2008;29:489–94Google Scholar
14Chen, MJ, Shipp, D, Abidi, A, Ng, A, Nedzelski, JM. Does choosing the “worse” ear for cochlear implantation affect outcome? Otol Neurol 2001;22:335–9Google Scholar
15Newcombe, F, Ratcliff, G. Handedness, speech lateralization and ability. Neuropsychologia 1973;11:399–407Google Scholar
16Rasmussen, T, Milner, B. The role of early left-brain injury in determining lateralization of cerebral speech functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1977;299:355–69CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed