Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:18:20.241Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bilateral cochlear implantation in a patient with petrous bone cholesteatoma in the only hearing ear: case report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2011

S T Husseini*
Affiliation:
Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Italy
M Guida
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, University of Parma, Italy
M Negri
Affiliation:
Department of ENT, Carpi Hospital, Modena, Italy
M Falcioni
Affiliation:
Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Italy
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Sami Tanbouzi Husseini, Gruppo Otologico, Via Emmanueli 42, 29100 Piacenza, Italy Fax: +39 0523453708 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

We report a case of successful cochlear implantation in a patient with petrous bone cholesteatoma in the only hearing ear.

Case report:

A 63-year-old man presented with a four-year history of right-sided, progressive hearing loss in his only hearing ear. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a right supralabyrinthine petrous bone cholesteatoma, with erosion of the superior semicircular canal and the roof of the internal auditory canal. Due to the high risk of post-operative right-sided deafness, we decided first to perform left cochlear implantation. Five months later, the patient had a 40 per cent score for open-set two-syllable word recognition and an 85 per cent score for sentence recognition. Given these good performances, we decided to eradicate the cholesteatoma via a translabyrinthine approach, with insertion of a second cochlear implant, as a single-stage procedure. A successful outcome was achieved.

Conclusion:

Cochlear implantation can be an effective method of hearing rehabilitation in patients with petrous bone cholesteatoma, following total eradication of disease, if the cochlea remains intact. To our best knowledge, this is the first English language report of cochlear implantation in a patient with petrous bone cholesteatoma.

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Omran, A, De Denato, G, Piccirillo, E, Leone, O, Sanna, M. Petrous bone cholesteatoma: management and outcomes. Laryngoscope 2006;116:619–26Google Scholar
2House, WF. Goals of the cochlear implant. Laryngoscope 1974;84:1883–7Google Scholar
3Arístegui, M, Denia, A. Simultaneous cochlear implantation and translabyrinthine removal of vestibular schwannoma in an only hearing ear: report of two cases (neurofibromatosis type 2 and unilateral vestibular schwannoma). Otol Neurotol 2005;26:205–10Google Scholar
4Belal, A Jr. Contraindications to cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1986;7:172–5Google Scholar
5Parnes, LS, Gagne, JP, Hassan, R. Cochlear implants and otitis media: considerations in two cleft palate patients. J Otolaryngol 1993;22:345–8Google Scholar
6Donnelly, MJ, Pyman, BC, Clark, GM. Chronic middle ear disease and cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995;166:406–8Google ScholarPubMed
7Gray, RF, Ray, J, McFerran, DJ. Further experience with fat graft obliteration of mastoid cavities for cochlear implants. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113:881–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Bendet, E, Cerenko, D, Linder, TE, Fisch, U. Cochlear implantation after subtotal petrosectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1998;255:168–74Google Scholar