Hostname: page-component-669899f699-rg895 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T22:55:33.074Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessment of the Quality of Stapedotomy Videos on YouTube Using the IVORY Grading System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2024

Sibel Yıldırım Open the ORCID record for Sibel Yıldırım [Opens in a new window]  and
Alper Ozdilek
Sibel Yıldırım*
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Alper Ozdilek
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Acibadem University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Corresponding Author: Sibel Yıldırım; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed is to analyse the quality of stapedotomy videos as an educational tool and to test the feasibility of the IVORY grading system (IVORY-GS) in an otological procedure.

Methods

YouTube was searched using the terms “stapedectomy”, “stapedotomy” and “otosclerosis surgery.” Video length, upload date, view count and likes were evaluated. The included videos were scored according to the IVORY-GS.

Results

Sixty-seven videos were evaluated. The mean IVORY-GS total score was 21.8. Video scores were higher in the ethics part. Case presentation items got the lowest scores in total. The total score showed a significantly positive correlation with like counts. No significant correlation was found between the total score and view count and video age.

Conclusion

The educational quality of most of the stapedotomy videos on YouTube is insufficient. The IVORY-GS is a comprehensive guideline in the otorhinolaryngology field. However, it may require some modifications based on the type of surgery.

Keywords

educational videosIVORY guidelinestapedotomyYouTube
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 139 , Issue 1 , January 2025 , pp. 23 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Sibel Yıldırım takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Mao, BP, Teichroeb, ML, Lee, T, Wong, G, Pang, T, Pleass, H. Is online video-based education an effective method to teach basic surgical skills to students and surgical trainees? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Educ 2022;79:1536–45CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mota, P, Carvalho, N, Carvalho-Dias, E, Joao Costa, M, Correia-Pinto, J, Lima, E. Video-based surgical learning: improving trainee education and preparation for surgery. J Surg Educ 2018;75:828–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rapp, AK, Healy, MG, Charlton, ME, Keith, JN, Rosenbaum, ME, Kapadia, MR. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J Surg Educ 2016;73:1072–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, B, Bavier, R, Warren, C, Yan, J, Paskhover, B. Qualitative evaluation of paediatric surgical otolaryngology content on YouTube. J Laryngol Otol 2020;134:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strychowsky, JE, Nayan, S, Farrokhyar, F, MacLean, J. YouTube: a good source of information on pediatric tonsillectomy? Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2013;77:972–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malik, TAM, Heywood, EG, O'Connor, TJ, Baker, DM, Marshall, JH, Beasley, N. YouTube™ as a source of information for patients undergoing laryngectomy: a thematic analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:3213–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luu, NN, Yver, CM, Douglas, JE, Tasche, KK, Thakkar, PG, Rajasekaran, K. Assessment of YouTube as an educational tool in teaching key indicator cases in otolaryngology during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: neck dissection. J Surg Educ 2021;78:214–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chorath, KT, Luu, NN, Douglas, JE, Yver, CM, Thakkar, PG, Tasche, KK, et al. Assessment of YouTube as an educational tool in teaching thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy. J Laryngol Otol 2022;136:952–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, MJ, Knoll, RM, Bouhadjer, K, Remenschneider, AK, Kozin, ED. Educational quality of YouTube cholesteatoma surgery videos: areas for improvement. OTO Open 2022;6:2473974X221120250CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Celentano, V, Smart, N, McGrath, J, Cahill, RA, Spinelli, A, Obermair, A, et al. LAP-VEGaS practice guidelines for reporting of educational videos in laparoscopic surgery: a joint trainers and trainees consensus statement. Ann Surg 2018;268:920–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simon, F, Peer, S, Michel, J, Bruce, IA, Cherkes, M, Denoyelle, F, et al. IVORY guidelines (instructional videos in otorhinolaryngology by YO-IFOS): a consensus on surgical videos in ear, nose, and throat. Laryngoscope 2021;131:E732-E7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayer, M, Isik, TB, Nachtsheim, L, Wolber, P, Hansen, KK, Grosheva, M, et al. Analysis of the quality of parotidectomy videos on YouTube using the IVORY-grading-system. Laryngoscope 2023;133:2631–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Assessment of educational progress. In: https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/hsts/howgpa.aspx [7 April 2011]Google Scholar
Shabli, S, Heuermann, K, Leffers, D, Kriesche, F, Abrams, N, Yilmaz, M, et al. Survey on the need for an e-learning-platform for ENT residents. Laryngorhinootologie 2019;98:869–76Google ScholarPubMed
De La Torre, AB, Joe, S, Lee, VS. An evaluation of YouTube videos as a surgical instructional tool for endoscopic endonasal approaches in otolaryngology. Ear Nose Throat J 2021:1455613211062447Google ScholarPubMed
Sunba, S, Levin, M, Wu, V, Campisi, P. The educational value of thyroidectomy YouTube videos for surgical trainees. Am J Otolaryngol 2023;44:103799CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Yıldırım and Ozdilek supplementary material

Yıldırım and Ozdilek supplementary material
Download Yıldırım and Ozdilek supplementary material(File)
File 18.3 KB