Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:18:31.109Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing day-case septorhinoplasty: prospective audit study using patient-based indices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2006

Christos Georgalas ,
Santdeep Paun ,
Azida Zainal ,
Nimesh N. Patel  and
George Mochloulis
Christos Georgalas
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St Mary’s Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Santdeep Paun
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St Mary’s Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Azida Zainal
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St Mary’s Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Nimesh N. Patel
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St Mary’s Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
George Mochloulis
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, London and the Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, efficacy and acceptability to patients of day-case septorhinoplasty. Twenty-nine patients undergoing elective septorhinoplasty in a dedicated teaching hospital day-case unit were asked to complete day surgery questionnaires (DSQ) at six weeks post-operatively. Details of surgery performed, demographic data, readmission rates and complications were collected prospectively. No major complications were recorded. One patient had to be admitted for overnight observation following post-operative bleeding. The DSQ showed that the great majority of patients were satisfied from the day-case setting (satisfaction score 81). This preliminary study showed that day surgery septorhinoplasty was acceptable to the patient and was associated with a very low readmission rate. We believe that in carefully selected young healthy patients it is an acceptable alternative to an in-patient procedure.

Keywords

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresPatient SatisfactionRhinoplasty
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 116 , Issue 9 , September 2002 , pp. 707 - 710
Copyright
© Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)