Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T17:37:10.502Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Approximation of muscle remnants improves cosmesis following hemimandibulectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

P Chaturvedi*
Affiliation:
Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Pankaj Chaturvedi, Associate Professor, Head and Neck Service, Tata Memorial Hospital, EB Road, Parel, Mumbai 400012, India. Fax: 022 24146937 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Hemimandibulectomy should be avoided whenever possible, as it results in significant deterioration in quality of life. If hemimandibulectomy is unavoidable, attempts should be made to reconstruct the bone and soft tissue defect by free tissue transfer or a pedicled flap such as a pectoralis major myocutaneous flap. Bony reconstruction may become challenging when oncological safety mandates removal of the vertical ramus or the condyle. Elderly patients and those with significant co-morbidity are not suitable for prolonged microvascular surgery. Oral cancer is a disease of impoverished nations, where most health institutions may not have the infrastructure to offer microvascular reconstruction. The pectoralis major myocutaneous flap, the workhorse for reconstruction of such defects, occasionally has limitations in terms of bulk, limited arc of rotation, shoulder dysfunction etc. Therefore, hemimandibulectomy and primary mucosal closure continues to be a common procedure in developing nations. A simple technique is proposed with which to improve cosmesis following hemimandibulectomy, utilising the locally available muscle remnants. In highly selected patients, the remaining muscles can be approximated to prevent the lateral hollow that is a common but unacceptable sequel to hemimandibulectomy.

Type
Short Communications
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Wilson, KM, Rizk, NM, Armstrong, SL, Gluckman, JL. Effects of hemimandibulectomy on quality of life. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1574–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Chepeha, DB, Teknos, TN, Fung, K, Shargorodsky, J, Sacco, AG, Nussenbaum, B et al. Lateral oromandibular defect: when is it appropriate to use a bridging reconstruction plate combined with a soft tissue revascularized flap? Head Neck 2008;30:709–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Nahabedian, MY, Tufaro, A, Manson, PN. Improved mandible function after hemimandibulectomy, condylar head preservation, and vascularized fibular reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:506–10CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Patel, A, Maisel, R. Condylar prostheses in head and neck cancer reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2001;127:842–6Google ScholarPubMed
5Patel, SG, Deshmukh, SP, Savant, DN, Bhathena, HM. Comparative evaluation of function after surgery for cancer of the alveolobuccal complex. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:698703CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed