Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T03:32:16.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An alternative use of the surgical mask for the protection of healthcare workers managing epistaxis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2006

Stephen Gwilym ,
Ruth Armstrong ,
Sujata Kundu  and
Nicholas Steventon
Stephen Gwilym
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
Ruth Armstrong
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
Sujata Kundu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
Nicholas Steventon
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Epistaxis has a reported prevalence of 10–12 per cent in the general population and is thus one of the commonest emergencies in Otolaryngology. We suggest that the patient uses a surgical mask to prevent blood spray during epistaxis management. Utilizing the described technique we have found that protective clothing worn by the healthcare professional is consistently ’blood-free’ atthe end of the procedure. This is in contrast to findings when no facemask is applied.

Keywords

EpistaxisDisease ManagementSurgeryMasks
Type
Brief Report
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 118 , Issue 1 , January 2004 , pp. 46 - 47
Copyright
© Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)