Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:55:05.508Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic, perceptual and aerodynamic voice evaluation in an obese population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2013

S Celebi ,
K Yelken ,
O N Develioglu ,
M Topak ,
O Celik ,
H D Ipek  and
M Kulekci
S Celebi*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
K Yelken
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Gaziosmanpaşa University Medicine Faculty, Tokat, Turkey
O N Develioglu
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
M Topak
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
O Celik
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Maltepe University Medicine Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey
H D Ipek
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
M Kulekci
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence:Dr Saban Celebi, Department of Otolaryngology, Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey Fax: +90 356 213 31 79 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate perceptual, acoustic and aerodynamic voice parameters in obese individuals.

Methods:

Twenty obese and 20 normal-weight volunteers underwent voice evaluation by laryngoscopy, acoustic analysis, aerodynamic measurement and perceptual analysis (using the grade-roughness-breathiness-asthenia-strain (‘GRBAS') scale and the Voice Handicap Index 10 scale). Data from both subject groups were compared.

Results:

No difference was found in acoustic analysis parameters between the two groups (p > 0.05). Maximum phonation time in the obese group (mean ± standard deviation, 19.6 ± 4.9 seconds) was significantly shorter than in controls (26.4 ± 4.1 seconds) (p < 0.001), although the s/z ratio was very similar between the two groups. In the obese and control groups, the mean ± standard deviation grade-roughness-breathiness-asthenia-strain scores were 1 ± 1.3 and 0.2 ± 0.6 (p = 0.002) and the mean ± standard deviation Voice Handicap Index 10 scores were 0.5 ± 1.2 and 1.2 ± 1.7 (p = 0.27), respectively.

Conclusion:

Obese individuals had poorer vocal quality as judged by the grade-roughness-breathiness-asthenia-strain scale, and reduced maximum phonation time. However, there was no change in voice quality as assessed by acoustic analysis and Vocal Handicap Index 10 score, compared with controls.

Keywords

VoiceObesityPhysiologyLarynx
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 127 , Issue 10 , October 2013 , pp. 987 - 990
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Hora, F, Nápolis, LM, Daltro, C, Kodaira, SK, Tufik, S, Togeiro, SM et al. Clinical, anthropometric and upper airway anatomic characteristics of obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Respiration 2007;74:517–24CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Tagaya, M, Nakata, S, Yasuma, F, Noda, A, Morinaga, M, Yagi, H et al. Pathogenetic role of increased nasal resistance in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2010;24:51–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Salome, CM, King, GG, Berend, N. Physiology of obesity and effects on lung function. J Appl Physiol 2010;108:206–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4da Cunha, MB, Passerotti, GH, Weber, R, Zilberstein, B, Cecconello, I. Voice feature characteristic in morbid obese population. Obes Surg 2011;21:340–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Solomon, NP, Helou, LB, Dietrich-Burns, K, Stojadinovic, A. Do obesity and weight loss affect vocal function? Semin Speech Lang 2011;32:31–42CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Boersma, P. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 2001;5:341–5Google Scholar