Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:53:59.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why are head and neck cancer clinicians not measuring quality of life?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2006

H M Mehanna  and
R P Morton
H M Mehanna
Affiliation:
Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, the Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
R P Morton
Affiliation:
Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aim: To quantify and qualify the use of quality of life (QOL) measures by head and neck cancer clinicians and to identify any impediments to the use of these measures.

Methods: Questionnaire survey of members of the Australia and New Zealand Head and Neck Society.

Results: One hundred and twenty-eight of 187 (68.5 per cent) responded. Only 43 (34 per cent) had ever used a QOL questionnaire (QLQ), and only 17 (13 per cent) were currently using one. Impediments to QLQ use included clinicians' perceptions that QLQs were too time-consuming and conferred no proven benefit for clinical management. Nevertheless, 113 (88 per cent) respondents indicated willingness to use a minimum core QLQ – for routine clinical use and for research – but indicated a preference for a short (10–15 questions), quick (less than 10 minutes) questionnaire.

Conclusions: Most head and neck cancer clinicians did not use a QOL measure routinely, with impediments to routine use being mainly clinician-based. Most respondents would use a minimum core QOL measure, especially if it were a short, quick consensus questionnaire.

Keywords

Quality of LifeHead and Neck NeoplasmsQuestionnaires
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 120 , Issue 10 , October 2006 , pp. 861 - 864
Copyright
2006 JLO (1984) Limited

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)