Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-7jkgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-21T16:05:44.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of tissue sealant in parotidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2022

D M Rojoa Open the ORCID record for D M Rojoa [Opens in a new window] ,
F J Raheman ,
R Wright  and
S Ghosh
D M Rojoa*
Affiliation:
Royal Oldham Hospital, Northern Alliance Care, Manchester Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
F J Raheman
Affiliation:
Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK
R Wright
Affiliation:
Royal Oldham Hospital, Northern Alliance Care, Manchester
S Ghosh
Affiliation:
Royal Oldham Hospital, Northern Alliance Care, Manchester
*
Corresponding author: Djamila Rojoa; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Drains are used post-parotidectomy to reduce seroma and haematoma formation. Tissue-derived thrombin sealant can enable a drainless procedure, allowing for an earlier discharge, less discomfort and a more cost-efficient method. This study aimed to assess whether tissue sealant improves wound-related outcomes in parotidectomy.

Method

A systematic literature review was performed using a standardised published methodology and custom database search strategy. A fixed-effect meta-analysis of the combined complications was conducted.

Results

Thirteen studies were identified relating to parotidectomy procedures using tissue sealants, of which nine were included in the quantitative synthesis. Our analysis suggested a reduction in the complication rates, including haematoma and seroma, with drainless parotidectomy procedures involving tissue sealant use when compared with conventional procedures with post-operative drain use.

Conclusion

Fibrin sealant in parotidectomy may be used to facilitate a drainless approach, expediting recovery and offering better comfort to patients.

Keywords

Drainlessparotidectomytissue sealantfibrinparotid surgery
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , First View , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Djamila Rojoa takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Bajwa, MS, Tudur-Smith, C, Shaw, RJ, Schache, AG. Fibrin sealants in soft tissue surgery of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Clin Otolaryngol 2017;42:1141–52Google Scholar
Hey, SY, Flach, S, Shahsavari, S, Manickavasagam, J. Drainless parotidectomy and the same day discharge with routine use of topical haemostatic agent and Balaclava bandage. Clin Otolaryngol 2019;44:1218–20Google Scholar
Findik, UY, Topcu, SY, Vatansever, O. Effects of draıns on pain, comfort and anxiety in patıents undergone surgery. Int J Caring Sci 2013;6:412–19Google Scholar
Cunniffe, HA, Wong, BLK, Hilger, AW, Burgan, OT. Drain-free parotidectomy: a pilot study using ARTISS fibrin sealant. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:2025–9Google Scholar
Woods, RS, Woods, JF, Duignan, ES, Timon, C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of wound drains after thyroid surgery. Br J Surg 2014;101:446–56Google Scholar
Jain, R, Wairkar, S. Recent developments and clinical applications of surgical glues: an overview. Int J Biol Macromol 2019;137:95–106Google Scholar
McInnes, MDF, Moher, D, Thombs, BD, McGrath, TA, Bossuyt, PM, PRISMA-DTA Group et al. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA 2018;319:388–96Google Scholar
Patel, MJ, Garg, R, Rice, DH. Benefits of fibrin sealants in parotidectomy: is underflap suction drainage necessary? Laryngoscope 2006;116:1708–9Google Scholar
Jiang, J, Jia, M, Cai, Z, Yuan, R, Wang, K, Zhang, K et al. The effect evaluation of suction drainage to prevent fistula after superficial parotidectomy. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue 2014;23:759–62Google Scholar
Laccourreye, O, Lisan, Q, Bonfils, P, Garrel, R, Jankowski, R, Karkas, A, et al. Use of P-values and the terms “significant”, “non-significant” and “suggestive” in abstracts in the European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Diseases. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2019;136:469–73Google Scholar
Ioannidis, JPA. The proposal to lower p value thresholds to .005. JAMA 2018;319:1429–30Google Scholar
Chen, W liang, Zhang, L ping, Huang, Z quan, Zhou, B. Percutaneous sclerotherapy of sialoceles after parotidectomy with fibrin glue, OK-432, and bleomycin. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2013;51:786–8Google Scholar
Zwaveling, S, Steenvoorde, P, da Costa, SA. Treatment of postparotidectomy fistulae with fibrin glue. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2006;49:67–9Google Scholar
Charrier, JB, Monteil, JP, Albert, S, Collon, S, Bobin, S, Dohan Ehrenfest, DM. Relevance of Choukroun's platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and SMAS flap in primary reconstruction after superficial or subtotal parotidectomy in patients with focal pleiomorphic adenoma: a new technique. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 2008;129:313–8Google Scholar
Chandarana, S, Fung, K, Franklin, JH, Kotylak, T, Matic, DB, Yoo, J. Effect of autologous platelet adhesives on dermal fat graft resorption following reconstruction of a superficial parotidectomy defect: a double-blinded prospective trial. Head Neck 2009;31:521–30Google Scholar
Poolovadoo, Y, Aggarwal, R, Loughran, S. The use of ARTISSTM in performing parotidectomies as day case surgery: a single-centre review of 31 cases. Clin Otolaryngol 2019;44:847–50Google Scholar
Conboy, P, ChB, M, Brown, DH, ChB, M. Use of tissue sealant for day surgery parotidectomy. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;37:208–11Google Scholar
Trujillo, MM. Biological glues based on fibrin for use in parotid tumour surgery. Transfus Altern Transfus Med 2009;11:19–40Google Scholar
AL-Qahtani, K. Initial experience with hemostatic fibrin glue as adjuvant during drainless parotidectomy. Saudi Dent J 2011;23:67–71Google Scholar
Heffernan, C. Artiss® in parotid surgery: are suction drains still required? 55th Annual IHNS Meeting Report 2014. Irish J Med Sci 2015;184:S111–11Google Scholar
Maharaj, M, Diamond, C, Williams, D, Seikaly, H, Harris, J. Tisseel to reduce postparotidectomy wound drainage: randomized, prospective, controlled trial. J Otolaryngol 2006;35:36Google Scholar
Depondt, J, Koka, VN, Nasser, T, Portier, F, Guedon, C, Barry, B et al. Use of fibrin glue in parotidectomy closure. Laryngoscope 1996;106:784–7Google Scholar
Too, L, Nugent, M. Early experience with Artiss in parotidectomy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015;44:e297–8Google Scholar
Chua, DYK. Drainless parotidectomies versus conventional parotidectomies: randomised control study on efficacy and safety. Ann Acad Med 2019;276:2025–9Google Scholar
Chorney, SR, Ryan, JT. Fibrin sealant and parotidectomy wound complications in 100 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019;276:2621–4Google Scholar
Chudek, DA, Wilkie, MD, Hampton, T, Siau, R, Panarese, A. The effect of fibrin sealant tissue glue in reducing post-operative collections following parotidectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020;277:2055–9Google Scholar
McAuley, L, Pham, B, Tugwell, P, Moher, D. Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 2000;356:1228–31Google Scholar
Conn, VS, Valentine, JC, Cooper, HM, Rantz, MJ. Grey literature in meta-analyses. Nurs Res 2003;52:256–61Google Scholar
Gardner, L. Past national tariffs: documents and policies. In: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/past-national-tariffs-documents-and-policies/ [8 May 2023]Google Scholar