Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T09:20:38.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tympanoplasty graft preparation using ear drops containing polyethylene glycol, flumetasone and clioquinol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2011

R J List*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Fairfield General Hospital, Bury, UK
E P Flook
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Fairfield General Hospital, Bury, UK
H L Tay
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Fairfield General Hospital, Bury, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Richard List, 1 Moorland Road, Harrogate HG2 7HD, UK E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The aim of tympanoplasty graft preparation is to stiffen the fascia or perichondrium and thereby to optimise ease of manipulation. We report 39 cases utilising a novel technique in which the graft is prepared in ear drops containing polyethylene glycol, flumetasone pivalate (0.02 per cent) and clioquinol (1 per cent). This technique is useful in reducing the risk of desiccation if placement is delayed, and may pose less risk of infection and mechanical damage than alternative methods.

Type
Short Communication
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Loock, JW, Naude, N. A randomised controlled trial comparing fresh, dried, and dried-then-rehydrated temporalis fascia in myringoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:97101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Alkan, S, Baylancicek, S, Sozen, E, Basak, T, Dadas, B. Effect of the use of dry (rigid) or wet (soft) temporal fascia graft on tympanoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009;38:126–32Google ScholarPubMed
3Kong, JHK, Walker, PJ. Wooden sandwich method for tympanoplasty graft preparation. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:178CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Kotecha, B, Fowler, S, Topham, J. Myringoplasty: a prospective audit study. Clin Otolaryngol 1999;24:126–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Lee, P, Kelly, G, Mills, RP. Myringoplasty: does the size of the perforation matter? Clin Otolaryngol 2002;27:331–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Yung, MW. Myringoplasty for subtotal perforation. Clin Otolaryngol 1995;20:241–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed