Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-9nwgx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-20T14:09:49.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Surgical closure of nasal septal perforation using mucosal flaps and interposed graft: a case series of 154 patients and literature review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2021

E G Heywood ,
M Daoud ,
A Talawdekar ,
N Ashraf  and
U Raghavan
E G Heywood
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Facial Plastic Surgery, Doncaster and Bassetlaw NHS Foundation Trust
M Daoud*
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Facial Plastic Surgery, Doncaster and Bassetlaw NHS Foundation Trust
A Talawdekar
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Facial Plastic Surgery, Doncaster and Bassetlaw NHS Foundation Trust
N Ashraf
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Facial Plastic Surgery, University Hospital of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, UK
U Raghavan
Affiliation:
Department of ENT and Facial Plastic Surgery, Doncaster and Bassetlaw NHS Foundation Trust
*
Author for correspondence: Dr M Daoud, Department of ENT and Facial Plastic Surgery, Doncaster Royal Infirmary, Thorne Road, Doncaster DN2 5LT, UK E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Nasal septal perforations are defects of the septum. Symptomatic patients failing conservative measures may be considered for surgery; however, the surgery is challenging. This study describes a technique involving mucosal advancement flaps and autologous or acellular porcine interposition grafts and assessed the long-term closure rate and symptom control.

Method

This study looked at patients with symptomatic septal perforations who underwent surgery between 2005 and 2017. Symptoms were assessed pre- and post-operatively using a visual analogue scale. A literature search was performed for septal perforation repair techniques and outcomes.

Results

A total of 95 per cent of patients had complete closure of their septal perforations, 90 per cent had complete symptom control. There were statistically significant differences between the pre- and post-operative mean visual analogue scale score for epistaxis (p < 0.001), crusting (p < 0.001), whistling (p < 0.001) and nasal obstruction (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Surgical closure of nasal septal perforations with mucosal advancement flaps and an interposition graft is a reliable technique with excellent long-term outcomes.

Keywords

Nasal SeptumNasal Septal PerforationRhinoplasty
Type
Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , First View , pp. 1 - 10
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of J.L.O. (1984) LIMITED

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Dr M Daoud takes responsibility for the integrity of the content of the paper

References

Kridel, RWH, Delaney, SW. Simultaneous septal perforation repair with septorhinoplasty: a 31 year experience. Facial Plastic Surgery 2018;34:298–311Google Scholar
Ribeiro, JS, da Silva, GS. Technical advances in the correction of septal perforation associated with closed rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2007;9:321–7Google Scholar
Islam, A, Celik, H, Felek, SA, Demirci, M. Repair of nasal septal perforation with "cross-stealing" technique. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2009;23:225–8Google Scholar
Teymoortash, A, Werner, JA. Repair of nasal septal perforation using a simple unilateral inferior meatal mucosal flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009;62:1261–4Google Scholar
Dosen, LK, Haye, R. Surgical closure of nasal septal perforation, early and long term observations. Rhinology 2011;49:486–1Google Scholar
Wong, S, Raghavan, U. Outcome of surgical closure of nasal septal perforation. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:868–74Google Scholar
Park, JH, Kim, DW, Jin, HR. Nasal septal perforation repair using intranasal rotation and advancement flaps. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2013;27:42–7Google Scholar
Chen, FH, Rui, X, Deng, J, Wen, YH, Xu, G, Shi, JB. Endoscopic sandwich technique for moderate nasal septal perforations. Laryngoscope 2012;122:2367–72Google Scholar
Raol, N, Olson, K. A novel technique to repair moderate-sized nasoseptal perforations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2012;138:714–6Google Scholar
Lee, DH, Yoon, TM, Lee, JK. Clinical utility of the inferior turbinate flaps in the reconstruction of the nasal septum and skull base. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23:322–6Google Scholar
Tastan, E, Aydogan, F, Aydin, E. Inferior turbinate composite graft for repair of nasal septal perforation. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2012;26:237–42Google Scholar
Chhabra, N, Houser, SM. Endonasal repair of septal perforations using a rotational mucosal flap and acellular dermal interposition graft. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2012;2:392–6Google Scholar
Yenigun, A, Meric, A, Verim, A, Ozucer, B, Yasar, H, Ozkul, MH. Septal perforation repair: mucosal regeneration technique. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012;269:2505–10Google Scholar
Ma, YX, Tao, AZ, Lu, C, Tian, H, Dong, BC. Endoscopic repair of nasal septal perforation with acellular dermal matrix and pedicled mucoperichondrial flap [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2011;46:455–8Google Scholar
Castelnuovo, P, Ferreli, F, Khodaei, I, Palma, P. Anterior ethmoidal artery septal flap for the management of septal perforation. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2011;13:411–4Google Scholar
Teymoortash, A, Hoch, S, Eivazi, B, Werner, JA. Experiences with a new surgical technique for closure of large perforations of the nasal septum in 55 patients. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2011;25:193–7Google Scholar
Taskin, U, Yigit, O, Sisman, SA. Septal perforation repairing with combination of mucosal flaps and auricular interpositional grafts in revision patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;145:828–32Google Scholar
Li, F, Liu, Q, Yu, H, Zhang, Z. Pedicled local mucosal flap and autogenous graft for the closure of nasoseptal perforations. Acta Otolaryngol 2011;131:983–8Google Scholar
Giacomini, PG, Ferraro, S, Di Giarolamo, S, Ottaviano, F. Large nasal septal perforation repair by closed endoscopically assisted approach. Ann Plast Surg 2011;66:633–6Google Scholar
Mansour, HA. Repair of nasal septal perforation using inferior turbinate graft. J Laryngol Otol 2011;125:474–8Google Scholar
Rokkjær, MS, Barrett, TQ, Petersen, CG. Good results after endonasal cartilage closure of nasal septal perforations. Dan Med Bull 2010;57:A4196Google Scholar
Kazkayasi, M, Tuna, E, Kilic, C. Bullous middle turbinate flap for the repair of nasal septal perforation. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010;39:203–6Google Scholar
Daneshi, A, Mohammadi, S, Javadi, M, Hassannia, F. Repair of large nasal septal perforation with titanium membrane: report of 10 cases. Am J Otolaryngol 2010;31:387–9Google Scholar
Dhar, V, Watts, S. Closure of nasal septum perforation: a novel technique. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:403–4Google Scholar
Lee, HR, Ahn, DB, Park, JH, Kim, YH, Sin, CM, Youn, SJ et al. Endoscopic repairment of septal perforation with using a unilateral nasal mucosal flap. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2008;1:154–7Google Scholar
Lee, KC, Lee, NH, Ban, JH, Jin, SM. Surgical treatment using an allograft dermal matrix for nasal septal perforation. Yonsei Med J 2008;49:244–8Google Scholar
Barry, C, Eadie, PA, Russell, J. Radial forearm free flap for repair of a large nasal septal perforation: a report of a case in a child. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:996–7Google Scholar
Shikowitz, MJ. Vascularized mucoperiosteal pull through flap for closure of large septal perforation: a new technique. Laryngoscope 2007;117:750–5Google Scholar
Ceylan, A, Ileri, F, Celenk, F, Yilmaz, M, Uslu, S. Upper lateral cartilage inner mucoperichondrial flap technique for the repair of nasal septal perforation. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2007;69:245–50Google Scholar
Kilty, SJ, Brownrigg, PJ, Safar, A. Nasal septal perforation repair using an inferior turbinate flap. J Otolaryngol 2007;36:38–42Google Scholar
André, RF, Lohuis, PJ, Vuyk, HD. Nasal septum perforation repair using differently designed, bilateral intranasal flaps, with nonopposing suture lines. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006;59:829–34Google Scholar
Heller, JB, Gabbay, JS, Trussler, A, Heller, MM, Bradley, JP. Repair of large nasal septal perforations using facial artery musculomucosal (FAMM) flap. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:456–9Google Scholar
Friedman, M, Ibrahim, H, Ramakrishnan, V. Inferior turbinate flap for repair of nasal septal perforation. Laryngoscope 2003;113:1425–8Google Scholar
Zhang, Q, Zhang, J, Li, S. Endoscope-assisted repair of large nasal septal perforation using a complex mucoperichondrial flap and free tissue graft. Chin Med J 2003;116:157–8Google Scholar
Newton, JR, White, PS, Lee, MSW. Nasal septal perforation repair using open septoplasty and unilateral bipedicled flaps. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:52–5Google Scholar
Mobley, SR, Boyd, JB, Astor, FC. Repair of a large septal perforation with a radial forearm free flap: brief report of a case. Ear Nose Throat J 2001;80:512Google Scholar
Woolford, TJ, Jones, NS. Repair of nasal septal perforations using local mucosal flaps and a composite cartilage graft. J Laryngol Otol 2001;115:22–5Google Scholar
Foda, HM. The one-stage rhinoplasty septal perforation repair. J Laryngol Otol 1999;113:728–33Google Scholar
Flavill, E, Gilmore, JE. Septal perforation repair without intraoperative mucosal closure. Laryngoscope 2014;124:1112–7Google Scholar
Emsen, I, Murat, A. Different approach to the reconstruction of nasal septum perforations: Alar winged flap. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:1536–3732Google Scholar
Altun, H, Hanci, D. Olfaction improvement after nasal septal perforation repair with the "cross stealing" technique. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2015;29:142–5Google Scholar
Hanci, D, Altun, H. Repair of nasal septal perforation using middle turbinate flap (monopedicled superiory based bone included conchal flap): a new unilateral middle turbinate mucosal flap technique. Eur Arch Otolaryngol 2015;272:1707–12Google Scholar
Sharma, A, Janus, J, Diggelmann, HR, Hamilton, GS. Healing septal perforations by secondary intention using acellular dermis as a bioscaffold. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2015;124:425–9Google Scholar
Kaya, E, Cingi, C, Olgun, Y, Soken, Hakan PÖ. Three layer interlocking: a novel technique for repairing a nasal septum perforation. Ann Otology Rhinol Laryngol 2015;124:212–15Google Scholar
Virkkula, P, Mäkitie, AA, Vento, SI. Surgical outcome and complications of nasal septal perforation repair with temporal fascia and periosteal grafts. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat 2015;8:7–11Google Scholar
Cassano, M. Endoscopic repair of nasal septal perforation with "slide and patch" technique. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;151:176–8Google Scholar
Ozturk, S, Zor, F, Ozturk, S, Kartal, O, Alhan, D, Isik, S. A new approach to objective evaluation of the success of nasal septum perforation. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41:403–6Google Scholar
Ozdek, A, Bayır, O, Dündar, Y, Tatar, EC, Saylam, G, Korkmaz, M H. Closure of nasal septal perforations using bilateral intranasal advancement/rotation flaps. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2014;24:123–8Google Scholar
Beckmann, N, Ponnappan, A, Campana, J, Ramakrishnan, VR. Posterior septal resection: a simple surgical option for management of nasal septal perforation. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;140:150–4Google Scholar
Jeon, EJ, Cho, J, Lee, JH, Kim, SW, Nam, IC, Park, Yong S et al. The role of temporalis fascia for free mucosal graft survival in small nasal septal perforation repair. J of Craniofac Surg 2014;25:164–6Google Scholar
Foda, HMT, Magdy, EA. Combining rhinoplasty with septal perforation repair. Facial Plas Surg 2006;22:281–8Google Scholar
Hong, SN, Mutsumay, S, Jin, HR. Long-term results of combined rhinoplasty and sept perforation repair. J Facial Plast Surg 2016;18:475–80Google Scholar