Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T09:42:48.764Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spontaneous tumour shrinkage in 1261 observed patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2013

X Huang
Affiliation:
Department of ENT – Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
P Caye-Thomasen
Affiliation:
Department of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet/Gentofte, Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
S-E Stangerup*
Affiliation:
Department of Oto-rhino-laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet/Gentofte, Denmark Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Address for correspondence: Dr S-E Stangerup, Niels Andersens Vej 65, DK-2900 Hellerup, Denmark Fax: +45 39 77 76 34 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

To determine the rate of spontaneous tumour shrinkage in a group of patients with sporadic vestibular schwannoma managed with a ‘wait and scan’ approach.

Patients:

All patients with a unilateral cerebello-pontine angle tumour resembling a vestibular schwannoma were registered prospectively in a national database in Denmark. Patients registered with tumour shrinkage were identified and all computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans retrieved, re-evaluated and related to the clinical data.

Results:

Of 1261 observed patients, 48 displayed spontaneous shrinkage (3.81 per cent). Mean absolute shrinkage was 6.25 mm, equivalent to 52.1 per cent. Absolute shrinkage correlated with tumour size and follow-up period, whereas relative shrinkage was significantly greater for tumours which were purely intrameatal at diagnosis. There was no correlation between age and the degree of shrinkage.

Conclusion:

Four per cent of sporadic vestibular schwannomas shrink spontaneously. These findings substantiate the ‘wait and scan’ strategy for tumours with a largest extrameatal diameter of up to 20 mm.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Sterkers, JM, Perre, J, Viala, P, Foncin, JF. The origin of acoustic neuromas. Acta Otolaryngol 1987;103:427–31Google ScholarPubMed
2Neff, BA, Welling, DB, Akhmametyeva, E, Chang, LS. The molecular biology of vestibular schwannomas: dissecting the pathogenic process at the molecular level. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:197208CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Stangerup, SE, Tos, M, Caye-Thomasen, P, Tos, T, Klokker, M, Thomsen, J. Increasing annual incidence of vestibular schwannoma and age at diagnosis. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:622–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Stangerup, SE, Caye-Thomasen, P, Tos, M, Thomsen, J. The natural history of vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:547–52CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Luetje, CM, Whittaker, CK, Davidson, KC, Vergara, GG. Spontaneous acoustic tumor involution: a case report. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988;98:95–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Penido, NO, Tangerina, RP, Kosugi, EM, Abreu, CE, Vasco, MB. Vestibular schwannoma: spontaneous tumor involution. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2007;73:867–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Redleaf, MI, McCabe, BF. Disappearing recurrent acoustic neuroma in an elderly woman. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1993;102:518–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Yasumoto, Y, Ito, M. Spontaneous regression of a growing vestibular schwannoma. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2006;46:601–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Kanzaki, J, Tos, M, Sanna, M, Moffat, DA, Monsell, EM, Berliner, KI. New and modified reporting systems from the consensus meeting on systems for reporting results in vestibular schwannoma. Otol Neurotol 2003;24:642–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Al, SA, Fagan, PA, Biggs, ND. Conservative management of acoustic neuroma. Skull Base 2006;16:95100Google Scholar
11Battaglia, A, Mastrodimos, B, Cueva, R. Comparison of growth patterns of acoustic neuromas with and without radiosurgery. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:705–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Bederson, JB, von Ammon, K, Wichmann, WW, Yasargil, MG. Conservative treatment of patients with acoustic tumors. Neurosurgery 1991;28:646–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Bozorg, Grayeli A, Kalamarides, M, Ferrary, E, Bouccara, D, El Gharem, H, Rey, A et al. Conservative management versus surgery for small vestibular schwannomas. Acta Otolaryngol 2005;125:1063–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Ferri, GG, Modugno, GC, Pirodda, A, Fioravanti, A, Calbucci, F, Ceroni, AR. Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas: an effective strategy. Laryngoscope 2008;118:951–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Hajioff, D, Raut, VV, Walsh, RM, Bath, AP, Bance, ML, Guha, A et al. Conservative management of vestibular schwannomas: third review of a 10-year prospective study. Clin Otolaryngol 2008;33:255–9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Hoistad, DL, Melnik, G, Mamikoglu, B, Battista, R, O'Connor, CA, Wiet, RJ. Update on conservative management of acoustic neuroma. Otol Neurotol 2001;22:682–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Luetje, CM. Spontaneous involution of acoustic tumors. Am J Otol 2000;21:393–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Mohyuddin, A, Vokurka, EA, Evans, DG, Ramsden, RT, Jackson, A. Is clinical growth index a reliable predictor of tumour growth in vestibular schwannomas? Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2003;28:8590CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Shin, YJ, Fraysse, B, Cognard, C, Gafsi, I, Charlet, JP, Berges, C et al. Effectiveness of conservative management of acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 2000;21:857–62Google ScholarPubMed
20Tschudi, DC, Linder, TE, Fisch, U. Conservative management of unilateral acoustic neuromas. Am J Otol 2000;21:722–8Google ScholarPubMed