Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:26:58.154Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of open-ended questionnaires in patients with balance symptoms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2007

E Stapleton*
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
R Mills
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Ms Emma Stapleton, Department of Otolaryngology, Lauriston Building, Edinburgh EH3 9HA, Scotland, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Introduction:

A clear and detailed clinical history is essential in the assessment of patients with balance symptoms. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of open-ended questionnaires in the specialist balance clinic.

Methods:

Fifty-four consecutive new patients completed an open-ended questionnaire, prior to a consultation in which the clinical history was taken using a standardised proforma. The results of the two were compared.

Results:

The open-ended questionnaires provided patient-centred data, and did not provide clinicians with sufficient data for diagnosis. Patients were more likely to respond in the affirmative when asked about symptoms directly, than to report the same symptoms spontaneously on an open-ended questionnaire. When questions had a number of possible answers, patients were more likely to report them in full in an open-ended questionnaire than to provide a response during direct questioning.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kerr, AG. Assessment of vertigo. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2005;34:285–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Brandt, T, Strupp, M. General vestibular testing. Clin Neurophysiol 2005;116:406–26CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Roberts, JM, Copeland, KL. Clinical websites are currently dangerous to health. Int J Med Inform 2001;62:181–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Zun, LS, Blume, DN, Lester, J, Simpson, G, Downey, L. Accuracy of emergency medical information on the web. Am J Emerg Med 2004;22:94–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Houtkoup-Steenstra, H. Interaction and the Standardised Survey Interview: the Living Questionnaire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 McColl, E, Jacoby, A, Ihomas, L, Soutter, J, Bamford, C, Steen, N, et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health staff and patients. Health Techol Assess 2001;5:1256Google ScholarPubMed
7 Boynton, PM, Wood, GW, Greenhalgh, T. Reaching beyond the white middle classes. BMJ 2004;328:1433–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8 Stephens, D, Kerr, P, Jones, G. Positive experiences reported by significant others of patients with hearing impairments. Audiological Medicine 2004;2:134–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Graneheim, UH, Lundman, B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 2004;24:105–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Hoffman, RM, Einstadter, D, Kroenke, K. Evaluating dizziness. Am J Med 1999;107:468–78CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11 Matthews, WB. Practical Neurology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1963Google Scholar
12 Boynton, PM, Greenhalgh, T. Selecting, designing and developing your questionnaire. BMJ 2004;328:1312–15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Boynton, PM. Administering, analysing and reporting your questionnaire. BMJ 2004;328:1372–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed