Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T10:52:16.298Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prospective evaluation of internal hospital requests for consultation of an Otolaryngology department

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 March 2006

Carmen de Casso ,
Fernando Rapado  and
Andrew Zarod
Carmen de Casso
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
Fernando Rapado
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Blackburn Royal Infirmary, Blackburn, UK
Andrew Zarod
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, North ManchesterGeneral Hospital, Crumpsall, Manchester, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This was a prospective study and analysis of the clinical nature and severity of consultation, patient age and sex, place of consultation, grade of attending doctor and management strategy of in-patients referred for a specialist opinion to a Department of Otolaryngology.

Internal requests for consultation were evaluated at the North Manchester General Hospital between October 1999 and August 2000 (n=101).

Patients referred to the Otolaryngology department were of a varied clinical nature with head and neck complaints being the largest group. Forty-six of the patients had minor complaints.Patients were found to be predominantly male and older than 50 years of age. The grade of attending doctor was predominantly a Specialist Registrar and the management strategy was most frequently conservative.

Many of the requests for consultation were regarding minor problems that could be referred to a routine out-patient clinic. There is a need to improve the indication criteria for internalconsultation, as well as the information provided in them.

Keywords

Referral and ConsultationHospitalOtolaryngology
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 117 , Issue 8 , August 2003 , pp. 630 - 632
Copyright
© Royal Society of Medicine Press Limited 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)