Patient burden of centralization of head and neck cancer surgery

Abstract

This study was undertaken to assess the impact on patients of proposals to centralize head and neck oncology services in the UK. A retrospective audit of the 2001–2002 head and neck cancer database at South Devon district general hospital identified 85 patients (50 males: 35 females; median age 66 years; range 29–93) diagnosed with head and neck cancer. The total number of hospital visits for diagnostic, therapeutic and other management services were recorded (median number of visits 28; range 1–78). Using this data, the extra distance required to travel to a potential regional cancer centre located in Bristol during the first six months of management was extrapolated. It was calculated that each patient would have to travel on average an extra 5333 miles (median 5658; range 185–13 759). Published documents advocating centralization of oncology services make no reference to the patient burden of geographic relocation of medical services. Agencies involved with restructuring oncology services must recognize the non-clinical impact of centralization and make some provision to overcome the burden facing patients and their carers.