Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T08:24:14.622Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nasal splints, revisited

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

D. Malki
Affiliation:
Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, The Edith Cavell Hospital, Peterborough, UK.
S. M. Quine
Affiliation:
Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, The Edith Cavell Hospital, Peterborough, UK.
A. G. Pfleiderer*
Affiliation:
Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, The Edith Cavell Hospital, Peterborough, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Mr A. G. Pfleiderer, Department of Ear, Nose and Throat, The Edith Cavell Hospital, Bretton Gate, Peterborough PE3 9GZ.

Abstract

A study was carried out to compare the effectiveness of nasal splints (in preventing intranasal adhesions) with the morbidity associated with their use in nasal surgery. One hundred and ten patients undergoing a routine nasal operation were randomly allocated into two equal groups, one with splints and the other without. Post-operative pain and discomfort was assessed by a visual analogue scale at 48 hours and a week following surgery when either nasal suction (non-splinted group) or removal of splints was carried out. All patients were examined after six weeks for development of adhesions.

Results showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of adhesions between the splinted and non-splinted patient groups. However, the patients with splints had significantly more pain and nasal discomfort when assessed one week after surgery.

It is concluded that the morbidity associated with nasal splints does not justify their use in routine nasal surgery if the aim is to prevent nasal adhesions, but they may still be indicated for enhancing the stability of the septum following septoplasty.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, J. B., Watson, M. G., Shenoi, P. M. (1987) The role of intra-nasal splints in the prevention of post-operative nasal adhesions. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 101: 11401143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, J. A., Murrant, N. J., Evans, K. L., Lavelle, R. J. (1992) Intra-nasal splints and their effects on intra-nasal adhesions and septal stability. Clinical Otolaryngology 17: 2427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliopoulos, P. N., Philippakis, C. (1989). Prevention of postoperative intra-nasal adhesions (a new material). Journal of Laryngology and Otology 103: 664666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foxen, E. H. M. (1971) In Scott-Brown's Diseases of the Ear, Nose and Throat. 3rd Edition (Ballantyne, J., Groves, J., eds.) Butterworths, London, pp 174175.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, A. G. (1984) Surgery of the nasal septum and pyramid. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 88: 759771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pringle, M. B. (1992) The use of intranasal splints: A consultant survey. Clinical Otolaryngology 17: 535539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shone, G. R., Clegg, R. T. (1987) Nasal adhesions. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 101: 555557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Von Schoenberg, M., Robinson, P., Ryan, R. (1992) The morbidity from nasal splints in 105 patients. Clinical Otolaryngology 17: 528530.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagner, R., Toback, J. M. (1986) Toxic shock syndrome following septoplasty using plastic nasal splints. Laryngoscope 96: 609610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A., Murray, J. A. (1988) Intranasal adhesion formation following surgery for chronic nasal obstruction. Clinical Otolaryngology 13: 139143.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed