Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T00:30:25.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Endoscopy findings affect subjective smell rehabilitation in post-laryngectomy patients using the nasal airflow-inducing manoeuvre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2014

B Saedi*
Affiliation:
ENT Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
E Razmpa
Affiliation:
ENT Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
A Nikjo
Affiliation:
ENT Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
M Ghalandarabadi
Affiliation:
Health Researchers R&D Institute, Tehran, Iran
H Ghadimi
Affiliation:
Otolaryngology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
G Saidabadi
Affiliation:
ENT Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*
Address for correspondence: Dr B Saedi, ENT Research Center, Imam Khomeini Medical Center, Bagherkhan Street, Chamran Highway, Tehran, Iran Fax: +982166581628, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the characteristics of post-laryngectomy patients, including nasal endoscopy findings, that affect subjective smell improvement in the post-surgical period.

Methods:

Thirty patients who had undergone total laryngectomy participated in at least three sessions of a smell rehabilitation programme involving the nasal airflow-inducing manoeuvre, under the supervision of a speech-language pathologist. Patient characteristics and nasal endoscopy findings were evaluated.

Results:

Participants experienced a mean improvement in sense of smell of 61 per cent (p < 0.001) and a significant improvement in appetite (p = 0.002). Male patients and patients with a nasal discharge had a significantly better outcome.

Conclusion:

The nasal airflow-inducing manoeuvre is an effective method for improving smell perception and appetite in laryngectomy patients. There was no relationship between nasal endoscopy findings and outcome of the nasal airflow-inducing manoeuvre rehabilitation programme in our case series.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Moore-Gillon, V. The nose after laryngectomy. J R Soc Med 1985;78:435–9Google Scholar
2Hilgers, FJM, Ackerstaff, AH. Comprehensive rehabilitation after total laryngectomy is more than voice alone. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2000;52:6573Google Scholar
3van Dam, FS, Hilgers, FJ, Emsbroek, G, Tuow, FI, van As, CJ, de Jong, N.Deterioration of olfaction and gustation as a consequence of total laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 1999;109:1150–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Göktas, O, Fleiner, F, Paschen, C, Lammert, I, Schrom, T. Rehabilitation of the olfactory sense after laryngectomy: long-term use of the larynx bypass. Ear Nose Throat J 2008;87:528–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Moor, JW, Rafferty, A, Sood, S. Can laryngectomees smell? Considerations regarding olfactory rehabilitation following total laryngectomy. J Laryngol Otol 2010;124:361–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Miani, C, Ortolani, F, Bracale, AMB, Petrelli, L, Staffieri, A, Marchini, M. Olfactory mucosa histological findings in laryngectomees. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2003;260:529–35Google Scholar
7Welge-Luessen, A, Kobal, G, Wolfensberger, M. Assessing olfactory function in laryngectomees using the Sniffin' Sticks test battery and chemosensory evoked potentials. Laryngoscope 2000;110:300–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Leon, EA, Catalanotto, FA, Werning, JW. Retronasal and Orthonasal Olfactory Ability After Laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:32–6Google Scholar
9Hilgers, FJM, van Dam, F, Keyzers, S, Koster, MN, van As, CJ, Muller, MJ. Rehabilitation of olfaction after laryngectomy by means of a nasal airflow-inducing maneuver: the “polite yawning” technique. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;126:726–32CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Fujii, M, Fukazawa, K, Hatta, C, Yasuno, H, Sakagami, M. Olfactory acuity after total laryngectomy. Chem Senses 2002;27:117–21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Risberg-Berlin, B, Ryden, A, Ylitalo, R, Finzia, C. Development of a clinical instrument improving rehabilitation of olfaction with the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver in Swedish laryngectomized patients. Acta Otolaryngol 2009;129:1026–32Google Scholar
12Goektas, O, Fleiner, F, Frieler, K, Scherer, H, Paschen, C. The scent-diffusing ventilator for rehabilitation of olfactory function after laryngectomy. Am J Rhinol 2008;22:487–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Ward, E, Coleman, A, As-Brooks, C, Kerle, S. Rehabilitation of olfaction post-laryngectomy: a randomised control trial comparing clinician assisted versus a home practice approach. Clin Otolaryngol 2010;35:3945CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Risberg-Berlin, B, Moller, RY, Finizia, C. Effectiveness of olfactory rehabilitation with the nasal airflow-inducing maneuver after total laryngectomy: one-year follow-up study. Arch of Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007;133:650–4Google Scholar
15Risberg-Berlin, B, Ylitalo, R, Finizia, C. Screening and rehabilitation of olfaction after total laryngectomy in Swedish patients: results from an intervention study using the Nasal Airflow-Inducing Maneuver. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;132:301–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Hilgers, FJM, Jansen, HA, van As, CJ, Polak, MF, Muller, MJ, van Dam, F. Long-term results of olfaction rehabilitation using the nasal airflow-inducing (“polite yawning”) maneuver after total laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2002;128:648–73Google Scholar
17Ho, W, Kwong, DLW, Wei, WI, Sham, JST. Change in olfaction after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer—a prospective study. Am J Otolaryngol 2002;23:209–14Google Scholar
18Ozdemir, I, Oztürkcan, S, Bağrıyanık, A, Başoğlu, S, Ozkul, Y, Güvenç, IA et al. The maxillary sinus after total laryngectomy: an electron microscopic study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009;267:715–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Sesterhenn, AM, Fiedler, G, Müller, HH, Wiegand, S, Folz, BJ, Werner, JA. Incidence of sinunasal disease in laryngectomized patients. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2008;70:185–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed