Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T00:44:56.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of a moustache on nasal Staphylococcus aureus colonisation and nasal cytology results in men

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2015

E Soylu*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
I Orhan
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
A Cakir
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
A Istanbullu
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
G Altin
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
R Yilmazer
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
O F Calim
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medipol University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Erkan Soylu, TEM Avrupa Otoyolu Goztepe cıkısı No: 1, Bagcilar, 34214 Istanbul, Turkey Fax: 90 212 460 7070 E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

This study compared the results of nasal Staphylococcus aureus carriage and nasal cytology in men with and without a moustache.

Methods:

The study group comprised 118 adult men with a moustache, and the control group consisted of 123 adult men without a moustache. Samples were taken from the participants' right nasal cavity for cytology and from the left nasal cavity for microbiology.

Results:

The results for S aureus were positive in 19.5 per cent (n = 23) of participants with a moustache and in 20.3 per cent (n = 25) of men without a moustache. This difference was not significant (p > 0.05). However, nasal cytology revealed rich eosinophil clusters in participants with a moustache.

Conclusion:

The presence or absence of a moustache had no effect on nasal S aureus colonisation. However, further research is needed to understand whether the presence of a moustache increases the risk of allergic or non-allergic rhinitis.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Boelaert, JR, Van Landuyt, HW, de Baere, YA, Deruyter, MM, Daneels, RF, Schurgers, ML et al. Staphylococcus aureus infections in haemodialysis patients: pathophysiology and use of nasal mupirocin for prevention. J Chemother 1995;3(7 suppl):4953Google Scholar
2Kluytmans, JA, Manders, MJ, van Bommel, E, Verbrugh, H. Elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in hemodialysis patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1996;17:793–7Google Scholar
3Kluytmans, J, van Belkum, A, Verbrugh, H. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology, underlying mechanism and associated risks. Clin Microbiol Rev 1997;10:505–20Google Scholar
4Bolyard, EA, Tablan, OC, Williams, WW, Pearson, ML, Shapiro, CN, Deitchmann, SD. Guideline for infection control in health care personnel, 1998. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1998;19:407–63Google Scholar
5Goyal, R, Das, S, Mathur, M. Colonisation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among health care workers in a tertiary care hospital of Delhi. Indian J Med Sci 2002;56:321–4Google Scholar
6Alghaithy, AA, Bilal, NE, Gedebou, M, Weily, AH. Nasal carriage and antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hospital and non-hospital personnel in Abha, Saudi Arabia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2000;94:504–7Google Scholar
7Scarnato, F, Mallaret, MR, Croize, J, Kouabenan, DR, Dubois, M, Maitre, A et al. Incidence and prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage among healthcare workers in geriatric departments: relevance to preventive measures. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:456–8Google Scholar
8Meltzer, EO, Jalowayski, AA. Nasal cytology in clinical practice. Am J Rhinol 1988;2:4754Google Scholar
9Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing: 22nd Informational Supplement, Document M100-S22. Wayne, Pennsylvania: CLSI, 2012Google Scholar
10al Bustan, MA, Udo, EE, Chugh, TD. Nasal carriage of enterotoxin-producing Staphylococcus aureus among restaurant workers in Kuwait City. Epidemiol Infect 1996;116:319–22Google Scholar
11Simsek, Z, Koruk, I, Copur, A, Gürses, G. The prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and intestinal parasites among food handlers in Sanliurfa, Southeastern Anatolia. J Public Health Manag Pract 2009;15:518–23Google Scholar
12den Heijer, CD, van Bijnen, EM, Paget, WJ, Pringle, M, Goossens, H, Bruggeman, CA et al. Prevalence and resistance of commensal Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S aureus, in nine European countries: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:409–15Google Scholar
13Pelikan, Z, Pelikan-Filipek, M. Cytologic changes in the nasal secretions during the immediate nasal response. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1988;82:1103–12Google Scholar
14Pelikan, Z, Pelikan-Filipek, M. Cytologic changes in the nasal secretions during the late nasal response. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;83:1068–79Google Scholar
15Gelardi, M, Incorvaia, C, Passalacqua, G, Quaranta, N, Frati, F. The classification of allergic rhinitis and its cytological correlate. Allergy 2011;66:1624–5Google Scholar
16Bickmore, JT, Marshall, ML. Cytology of nasal secretions: further diagnostic help. Laryngoscope 1976;86:516–23Google Scholar
17Gelardi, M, Maselli del Giudice, A, Fiorella, ML, Fiorella, R, Russo, C, Soleti, P. Non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophils and mast cells constitutes a new severe nasal disorder. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2008;23:325–31Google Scholar