Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:13:44.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determining the content of an educational ENT website using the Delphi technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

J Doshi  and
J McDonald
J Doshi*
Affiliation:
ENT Department, Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
J McDonald
Affiliation:
Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee, Scotland, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mr Jayesh Doshi, ENT Department, Heartlands Hospital, Bordesley Green East, Bordesley Green, Birmingham B9 5SS, UK Fax: +44 (0)121 424 1353 E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop an educational website (www.enttheatre.com) that showed common ENT operations and emergencies, in order to help improve the basic surgical ENT knowledge of medical students and junior doctors. A two-round Delphi survey was conducted to establish the contents of the website. ‘Experts’ who participated in the Delphi process included otolaryngology consultants and trainees, junior doctors, general practitioners, and medical students. First- and second-round Delphi response rates were 49 per cent (61/125) and 92 per cent (56/61), respectively. Our paper presents a consensus opinion on what basic surgical knowledge a medical student or junior doctor should be familiar with in otolaryngology.

Keywords

InternetEducation, MedicalOtolaryngology
Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 126 , Issue 4 , April 2012 , pp. 402 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Presented orally at the Midlands Institute of Otology Meeting, 15 January 2010, Shrewsbury, UK, and as a poster at the ENT UK meeting, 10 September 2010, Coventry, UK

References

1Linstone, H, Turoff, M.The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1975Google Scholar
2Clayton, R, Perera, R, Burge, S.Defining the dermatological content of the undergraduate medical curriculum: a modified Delphi study. Br J Dermatol 2006;155:137–44CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Mace, AD, Narula, AA.Survey of current undergraduate otolaryngology training in the United Kingdom. J Laryngol Otol 2004;118:217–20CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Chawdhary, G, Ho, EC, Minhas, S.Undergraduate ENT education: what students want. Clin Otolaryngol 2009;34:584–5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Sharma, A, Machen, K, Clarke, B, Howard, D.Is undergraduate otorhinolaryngology teaching relevant to junior doctors working in accident and emergency departments? J Laryngol Otol 2006;120:949–51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Clamp, PJ, Gunasekaran, S, Pothier, DD, Saunders, MW.ENT in general practice: training, experience and referral rates. J Laryngol Otol 2007;121:580–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Veitch, D, Lewis, M, Gibbin, K.General practitioner training in ENT in the Trent Region. J R Soc Med 1992;85:156–8Google ScholarPubMed
8Bull, S, Mattick, K.What biomedical science should be included in undergraduate medical courses and how is this decided? Med Teach 2010;32:360–7Google Scholar
9Sax, LJ, Gilmartin, SK, Bryant, AN.Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Res Higher Edu 2003;44:409–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar