Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:29:25.017Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bone-anchored hearing aids in children and young adults: the Freeman Hospital experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2010

Y Ramakrishnan*
Affiliation:
Newcastle Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Programme, Department of ENT and Audiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
S Marley
Affiliation:
Newcastle Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Programme, Department of ENT and Audiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
D Leese
Affiliation:
Newcastle Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Programme, Department of ENT and Audiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
T Davison
Affiliation:
Newcastle Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Programme, Department of ENT and Audiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
I J M Johnson
Affiliation:
Newcastle Bone Anchored Hearing Aid Programme, Department of ENT and Audiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Yujay Ramakrishnan, c/o Ms Katherine Gibson, Mr Johnson's Secretary, ENT Dept, Freeman Hospital, High Heaton, Newcastle NE7 7DN, UK E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective:

To investigate the utilisation of bone-anchored hearing aids and Softband, as well as the effects on quality of life, amongst the paediatric and young adult population of Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.

Method:

Retrospective, anonymised, cross-sectional survey using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory and Listening Situation Questionnaire (parent version), administered at least three months following the start of bone-anchored hearing aid or Softband use.

Results:

One hundred and nine patients were included, of whom syndromic children made up a significant proportion (22 of 109). Patients using bone-anchored hearing aids obtained significant educational and social benefit from their aids. The mean Listening Situation Questionnaire difficulty score was 17 (15 patients), which is below the trigger score of 22+ at which further reassessment and rehabilitation is required. 87% (of 15 patients) did not require further intervention. The overall mean GBI score for the 22 patients (syndromic and non-syndromic) was +29.

Conclusion:

The use of bone-anchored hearing aids and Softband results in significant improvements in quality of life for children and young adults with hearing impairment. There is significant under-utilisation of bone-anchored hearing aids in children with skull and congenital abnormalities, and we would advocate bone-anchored hearing aid implantation for these patients.

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Sheehan, PZ, Hans, PS. UK and Ireland experience of bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA) in individuals with Down syndrome. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2006;70:981–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2Arunachalam, PS, Kilby, D, Meikle, D, Davison, T, Johnson, IJM. Bone anchored hearing aid quality of life assessed by Glasgow Benefit Inventory. Laryngoscope 2001;111:1260–3CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Kunst, SJ, Hol, MK, Snik, AF, Mylanus, EA, Cremers, CW. Rehabilitation of patients with conductive hearing loss and moderate mental retardation by means of a bone-anchored hearing aid. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:653–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Frenzel, H, Hanke, F, Beltrame, M, Wollenberg, B. Application of the Vibrant Soundbridge in bilateral congenital atresia in toddlers. Acta Otolaryngol 2010;130:966–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Frenzel, H, Hanke, F, Beltrame, M, Steffen, A, Schönweiler, R, Wollenberg, B. Application of the Vibrant Soundbridge to unilateral osseous atresia cases. Laryngoscope 2009;119:6774CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed