Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T00:20:03.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bone anchored hearing aid wearers with significant sensorineural hearing losses (borderline candidates): patients' results and opinions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

S. H. Hartland  and
D. W. Proops
S. H. Hartland
Affiliation:
Departments of Audiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
D. W. Proops
Affiliation:
Departments of Otolaryngology, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA) have been implanted in Birmingham since 1988. Since this time confidence has grown in the fitting and rehabilitation of BAHA wearers, with a corresponding increase in the implantation and rehabilitation of more difficult and borderline candidates.

This study analyses the results of 16 borderline BAHA candidates who have been assessed and fitted with a BAHA at Birmingham Children's Hospital and Queen Elizabeth Hospital, and who have had at least one post-fitting review. All of these subjects had mean bone conduction (BC) thresholds, in the better hearing ear, in excess of 45 dBHL in the frequency range 0.5–4 kHz, when initially assessed. The age range at the time of the study was 10–84 years, with a mean age of 60 years. The study demonstrates the benefits that these patients achieved with the BAHA compared to their previous aid, both audiologically and in terms of comfort and reduction in ear discharge.

Keywords

Hearing aid, bone anchoredHearing loss, sensorineural
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 110 , Supplement 21 , December 1996 , pp. 41 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cremers, C. W. R. J., Snik, A. F. M., Beynon, A. J. (1992) Hearing with the bone anchored hearing aid BAHA HC200 compared to conventional bone conduction hearing aid. Clinical Otolaryngology 17 (3): 275–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakansson, B., Tjëllström, A., Rosenhall, U., Carlsson, P. (1985) The bone anchored hearing aid principal design and a psychoacoustical evaluation. Acta Otolaryngologica 100: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mylanus, E. A. M., Snik, A. F. M., Cremers, C. W. R. J. (1995) Patients options of bone anchored vs conventional hearing aids. Archives of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery 121: 421–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snik, A. F. M., Jorritsma, F. F., Cremers, C. W. R. J., Beynon, A. J., van den Berge, N. W. (1992) The superbass bone anchored hearing aid compared to conventional hearing aids. Audiological results and the patients opinion. Scandinavian Audiology 21: 151–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snik, A. F. M., Mylanus, E. A. M., Cremers, C. W. R. J. (1995) Bone anchored hearing aids in patients with sensorineural hearing loss and persistent otitis externa. Clinical Otolaryngology 20: 31–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed