Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:44:42.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unidentical twins: recent social policy developments in Canada and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Daniel Béland  and
Alex Waddan
Daniel Béland
Affiliation:
McGill Institute for the Study of Canada, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
Alex Waddan*
Affiliation:
McGill Institute for the Study of Canada, McGill University, Montreal, Canada School of History, Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
*
CONTACT Alex Waddan [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is a vast social policy literature on how Canada and the United States share key characteristics associated with the liberal welfare regime such as significant reliance on both social assistance and tax-subsidized private benefits and services. Yet, a closer look at these two countries points to key differences in areas such as fiscal federalism, health care, old-age pensions, and family benefits. This special issue of the Journal of Comparative and International Social Policy looks at recent social policy developments in Canada and the United States in ways that further illustrate the broad similarities, but also the key cross-national differences in policy design and real-world consequences, between these two countries. This Introduction explains why Canada and the United States are “unidentical twins” in social policy before discussing the contributions comprising this special issue.

Keywords

Social policypolicy changeCanadaUnited States
Type
Introduction
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 35 , Issue 1: SI: Recent Social Policy in Canada and the United States , February 2019 , pp. 1 - 4
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Béland, D., Rocco, P., & Waddan, A. (2016). Obamacare wars: Federalism, state politics and the affordable care act. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Béland, D., & Waddan, A. (2017). Why are there no universal social programs in the United States? An historical institutionalist comparison with Canada. World Affairs, 180(1), 64–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D., & Weaver, K. (2019). Federalism and the politics of the Canada and Quebec pension plans. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen. (1998). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harles, J. (2017). Seeking equality: The political economy of the common good in the United States and Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, R., & King, D. (2019). ’Race was a motivating factor’: Re-segregated schools in the American States. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laperrière, M., Orloff, A. S., & Pryma, J. (2019). Recent gendered social policy developments in the United States. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy.Google Scholar
Maioni, A. (1998). Parting at the crossroads: The emergence of health insurance in the United States and Canada. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Myles, J. (1998). How to design a ‘liberal’ welfare state: A comparison of Canada and the United States. Social Policy & Administration, 32(4), 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, J., Shaver, S., & Orloff, A. S. (1999). States markets, families: Gender, liberalism and social policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plante, C. (2019). Policy or window dressing? Exploring the impact of poverty reduction strategies on poverty rates among the Canadian Provinces. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, S., & White, L. (2019). Childcare deserts and distributional disadvantages: The legacies of split childcare policies and programs in Canada. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P., Leruth, B., & Chung, H. (Eds.). (2017). After austerity: Welfare state transformation in Europe after the great recession. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Théret, B. (1999). Regionalism and federalism: A comparative analysis of the regulation of economic tensions between regions by Canadian and American federal intergovernmental transfer programmes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(3), 479–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuohy, C. H. (2019). Icon and taboo: Single-payer politics in Canada and the US. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waddan, A. (2019). President Obama, poverty and the scope and limits of social policy change. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar