Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:01:21.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Providing choice? A comparison of UK and Ireland's family support in a time of austerity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Verity Campbell-Barr  and
Anne Coakley
Verity Campbell-Barr*
Affiliation:
Plymouth Institute of Education, Plymouth University, Rolle Building, Drake Circus, PlymouthPL4 8AA, UK
Anne Coakley
Affiliation:
Department of Humanities, Carlow College, Carlow, Ireland
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Providing support to families has long been a feature of social policy systems globally. Recent years have increasingly seen family support shift to recognise the growing trend and policy ambition of maternal employment, particularly in a European context. UK and Ireland represent two examples of countries that have sought to respond to changing labour market and work–life balance dynamics through promoting a choice agenda for working mothers. Whilst both countries are characterised as neo-liberal economies they have promoted the choice agenda via different welfare benefit packages. The recent economic crisis has seen both countries cutting the level of support provided for families, raising questions about the extent that mothers are still being provided with choice in how to combine work and family life. Whilst the cuts look to refocus welfare provision on vulnerable children and their families, they also reflect the push towards individualised responsibility for managing new social risks.

Keywords

choicefamily welfarenew social riskschildcare support
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , October 2014 , pp. 231 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 Taylor & Francis

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aveling, N. (2002). “Having it all” and the discourse of equal opportunity: Reflections on choices and changing perceptions. Gender and Education, 14(3), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamfield, L. (2012). Child poverty and social mobility: Taking the measure of the coalition's “new approach”. The Political Quarterly, 83(4), 830–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blow, L., Walker, I., & Zhu, Y. (2012). Who benefits from child benefit? Economic Inquiry, 50(1), 153–170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brewer, M., Clark, T., & Wakefield, M. (2002). Social security under new labour: What did the third way mean for welfare reform. London: Institute of Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Brown, J. (2012). The impact of austerity measures on households with children. London: Family and Parenting Institute and Institute of Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
Butt, S., Goddard, K., La Valle, I., & Hill, M. (2007). Childcare nation? Progress on the childcare strategy and priorities for the future. London: Daycare Trust and National Centre for Social Research.Google Scholar
Byrne, B. (2006). In search of a “good mix”: “Race”, class, gender and practices of mothering. Sociology, 40(6), 1001–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Barr, V. (2010). The research, policy and practice triangle in early childhood education and care. In R. Parker-Rees, , C. Leeson, , J. Willan, , & J. Savage, (Eds.), Early childhood studies: An introduction to the study of children's lives and worlds (pp. 163–175). Exeter: Learning Matters.Google Scholar
Campbell-Barr, V., & Garnham, A. (2010). What parents want – parents and childcare: A literature review. Manchester: Equality and Human Rights Commission. Retrieved from http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/advice-and-guidance/here-for-everyone-here-for-business/working-better/Google Scholar
Central Statistics Office. (2011). Women and men in Ireland 2010. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Cerami, A. (2008). New social risks in central and eastern Europe: The need for a new empowering politics of the welfare state. Czech Sociological Review, 44(6). Retrieved from SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=1308424Google Scholar
Children's Rights Alliance. (2009). Pre-budget submission to the dept of social and family affairs. Retrieved July 17, 2011, from www.childrensrights.ieGoogle Scholar
Clarke, J., Smith, N., & Vidler, E. (2005). Consumerism and the reform of public services: Inequalities and instabilities, analysis and debate in social policy 2005. Social Policy Review, 12, 167–182.Google Scholar
Cohen, B., Moss, P., Petrie, P., & Wallace, J. (2004). A new deal for children? Re-forming education and care in England, Scotland and Sweden. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Considine, M., & Dukelow, F. (2011). Ireland and the impact of the economic crisis: Upholding the dominant policy paradigm. In K. Farnsworth, & Z. Irving, (Eds.), Social policy in challenging times (pp. 181–198). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crown Copyright. (2002). Employment act. London: Author.Google Scholar
Crown Copyright. (2006). Work and families act. London: Author.Google Scholar
CSO QNHS. (2010). Central Statistics Office Quarterly National Household Survey 2010. Dublin: Stationery Office. Retrieved from http://www.cso.ie/en/newsandevents/pressreleases/2011pressreleases/quarterlynationalhouseholdsurveyquarter42010/Google Scholar
Daly, M. (2011). What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 18(1), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Finance. (2005). Discussion paper on childcare. Retrieved July 18, 2011, from www.finance.gov.ieGoogle Scholar
Department of Health and Children. (2006). National Childcare Investment Programme 2006–2010. Dublin: Stationery Office. Retrieved from http://www.mccc.ie/docs/national_childcare_investment_programme.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Social Protection. (2010). A policy and value for money review of child income support and associated spending programmes. Dublin: Stationary Office.Google Scholar
Department of Social Protection. (2011). Review of child income support policies and programmes. Report of the consultation seminar. Retrieved November 9, 2011, from http://www.welfare.ie/en/downloads/cisreview_seminar.pdfGoogle Scholar
DTI. (2000). Work and parents: Competitiveness and choice. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Duncan, S., & Edwards, R. (1999). Lone mothers, paid work and gendered moral rationalities. London: UCL Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, E. (2005). Targeting child benefits in a transition economy. The Economics of Transition, 13(10), 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellison, G., Barker, A., & Kulasuriya, T. (2009). Work and care: A study of modern parents. Manchester: EHRC/YouGov.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020. Retrieved February 10, 2011, from http://.ec.europa.euGoogle Scholar
Fanning, B. (2003). The construction of Irish social policy (1953–2003). Administration, 51(1–2), 3–18.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, K., & Irving, Z. (2011). Contemplating the implications of the economic crisis for social policy: Confusion, contradictions, opportunities and risk. In Farnsworth, K. & Irving, Z. (Eds.), Social policy in challenging times (pp. 1–32). Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Fine-Davis, M. (2007). Childcare in Ireland today; briefing paper to the Irish congress of trade unions. Trinity College, University of Dublin. Retrieved March 12, 2012, from http://www.ictu.ie/publications/fulllist/childcare-in-ireland-today-briefing-paper/Google Scholar
Goddard, K., & Knights, E. (2009). Quality costs: Paying for early childhood education and care. London: Daycare Trust.Google Scholar
Greener, K. (1998). Child benefit: Research paper 98/79. Social Policy Section. London: House of Commons Library.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, D., & Rubery, J. (2012). The end of the UK's liberal collectivist social model? The implications of the coalition government's policy during the austerity crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 36(1), 105–126. doi:10.1093/cje/ber033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, N., & Bradley, S. (2006). The childcare question. In Fanning, B. & Rush, M. (Eds.), Care and social change in the Irish welfare economy (pp. 163–178). Dublin: UCD Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (2000). Invest in the very young. Chicago, IL: Ounce of Prevention Fund and the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy Studies.Google Scholar
Heise, A., & Lierse, H. (2011). The effects of European austerity programmes on social security systems. Modern Economy, 2, 498–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henricson, C. (2003). Government and parenting: Is there a case for a policy review and parents code. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
HM Government. (2011). A new approach to child poverty: Tackling the causes of disadvantage and transforming families’ lives. Norwich: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
HM Treasury. (2010). Spending review. Norwich: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
HM Treasury & DTI. (2003). Balancing work and family life: Enhancing choice and support for parents. London: Author.Google Scholar
Irish Times. (2012). Major cuts to child benefit expected. Retrieved March 12, 2013, from www.irishtimes.comGoogle Scholar
James, A., & Prout, A. (2001). Constructions and reconstruction's of British childhood: An interpretative survey of 1800 to present. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Janus, A. L. (2012). The gap between mothers’ work–family orientations and employment trajectories in 18 OECD countries. European Sociological Review. Retrieved from http://esr.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2012/07/06/esr.jcs055.full.pdf+htmlGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J. (2006). The LEGO paradigm and new social risks: Consequences for children in context. In Lewis, J. (Ed.), Children, changing families and welfare states (pp. 27–50). Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Judge, L. (2013). Will universal credit work? London: TUC and Child Poverty Action Group.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. (2002). Maternity in Ireland; a woman-centred perspective. Dublin: Liffey Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, J., Knijn, T., Martin, C., & Ostner, I. (2008). Patterns of development in work/family reconciliation policies for parents in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and the UK in the 2000s. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 15(3), 261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, E. (2008). The interface between childcare, family support and child poverty strategies under new labour: Tensions and contradictions. Social Policy and Society, 7(4), 479–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandate. (2012). Decent work? The impact of the recession on low paid workers. Retrieved July 31, 2012, from http://www.tuleftforum.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/decent-work.pdfGoogle Scholar
Matzke, M., & Ostner, I. (2010). Postscript; ideas and agents of change in time. Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 468–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, P. (2003). Getting beyond childcare: Reflection on recent policy and future possibilities. In Brannen, J. & Moss, P. (Eds.), Rethinking children’s care (pp. 25–43). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
National Economic and Social Council. (2013). Report 134; the social dimensions of the crisis: The evidence and its implications. Retrieved May 5, 2014, from www.nesc.ieGoogle Scholar
National recovery plan 2010–2014. (2010). Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
National Women's Council of Ireland. (2009). Who cares? Challenging the myths about gender and care in Ireland. Retrieved November 3, 2009, from www.nwci.ieGoogle Scholar
ONS. (2011). Mothers in the labour market 2011. London: Crown Copyright. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/dcp171776_234036.pdfGoogle Scholar
Penn, H. (2010). Shaping the future: How human capital arguments about investment in early childhood are being (mis)used in poor countries. In Yelland, N. (Ed.), Contemporary perspective on early childhood education (pp. 49–65). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Culture and welfare state policies; reflections on a complex interrelation. Journal of Social Policy, 34(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierson, P. (2001). Coping with permanent austerity: Welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies. In Pierson, P. (Ed.), The new politics of the welfare state (pp. 410–456). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reed, H. (2012). In the eye of the storm: Britain's forgotten children and families. A research report for Action for Children, The Children's Society and NSPCC. Retrieved August 6, 2012, from: http://www.actionforchildren.org.uk/media/4012135/in_the_eye_of_the_storm.pdfGoogle Scholar
Repo, K. (2004). Combining work and family in two welfare state contexts: A discourse analytical perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 38(6), 622–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, D. (2010). Child and family policies in a time of economic crisis. Children & Society, 24(6), 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RTE News. (2012). Social Justice Ireland criticises proposal to cut child benefit. Retrieved October 1, 2012, from www.rte.ie/news2012/1001/child-benefit-budget.htmlGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004). New risks and social change. In Taylor-Gooby, P. (Ed.), New risks, new welfare and the transformation of the European welfare state (pp. 1–28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P., & Wallace, A. (2009). Public values and public trust: Responses to welfare state reform in the UK. Journal of Social Policy, 38(3), 401–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The National Children's Strategy. (2000). Our children-their lives. Dublin: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (2004). Rethinking families. London: Caloute Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar