Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:40:29.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democracy and new ideas in Latin American social policy: the origins of conditional cash transfers in Brazil and Mexico

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2020

Ricardo Velázquez Leyer
Ricardo Velázquez Leyer*
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Political Sciences, Universidad Iberoamericana, Mexico City, Mexico
*
CONTACT Ricardo Velázquez Leyer [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Conditional cash transfers (CCTs) have become the main instrument to combat poverty in Latin America, they have been exported around the globe and are one of the most popular social policies of the twenty-first century. CCTs deliver cash transfers to poor families with conditionalities like attendance to school and health appointments. This article aims to explain the creation of CCTs. The research applies arguments from theories of social policy development to explain the formulation of the first two CCTs introduced in Brazil at the sub-national level and in Mexico at the national level during the mid-1990s. Findings show that the original formulation of CCTs can be explained by the emergence of a new policy paradigm based on a conceptualisation of the nature of poverty as lack of human capital among poor population, enabled by critical junctures created by the transitions to democratic regimes.

Keywords

Social policyLatin Americaconditional cash transfersinstitutional analysisBrazilMexico
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , July 2020 , pp. 125 - 141
Copyright
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amenta, E. (2003). What we know about the development of social policy: Comparative and historical research in comparative and historical perspective. In Mahoney, J., & Rueschemeyer, D. (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 42–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barba, C. (2006). La reforma social y el regimen de bienestar mexicano. In Franco, R., & Lanzaro, J. (Eds.), Politica y politicas publicas en los procesos de reforma de America Latina (pp. 169–210). Buenos Aires: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Barrientos, A. (2009). Labour markets and the (hyphenated) welfare regime in Latin America. Economy and Society, 38(1), 87–108. doi: 10.1080/03085140802560553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrientos, A., & Villa, J. M. (2016). Economic and political inclusion in human development conditional income transfer programmes in Latin America. Social Policy and Society, 15(3), 421–433. doi: 10.1017/S1474746416000075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D. (2010). What is social policy? Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Béland, D. (2016). Ideas and institutions in social policy research. Social Policy & Administration, 50(6), 734–750. doi: 10.1111/spol.12258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D., & Hacker, J. (2004). Ideas, private institutions and American welfare state ‘exceptionalism’: The case of health and old-age insurance, 1915-1965. International Journal of Social Welfare, 13(1), 42–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-6866.2004.00296.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Béland, D., & Mahon, R. (2016). Advanced introduction to social policy. Cheltehnam: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Buarque, C. (2013). Bolsa-Escola. History, theory and Utopia. Brasilia, DF : Thesaurus Editora.Google Scholar
Cappoccia, G. (2016). Critical Junctures. In Fioretos, O., Falleti, T., & Sheingate, A. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Insitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crespo, J. A. (2003). Mexico: el fin de la hegemonia partidista. Documentos de Trabajo. Mexico. CIDE: DF.Google Scholar
Crespo, J. A. (2004). The party system and democratic governance in Mexico. Policy Papers on the Americas, Volume XV Study 2. Washington DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Daigneault, P. M. (2014). Reassessing the concept of public policy paradigm: Aligning ontology and methodology in policy studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(3), 453–469. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.834071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLeon, P., & Hernández-Quezada, M. (2001). The case of the national solidarity program in Mexico: A study in comparative policy termination. International Journal of Public Administration, 24(3), 289–309. doi: 10.1081/PAD-100000449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dion, M. (2010). Workers and welfare: Comparative institutional change in twentieth-century Mexico. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drabik Chaves, A., Monteiro, M. G., & Abranches Sucupira, L. (2007). O Que Nos Diz o Desenho do Programa Bolsa Família. Paper presented at the XXXI Econtro da Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração (ANPAD).Google Scholar
ECLAC. (2018). CEPALSTAT Databases and Indicators. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. http://estadisticas.cepal.org/cepalstat/WEB_CEPALSTAT/estadisticasIndicadores.asp?idioma=i.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985). Power and Distributional Regimes. Politics & Society, 14, 223–256. doi: 10.1177/003232928501400204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Fairfield, T., & Garay, C. (2017). Redistribution under the right in Latin America: Electoral competition and organized actors in policymaking. Comparative Political Studies, 50(14), 1871–1906. doi: 10.1177/0010414017695331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, T. B. (2009). Avoiding governors: The success of Bolsa Família. Latin American Research Review, 44(1), 102–131. doi: 10.1353/lar.0.0073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenwick, T. B. (2015). Avoiding governors: Federalism, democracy and poverty alleviation in Brazil. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filgueira, F. (2005). Welfare and democracy in Latin America: The development, crises and aftermath of Universal, Dual and Exclusionary Social States'. Paper prepared for the UNRISD Project on Social Policy and Democratization.United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
Filgueira, F., & Reygadas, L. (2010). Inequality and the incorporation crisis: The left’s social policy toolkit. In Cameron, M., & Hershberg, E. (Eds.), Latin America’s left turns (pp. 171–192). London: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Fizsbein, A., & Schady, N. (2009). Conditional cash transfers: Reducing present and future poverty. Washington, DC : World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fonseca, A., & Montali, L. (1996). O programa de renda mínima de Campinas: Uma estratégiade combate à pobreza urbana'. Paper presented at the XX Encontro Anual da ANPOCS Caxambu, October 22-26.Google Scholar
Franco, R. (2006). Modelos de politica social en America Latina en el ultimo cuarto de siglo. In Franco, R. & Lanzaro, J. (Eds.), Politica y politicas publicas en los procesos de reforma de America Latina (pp. 147–168). Buenos Aires: FLACSO.Google Scholar
Garay, C. (2016). Social policy expansion in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granados, M. (2014). Garantías legales y programáticas para hacer efectivos los derechos de laspersonas mayores en el Distrito Federal de la Ciudad de México. In Bárcena, A. (Ed.), Autonomía y dignidad en la vejez: Teoría y práctica enpolíticas de derechos de las personas mayores. Ciudad de México: Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe.Google Scholar
Hacker, J. (2004). Privatizing risk without privatizing the welfare state: The hidden politics of social policy retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98, 243–260. doi: 10.1017/S0003055404001121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. doi: 10.2307/422246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, M., & Varone, F. (2016). The public policy process. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huber, E., & Stephens, J. (2012). Democracy and the left: Social policy and inequality in Latin America. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J. (2010). Diffusing ideas for after neoliberalism: The social investment perspective in Europe and Latin America. Global Social Policy, 10(1), 59–84. doi: 10.1177/1468018109354813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, R., & Nelson, J. (2004). Crucial needs, weak incentives: Social sector reform, democratization, and globalization in Latin America. Washington, DC : Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lavinas, L. (2013). 21st century welfare. New Left Review, 84(November–December), 5–40.Google Scholar
Lavinas, L., & Simoes, A. (2015). Social policy and structural heterogeneity in Latin America: The turning point of the 21st century. In Fritz, B., & Lavinas, L. (Eds.), A moment of equality for Latin America? (pp. 77–102). Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lavinas, L., & Varsano, R. (1997). Programas de garantia de renda mínima e ação coordenada decombate à pobreza'. Texto para Discussão, 534. Rio de Janeiro: IPEA.Google Scholar
Leite, C., & Peres, U. (2013). Origem e disseminacao do Programa Bolsa Família: aproximacoes analíticas como o caso mexicano. Revista do Servicio Público, 64(3), 351–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leite, C., & Peres, U. (2015). Paradigmas de Desenvolvimento e Disseminacao de Políticas: Raízes Locais da Criacao do Programa Bolsa Família. Organizacoes & Sociedade, 22(75), 621–638. doi: 10.1590/1984-9230758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, S. (1991). La pobreza extrema en México: Una propuesta de política. Estudios Económicos, 6(1), 47–89.Google Scholar
Levy, S. (2006). Progress against poverty: Sustaining Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades programme. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Press.Google Scholar
Levy, S., & Rodríguez, E. (2004). Economic crisis, political transition and poverty policy reform: Mexico’s Progresa-Oportunidades program. Inter-American Development Bank, DC : Washington.Google Scholar
Levy, S., & Rodríguez, E. (2005). Sin herencia de pobreza. El programa Progresa-Oportunidades de México. México, DF : Editorial Planeta.Google Scholar
Lindert, K., Linder, A., Hobbs, J., & De la Brière, B. (2007). The Nuts and Bolts of Brazil’s Bolsa Família Program: Implementing Conditional Cash Transfers in a Decentralized Context. Social Protetion Discussion Paper No. 0709, The World Bank.Google Scholar
Martínez Franzoni, J., & Sánchez-Ancochea, D. (2014). The double challenge of martket and social incorporation: Progress and bottlenecks in Latin America. Development Policy Review, 32(3), 275–298. doi: 10.1111/dpr.12055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meseguer, C., & Gilardi, F. (2008). Reflexiones sobre el debate de la difusión de políticas públicas. Política y Gobierno, XV(2), 315–351.Google Scholar
Myles, J. & Quadagno, J. (2002). Political theories of the welfare state. Social Science Review . 76(1), 35–47.Google Scholar
Olsen, G., & O’Connor, J. (1998). Introduction understanding the welfare state: Power resources theory and its critics. In O’Connor, J., & Olsen, G. (Eds.), Power resoruces theory and the welfare state. A critical approach (pp. 3–36). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Papadopoulos, T., & Velázquez Leyer, R. (2016). Two decades of social investment in Latin America: Outcomes, shortcomings and achievements of conditional cash transfers. Social Policy & Society, 15(3), 435–449. doi: 10.1017/S1474746416000117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, N., & Theodore, J. (2016). Retracing fast policy. Political Geography, 53(2016), 89–99.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time. History, institutions and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro do Nascimiento, E., & Aguiar, M. (2006). Bolsa Escola: historia y evolución, Cuadernos de Investigación del Instiuto Internacional de Planeamiento de la Educaión (IIPE). Paris: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación y la Ciencia (UNESCO).Google Scholar
Pribble, J. (2014). Welfare and party politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Araujo, O. (2010). The emergence and entrenchment of a new political regime in Mexico. Latin American Perspectives, 170 37(1), 35–61. doi: 10.1177/0094582X09355428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roma, C. (2006). Organizaciones de partido en Brasil: el PT y el PSDB bajo perspectiva comparada. América Latina Hoy, 44, 153–184.Google Scholar
Samuels, D. (2004). As Bases do Petismo. Opinião Pública, X(2), 221–241. doi: 10.1590/S0104-62762004000200002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. (2016). Review Forum. Understanding fast policy worlds. Political Geography, 53, 89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.11.001Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. (2008). Historical instutionalism. In Porta, D., & Keating, M. (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences. A pluralist perspective (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, N. B. (2008). Theories of policy diffusion: Social sector reform in Brazil. Comparative Political Studies, 14(2), 193–216. doi: 10.1177/0010414007300916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugiyama, N. B. (2011). The diffusion of conditional cash transfer programs in the Americas. Global Social Policy, 11(2-3), 250–278. doi: 10.1177/1468018111421295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suplicy, E. M., & Buarque, C. (1997). Garantia de renda mínima para erradicar a pobreza: o debate e a experiencia brasileiros. Estudos Avançados, 11(30), 79–93. doi: 10.1590/S0103-40141997000200007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thelen, K. (2003). How Institutions Evolve. In Mahoney, J., & Rueschmeyer, D. (Eds.), Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valencia, E. (2013). Actores y políticas sociales en Brasil y México (borrador septiembre 2013), Universidad Iberoamericana Puebla.Google Scholar
Wennemo, I. (1998). The development of family policy: A comparison of benefits and Tax reductions for families in eighteen OECD countries. In O’Connor, J. & Olsen, G. (Eds.), Power resources theory and the welfare state (pp. 70–97). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (2004). Learning from foreign models in Latin American social policy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. (2014). Condtional Cash Transfers (CCTs). Social Safety Net Course by Kathy Lindert, December 2014, The World Bank.Google Scholar