Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T18:48:01.996Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Combining labour market and unemployment policies with environmental sustainability? A cross-national study on ecosocial innovations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2020

Ingo Stamm ,
Aila-Leena Matthies ,
Tuuli Hirvilammi  and
Kati Närhi
Ingo Stamm*
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science, University of Jyvaskyla, Kokkola University Consortium Chydenius, Kokkola, Finland
Aila-Leena Matthies
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science, University of Jyvaskyla, Kokkola University Consortium Chydenius, Kokkola, Finland
Tuuli Hirvilammi
Affiliation:
Department of Social Science, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
Kati Närhi
Affiliation:
Department of Social Work, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyvaskyla, Finland
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Labour market and unemployment policies in particular are rarely connected to issues of environmental sustainability. In the present article, the link is examined by focusing on ecosocial innovations in four European countries – Finland, Germany, Belgium and Italy. These innovations are small-scale associations, cooperatives or organizations that create new integrative practices combining both social and environmental goals. By asking how their social practices are linked with labour market and unemployment policies, we explore the scope for new ecosocial policies. The results of this cross-national case study lead to three lessons to be learnt for a future ecosocial welfare state: at the sectoral level, organizational level and individual level. In summary, many valuable ideas, instruments and programmes towards sustainability already exist in the field, but they are not yet integrated in the current labour market and unemployment policies.

Keywords

Labour market and unemployment policiesenvironmental sustainabilityecosocial policiesecosocial innovationscross-national study
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 2020 , pp. 42 - 56
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Social Policy Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abteilung, Soziales. (2017). Sozialstatistik 2017. Autonome Provinz Bozen-Südtirol.Google Scholar
Adamy, W. (2012). Hartz IV – Achillesferse der Arbeits‐ und Sozialhilfepolitik. In Bispinck, R., Bosch, G., Hofemann, K., & Naegele, G. (Eds.), Sozialpolitik und Sozialstaat. Festschrift für Gerhard Bäcker (pp. 257–291). Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agostini, C., & Natali, D. (2016). Italian welfare reforms: Missed opportunities for a paradigmatic change? In Schubert, K., de Villota, P., & Kuhlmann, J. (Eds.), Challenges to European welfare systems (pp. 37–57). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Andersson, J. O. (2009). Basic income from an ecological perspective. Basic Income Studies, 4(2). doi: 10.2202/1932-0183.1180Google Scholar
Angelov, N., & Johansson, M. V. (2011). Green jobs. In Fitzpatrick, T., (Ed.), Understanding the environment and social policy (pp. 245–269). Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aurich-Beerheide, P., Catalano, S. L., Graziano, P. R., & Zimmermann, K. (2015). Stakeholder participation and policy integration in local social and employment policies: Germany and Italy compared. Journal of European Social Policy, 25(4), 379–392. doi: 10.1177/0958928715594543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baglioni, S., & Giugni, M. (Eds.). (2014). Civil society organizations, unemployment, and precarity in Europe : Between service and policy. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, S., & Kuhlmann, J. (2016). Crisis? What crisis? Restructuring the German welfare system in times of unexpected prosperity. In Schubert, K., de Vilotta, P., & Kuhlmann, J. (Eds.), Challenges to European welfare systems (pp. 133–158). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brugiavini, A., & Galasso, V. (2004). The social security reform process in Italy: Where do we stand? Journal of Pension Economics & Finance; Cambridge, 3(2), 165–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busk, H. (2016). Sanctions and the exit from unemployment in two different benefit schemes. Labour Economics, 42, 159–176. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2016.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cahill, M. (2002). The environment and social policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carpentier, S., Neels, K., & Van de Bosch, K. (2017). Exit from and re‐entry into social assistance benefit in Belgium among people with migration background and the native‐born. International Journal of Social Welfare, 26, 366–383. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, E., & Johansson, H. (2016). Social economy and green social enterprises. Production for sustainable welfare? In Koch, M. & Mont, O. (Eds.), Sustainability and the political economy of welfare (pp. 158–170). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, S., Smith, K., & Utting, P. (2012). Green economy or green society? Contestation and policies for a fair transition. Geneva: UNRISD.Google Scholar
Cooley, T. F., & Soares, J. (1999). Privatizing social security. Review on Economic Dynamics, 2(3), 731–755. doi: 10.1006/redy.1999.0069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coote, A. (2015). People, planet, power. Toward a new social settlement. International Journal of Social Quality, 5(1), 8–34. doi: 10.3167/IJSQ.2015.050102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2013). Social innovation, social economy and social enterprise: What can the European debate tell us? In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 40–52). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Elsen, S. (2017). Community-based economy and ecosocial transition. In Matthies, A.-L. & Närhi, K. (Eds.), The ecosocial transition of societies. The contribution of social work and social policy (pp. 54–70). Oxford, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Elsen, S. (2018). Solidarische Ökonomie. Blätter Der Wohlfahrtspflege, 165(6), 206–210. doi: 10.5771/0340-8574-2018-6-206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsen, S. (2019). Eco-social transformation and community-based economy. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
European Union. (2018). Your social security rights in Belgium.Google Scholar
Euzéby, C. (2012). Social protection to achieve sustainable inclusion: A European imperative in the current economic crisis. International Social Security Review, 65(4), 69–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-246X.2012.01442.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (2002). With no strings attached? In Fitzpatrick, T., & Cahill, M. (Eds.), Environment and welfare: Towards a green social policy (pp. 138–154). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (Ed.). (2011). Understanding the environment and social policy. Bristol: Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (2014a). Climate change and poverty. A new agenda for developed nations. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, T. (Ed.). (2014b). International handbook on social policy and the environment. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forstater, M. (2003). Public employment and environmental sustainability. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 25(3), 385–406.Google Scholar
Forstater, M. (2006). Green jobs: Public service employment and environmental sustainability. Challenge, 49(4), 58–72. doi: 10.2753/CHA0577-5132490405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freie Universität Bozen. (2015). Sozialbericht 2015, Autonome Provinz Bozen – Südtirol.Google Scholar
Fullin, G., & Reyneri, E. (2010). Low unemployment and bad jobs for new immigrants in Italy. International Migration, 49(1), 118–147. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2009.00594.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take back the economy. An ethical guide for transforming our communities. Minneapolis: Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gismondi, M. A., Roseland, M., Connelly, S., Markey, S. P., & Beckie, M. (Eds.). (2016). Scaling up: The convergence of social economy and sustainability. Edmonton, AB: AU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. (2013). Climate change, social policy, and global governance. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 29(3), 185–203. doi: 10.1080/21699763.2013.852128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I. (2017). Heat, greed and human need: Climate change, capitalism and sustainable wellbeing. Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, I., & Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Decarbonizing the welfare state. In Dryzek, J. S., Norgaard, R. B., & Schlosberg, D. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 490–503). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gough, I., Meadowcroft, J., Dryzek, J., Gerhards, J., Lengfeld, H., Markandya, A., & Ortiz, R. (2008). JESP symposium: Climate change and social policy. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(4), 325–344. doi: 10.1177/0958928708094890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillen-Royo, M., Guardiola, J., & Garcia-Quero, F. (2017). Sustainable development in times of economic crisis: A needs-based illustration from Granada (Spain). Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 267–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halmetoja, A., De Wispelaere, J., & Perkiö, J. (2019). A policy comet in Moominland? Basic income in the Finnish welfare state. Social Policy and Society, 18(2), 319–330. doi: 10.1017/S1474746418000258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, T., Longhurst, N., & Seyfang, G. (2013). Up, down, round and round: Connecting regimes and practices in innovation for sustainability. Environment and Planning A, 45(2), 402–420. doi: 10.1068/a45124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haxeltine, A., Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J., Kemp, R., Weaver, P., Backhaus, J., & O’Riordan, T. (2013). Transformative social innovations: A sustainability transition perspective on social innovation.Google Scholar
Hirvilammi, T., & Helne, T. (2014). Changing paradigms: A sketch for sustainable wellbeing and ecosocial policy. Sustainability, 6, 2160–2175. doi: 10.3390/su6042160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holden, M. (2011). Urban policy engagement with social sustainability in metro vancouver. Urban Studies, 49(3), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011403015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Labour Organization. (2018). World Employment and Social Outlook 2018 – Greening with jobs . Geneva: ILO. Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_628654.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth. Economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, T., & Victor, P. A. (2013). Green economy at community scale (p. 70). Toronto: George Cedric Metcalf Charitable Foundation.Google Scholar
Jessoula, M., Kubisa, J., Madama, I., & Zielenska, M. (2014). Understanding convergence and divergence: Old and new cleavages in the politics of minimum income schemes in Italy and Poland. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 30(2), 128–146. doi: 10.1080/21699763.2014.936024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johanisová, N., & Fraňková, E. (2013). Eco-social enterprises in practice and theory – A radical versus mainstream view. In Anastasiadis, M. (Ed.), ECO-WISE – Social enterprises as sustainable actors. Concepts, performances, impacts (pp. 110–129). Bremen: EHV.Google Scholar
Johansson, H., Khan, J., & Hildingsson, R. (2016). Climate change and the welfare state. Do we see a new generation of social risks emerging? In Koch, M. & Mont, O. (Eds.), Sustainability and the political economy of welfare (pp. 94–108). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, L. (2010). Labour market activation. In Castles, F. G., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H., & Pierson, C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (pp. 435–447). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Knotz, C. M. (2018). A rising workfare state? Unemployment benefit conditionality in 21 OECD countries, 1980–2012. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34(2), 91–108. doi: 10.1080/21699763.2018.1472136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, M., & Mont, O. (2016). Introduction: Research on sustainable welfare: State of the art and outline of the volume. In Koch, M. & Mont, O. (Eds.), Sustainability and the political economy of welfare (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kokkonen, T., Närhi, K., & Matthies, A.-L. (2018). Transformation of the Finnish welfare state. In Kamali, M. & Jönsson, J. H. (Eds.), Neoliberalism, Nordic welfare states and social work. Current and future challenges (pp. 35–45). London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibetseder, B., Gubrium, E., Dierckx, D., Fluder, R., Hauri, R., & Raeymaeckers, P. (2017). Subsidiarity and social citizenship: Social assistance schemes in Austria, Belgium, Switzerland and Norway. International Journal of Social Welfare, 26, 353–365. doi: 10.1111/ijsw.12241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madama, I. (2013). Beyond continuity? Italian social assistance policies between institutional opportunities and agency. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22, 58–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00835.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, I. (2009). Belgium. The quest for sustainability, legitimacy and a way out of ‘welfare without workʼ. In Schubert, K., Hegelich, S., & Bazant, U. (Eds.), The handbook of european welfare systems (pp. 49–64). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marx, I., & Schuerman, N. (2016). Belgium, or how inertia can have unexpected benefits in times of crisis. In Schubert, K., de Villota, P., & Kuhlmann, J. (Eds.), Challenges to european welfare systems (pp. 395–418). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Matthies, A.-L., & Närhi, K. (Eds.). (2017). The ecosocial transition of societies. The contribution of social work and social policy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Matthies, A.-L., Stamm, I., Hirvilammi, T., & Närhi, K. (2019). Ecosocial innovations and their capacity to integrate ecological, economic and social sustainability transition. Sustainability, 11(7). doi:10.3390/su11072107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Building the environmental state: what the history of social welfare tells us about the future of environmental policy. Alternatives Journal, 33(1), 11–17.Google Scholar
Mehmood, A., & Parra, C. (2013). Social innovation in an unsustainable world. In Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (Eds.), The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research (pp. 53–66). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minas, R., Jakobsen, V., Kauppinen, T., Korpi, T., & Lorentzen, T. (2018). The governance of poverty: Welfare reform, activation policies, and social assistance benefits and caseloads in Nordic countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(5), 487–500. doi: 10.1177/0958928717753591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montt, G., Fraga, F., & Harsdorff, M. (2018). The future of work in a changing natural environment: Climate change, degradation and sustainability. Geneva: ILO. (ILO Future of Work Research Paper Series). Retrieved from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---cabinet/documents/publication/wcms_644145.pdf.Google Scholar
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (Eds.). (2013). The international handbook on social innovation. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Natali, D. (2009). The Italian welfare state (still) in transition. The progressive recalibration of social programmes and greater flexibility of labour market policies. In Schubert, K., Hegelich, S., & Bazant, U. (Eds.), The handbook of european welfare systems (pp. 277–293). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Natali, M. (2018). Explaining different trajectories of minimum income schemes: Groups, parties and political exchange in Italy and Spain. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(2), 116–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928717707272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raeymaeckers, P., & Dierckx, D. (2013). To work or not to work? The role of the organisational context for social workers’ perceptions on activation. British Journal of Social Work, 43(6), 1170–1189. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcs048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ranci, C., & Montagnini, E. (2010). The impact of the commodification of socia care on the role and identity of the third sector in Italy. In Evers, A. & Zimmer, A. (Eds.), Third sector organizations facing turbulent environments (pp. 107–123). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics. Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House.Google Scholar
Saari, J. (2016). Was it too good to be true? Post-2008 crisis welfare state in Finland. In Schubert, K., de Villota, P., & Kuhlmann, J. (Eds.), Challenges to european welfare systems (pp. 223–245). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffrin, A. (2014). The new social risks and opportunities of climate change. In Fitzpatrick, T., (Ed.), International handbook on social policy and the environment (pp. 3–61). Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Schubert, K., de Villota, P., & Kuhlmann, J. (Eds.). (2016). Challenges to european welfare systems. New York: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319076799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Science Communication Unit. (2014). Science for environment policy in-depth report: Social innovation and the environment. Report produced for the European Commission DG Environment. Bristol: University of the West of England. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/IR10_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Seeleib-Kaiser, M., & Fleckenstein, T. (2007). Discourse, learning and welfare state change: The case of german labour market reforms. Social Policy & Administration, 41(5), 427–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007). Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics, 16(4), 584–603. doi: 10.1080/09644010701419121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamm, I. (2015). Das Menschenrecht auf soziale Sicherheit. Sozialpolitisches Handeln am Beispiel Deutschlands und Finnlands. Konstanz/München: UVK.Google Scholar
Stamm, I. (2017). The human right to social security and its impact on socio-political action in Germany and Finland. Journal of Human Rights and Social Work, 2(1–2), 25–33. doi: 10.1007/s41134-017-0030-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stamm, I. P., Hirvilammi, T., Matthies, A.-L., & Närhi, K. (2017). Ecosocial innovations as part of social and solidarity economy: Local models for a sustainable development. RISUS – Journal on Innovation and Sustainability, 8(4), 200–218. doi: 10.24212/2179-3565.2017v8i4p200-218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utting, P. (Ed.). (2015). Social and solidarity economy : Beyond the fringe. London: Zed Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utting, P. (2018). Achieving the sustainable development goals through social and solidarity economy: Incremental versus transformative change. Geneva: United Nations Task Force on Social and Solidarity Economy. (Knowledge Hub Working Paper). Retrieved from http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/%28httpAuxPages%29/DCE7DAC6D248B0C1C1258279004DE587/$file/UNTFSSE---WP-KH-SSE-SDGs-Utting-April2018.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wallimann, I. (2013). Environmental policy is social policy – Social policy is environmental policy: Toward Sustainability Policy. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallimann, I. (2014). Social and solidarity economy for sustainable development: Its premises – And the social economy Basel example of practice. International Review of Sociology, 24(1), 48–58. doi: 10.1080/03906701.2014.894345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zohlnhöfer, R. (2011). Between a rock and a hard place: The grand coalition’s response to the economic crisis. German Politics, 20(2), 227–242. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2011.582100CrossRefGoogle Scholar