Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T22:35:41.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Challenges to the Europeanisation of work-care policies in the Western Balkans

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2022

Ivana Dobrotić Open the ORCID record for Ivana Dobrotić [Opens in a new window]
Ivana Dobrotić*
Affiliation:
Social Policy Unit, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
*
Email: ivana.dobrotic@pravo.hr; ivana.dobrotic@spi.ox.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores work-care policy development in Western Balkans, focusing on a critical assessment of the potential of the European Union’s policy framework to (re)shape the policies adopted in Western Balkans and boost gender equality in employment and care. Two policy measures at the centre of the European agenda are in focus: parenting leaves and early childhood education and care. The EU’s employment-oriented policy framework has met underdeveloped childcare services network and mother-centred and stratifying leave policies in Western Balkans, providing ample space for improvements regarding gender imbalance in care and employment. While the EU policy framework may provide an important push factor towards introducing gender-equalising policies in Western Balkans, it can also bring minimum adjustments. The EU’s ambiguous work-care policy framework, weak legitimacy of gender equality agenda and weak fiscal capacities in Western Balkans, and uncertainties about EU membership prospects may hamper progress towards more inclusive and gender-equal work-care policies.

Keywords

work-care policysocial inequalitiesgender inequalitiesparenting leavesearly childhood education and careWestern Balkans
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , July 2022 , pp. 165 - 179
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with Social Policy Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Auth, D., & Martinek, H. (2017). Social investment or gender equality? Aims, instruments, and outcomes of parental leave regulations in Germany and Sweden. In Auth, D., Hergenhan, J., & Holland-Cunz, B. (Eds.), Gender and family in European economic policy (pp. 153–176). Cham: Palgrave Macmillian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, S., & Dobrotić, I. (2021). The inclusiveness of social rights: The case of leave policies. Social Inclusion, 9(2), 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, S., Formánková, L., & Dobrotić, I. (2014). Family policies in ‘hybrid’ welfare states after the crisis: Pathways between policy expansion and retrenchment. Social Policy & Administration, 48(4), 468–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracewell, W. (2000). Rape in Kosovo: Masculinity and Serbian nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 6(4), 563–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brighouse, H., & Wright, E. O. (2008). Strong gender egalitarianism. Politics and Society, 36(3), 360–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantillon, B., & Van Lancker, W. (2013). Three shortcomings of the social investment perspective. Social Policy & Society, 12(4), 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chieregato, E. (2020). A work-life balance for all? Assessing the inclusiveness of EU directive 2019/1158. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 36(1), 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chieregato, E. (2021). Gender equality and the EU’s economic governance: The strategic use of women’s employment within labour market reforms in Italy. Social Politics, 28(3), 806–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of the EU. (2021). Council resolution on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training towards the European education area and beyond (2021–2030). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32021G0226(01)&from=HR (accessed October 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Council of the European Union. (1996). Directive 96/34/EC of 3 June 1996 on the Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A31996L0034 (accessed October 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Daly, M., & Ferragina, E. (2018). Family policy in high-income countries: Five decades of development. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(3), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Porte, C., Larsen, T. P., & Szelewa, D. (2020). A gender equalizing regulatory welfare state? Enacting the EU’s work-life balance directive in Denmark and Poland. The Annals of The American Academy, 691, 84–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de la Porte, C., & Natali, D. (2014). Altered Europeanisation of pension reform in the context of the great recession: Denmark and Italy compared. West European Politics, 37(4), 732–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deacon, B., & Stubbs, P. (2007). Social policy and international interventions in south East Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrotić, I. (2012). Dejavniki politik usklajevanja plačanega dela in družinskih obveznosti v posocialističnih državah (doktorska disertacija). Ljubljana: Sveučilište u Ljubljani.Google Scholar
Dobrotić, I. (2019). Changing faces of social and gender inequalities in childcare-related policies design in the post-Yugoslav countries. https://www.incare-pyc.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/INCARE_final_en.pdf (accessed October 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Dobrotić, I. (2021). “Rastuća (ne)vidljiva većina?” Nesigurna i netipična zaposlenost i roditeljstvo. https://www.incare-pyc.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/InCARE-report-final-web.pdf (accessed October 11, 2021).Google Scholar
Dobrotić, I., & Blum, S. (2020). Inclusiveness of parental-leave benefits in twenty-one European countries: Measuring social and gender inequalities in leave eligibility. Social Politics, 27(3), 588–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrotić, I., Matković, T., & Zrinščak, S. (2013). Gender equality policies and practices in Croatia – The interplay of transition and late Europeanization. Social Policy & Administration, 47(2), 218–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobrotić, I., & Obradović, N. (2020). Exclusionary side of (women’s) social citizenship in South Eastern Europe: Childcare policies development in Bosnia–Herzegovina and gender, social and territorial inequalities. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 20(3), 411–430.Google Scholar
Dobrotić, I., & Stropnik, N. (2020). Gender equality and parenting-related leaves in 21 former socialist countries. International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 40(5/6), 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucet, A. (2021). Socially inclusive parenting leaves and parental benefit entitlements: Rethinking care and work binaries. Social Inclusion, 9(2), 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucet, A. & McKay, L. (2020). Fathering, parental leave, impacts, and gender equality: What/how are we measuring? International Journal of Sociology & Social Policy, 40(5/6), 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2013). Towards social investment for growth and cohesion – Including implementing the European Social Fund 2014–2020/*COM/2013/083final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52013DC0083 (accessed October 10, 2021).Google Scholar
European Commission. (2019). Economic Reform Programmes of Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Turkey, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/2019-economic-reform-programmes-albania-montenegro-north-macedonia-serbia-turkey-bosnia-and-herzegovina-and-kosovo-commissions-overview-and-country-assessments_en (accessed October 10, 2021).Google Scholar
European Commission. (2020). The European Pillar of Social Rights in 20 principles. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/economy-works-people/jobs-growth-and-investment/european-pillar-social-rights/european-pillar-social-rights-20-principles_en (accessed October 17, 2021).Google Scholar
European Commission. (2021a). The European Pillar of Social Rights action plan. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/economy-works-people/jobs-growth-and-investment/european-pillar-social-rights/european-pillar-social-rights-action-plan_en (accessed October 10, 2021).Google Scholar
European Commission. (2021b). 2021 Economic Reform Programmes of Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Serbia, Turkey, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kosovo. https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/economy-finance-and-euro-publications_en?field_eurovoc_taxonomy_target_id_selective=All&field_core_nal_countries_tid_selective=22004&field_core_flex_publication_date[value][year]=All&field_core_tags_tid_i18n=22632 (accessed October 10, 2021).Google Scholar
Eurostat. (2021a). Expenditure on social protection. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/tps00098/default/table?lang=en (accessed October 17, 2021).Google Scholar
Eurostat. (2021b). Labour market statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/en/web/main/data/database (accessed October 17, 2021).Google Scholar
Eurydice. (2014). Key data on early childhood and care in Europe. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical-books/-/EC-01-14-484?inheritRedirect=true (accessed October 17, 2021).Google Scholar
Gerovska Mitev, M. (2017). Do family benefits trigger or minimise poverty among large households in FYR Macedonia? ESPN Flash Report 2017/01.Google Scholar
Ghysels, J., & Van Lancker, W. (2011). The unequal benefits of activation: An analysis of the social distribution of family policy among families with young children. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 472–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez Urquijo, L. (2017). The Europeanisation of policy to address poverty under the new economic governance: The contribution of the European semester. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 25(1), 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazepov, Y. & Ranci, C. (2017). Is every country fit for social investment? Italy as an adverse case. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(1), 90–104.Google Scholar
Korintus, M., & Stropnik, N. (2009). Hungary and Slovenia: Long leave or short?. In Kamerman, S. B. & Moss, P. (Eds.), The politics of parental leave policies (pp. 135–157). Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
Kotevska, B. (2019). Gender equality: How are EU rules transposed into national law? Republic of North Macedonia. https://epi.org.mk/wp-content/uploads/2019-MK-Country-report-GE_ready_for_web.pdf (accessed October 12, 2021).Google Scholar
Lendvai-Bainton, N. (2020). Diversified convergence: Uneven welfare trajectories in central and Eastern Europe. In An, S., Chubarova, T., Deacon, B., & Stubbs, P. (Eds.), Social policy, poverty, and inequality in central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Agency and institutions in flux (pp. 263–283). Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
Matero, M. (2021). Breadwinners and primary caregivers? Feminist critique of gender equality in the EU law parental leave framework. Trinity College Law Review, 24, 69–94.Google Scholar
MISSCEO. (2021). Family benefits. https://www.coe.int/en/web/european-social-charter/missceo-database (accessed October 16, 2021).Google Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies, challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Moss, P., & Deven, F. (2020). Leave policies in Europe: current policies, future directions. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(5/6), 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mustafa, A. (2021). Early childhood education and care in Kosovo: A targeted educational approach producing and maintaining social and gender inequalities. Revija za Socijalnu Politiku, 28(3), 367–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Brennan, J. (2014). ‘On the slow train to nowhere?’ The European Union, ‘enlargement fatigue’ and the Western Balkans. European Foreign Affairs Review, 19(2), 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obradović, N. (2021). Bosnia and Herzegovina’s family policy challenges in meeting the European Union’s standards and recommendations. Revija za Socijalnu Politiku, 28(3), 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union. (2010). Directive 2010/18/EU of 8 March 2010 implementing the revised Framework Agreement on parental leave concluded by BUSINESSEUROPE, UEAPME, CEEP and ETUC and repealing Directive 96/34/EC. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32010L0018 (accessed October 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union. (2019). Directive 2019/1158/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on work–life balance for parents and carers and repealing Council Directive 2010/18/EU. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32019L1158 (accessed October 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Parolin, Z., & Van Lancker, W. (2021). What a social investment ‘litmus test’ must address: A response to Plavgo and Hemerijck. Journal of European Social Policy, 31(3), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavasović Trošt, T., & Slootmaeckers, K. (2015). Religion, homosexuality and nationalism in the Western Balkans: The role of religious institutions in defining the nation. In Sremac, S., & Ganzevoort, R. R. (Eds.), Religious and sexual nationalisms in central and Eastern Europe. Boston: Brill.Google Scholar
Pavolini, E., & Van Lancker, W. (2018). The Matthew effect in childcare use: A matter of policies or preferences? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 878–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perišić, N., & Pantelić, M. (2021). Care triangle or care diamond? The case of childcare and eldercare in Serbia. Revija za Socijalnu Politku, 28(3), 323–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perišić, N., & Vidojević, J. (2015). The role of public policies in supporting female employment in Serbia. The South Slav Journal, 34(1–2), 58–86.Google Scholar
Prica, I., Čolić, L., & Baronijan, H. (2014). Studija o ulaganju u rano obrazovanje djece u Crnoj Gori. Podgorica: UNICEF.Google Scholar
Rigby, M. J. (2020). A commitment to marginalized children in the European Union: The hope and challenges of the EU child guarantee. Child Care Health Dev, 48, 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saraceno, C. (2015). A critical look to the social investment approach from a gender perspective. Social Politics, 22(2), 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2005). The Europeanisation of central and Eastern Europe: The impact of the EU on the accession countries. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Shiffman, J., Škrabalo, M., & Subotić, J. (2002). Reproductive rights and the state in Serbia and Croatia. Social Science & Medicine, 54(4), 625–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soyaltin-Colella, D., & Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm, R. (2021). Enlargement strategy of the EU: A framework for analysis for the (De)Europeanisation in Turkey. In Süleymanoğlu-Kürüm, R., & Cin, M. F. (Eds.), Feminist framing of Europeanisation: Gender equality policies in Turkey and the EU (pp. 19–40). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spasova, S., Bouget, D., Ghailani, D., & Vanhercke, B. (2017). Access to social protection for people working on non-standard contracts and as self-employed in Europe. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fb235634-e3a7-11e7-9749-01aa75ed71a1/language-en (accessed October 20, 2021).Google Scholar
Stambolieva, M. (2016). Welfare state transformation in the Yugoslav successor states. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stropnik, N. (2021). Slovenia country note. In Koslowski, A., Blum, S., Dobrotić, I., Kaufman, G., & Moss, P. (Eds.), International review of leave policies and research 2021. https://www.leavenetwork.org/annual-review-reports/review-2021/ (accessed October 14, 2021).Google Scholar
Stubbs, P., & Zrinščak, S. (2019). Reforming welfare assemblages in semi-peripheral spaces: Understanding ‘drivers of inertia’ in Bosnia–Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia. In An, S., Chubarova, T., Deacon, B., & Stubbs, P. (Eds.), Social policy, poverty, and inequality in central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Agency and institutions in flux (pp. 285–305). Stuttgart: Ibidem-Verlag.Google Scholar
TransMonee. (2020). Monitoring the situation of children and women in Europe and Central Asia Database. http://transmonee.org/database/ (accessed October 20, 2021).Google Scholar
UNICEF. (2012). Investing in Early Childhood Education in Serbia: Costing Models for Ensuring Preschool Education for All. Belgrade: UNICEF Serbia.Google Scholar
Vanhercke, B., Ghailani, D., Spasova, S., & Pochet, P. (Eds.) (2020). Social policy in the European Union 1999–2019: The long and winding road. Brussels: ETUI.Google Scholar
Varga, M. (2021). Fathers on leave: Experiences of middle-class fathers on parental leave in the City of Zagreb. Revija za Socijalnu Politiku, 28(3), 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zrinščak, S. (2002). Socijalna i obiteljska politika u tranzicji. Revija za Socijalnu Politiku, 9(1), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar