Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:06:16.078Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Do stakeholders in Denmark know about social investment within long-term care?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2020

Bent Greve
Bent Greve*
Affiliation:
Department of Society and Globalisation, University of Roskilde, Roskilde, Denmark
*
CONTACT Bent Greve [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Social investment has become a buzzword in recent years. The concept is not always precise or being used in the same way in all European countries. The central tenet of the social investment approach is to treat public expenditures not just as an economic burden, but also as an investment in the future. This is also a part of the development in the discourse. The social investment perspective is an example of how new ideas might influence social policy development. However, the use of the concept at the political level does not imply that it is also known by stakeholders. The article explains the dichotomy between the use of a concept on an overarching political and academic level with a practical understanding among actors without using the concept. The article concludes that social investment can be used in the field and that actors have an understanding hereof.

Keywords

Social investmentstakeholdersNordic welfare stateslong-term care
Type
Article
Information
Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 127 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahn, S., & Kim, S. (2015). Social investment, social service and the economic performance of welfare states. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, D., et al. (2016). Velfærdsteknologi i plejeboliger, medarbejder og økonomisk perspektiv. København: SFI.Google Scholar
Beland, D. (2005). Ideas and social policy: An institutionalist perspective. Social Policy and Administration, 39(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beland, D. (2018). How ideas impact social policy. In Greve, B. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state (2nd ed.). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bouget, D., Frazer, H., Marlier, E., Sabato, S., & Vanhercke, B. (2015). Social investment in Europe. A study of national policies. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Cantillon, B. (2011). The paradox of the social investment state: Growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era. Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 432–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, M. (2017). Social return on investment (SROI), including elements on cost-benefit analysis. In Greve, B. (Ed.), Handbook of social policy evaluation (pp. 57–76). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, T., Forster, A., Young, J., Brown, L., Ozer, S., Smith, J. … Greenwood, D. C. (2013). Physical rehabilitation for older people in long-tem care (review). Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, .(2), DC004294. http://cochranelibrarywiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004294.pub3/fullCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. (2012). Making policy for care: Experience in Europe and its implications in Asia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 32(11/12), 623–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debels, A., & Hoyweghen, I. (2018). Prevention: The cases of social security and health care. In Greve, B. (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of the welfare state. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Deken, J. (2014). Identifying the skeleton of the social investment state: Defining and measuring patterns of social policy change on the basis of expenditure data. In Cantillon, B., & Vandenbroucke, F. (Eds.), Reconciling work and poverty reduction, how successful are European welfare states? (pp. 260–285). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Deusdad, B., Pace, C., & Anttonen, A. (2016). Facing the challenges in the development of long-term care for older people in Europe in the context of an economic crisis. Journal of Social Service Research, 42(2), 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission. (2013). Social investment package. Brussels: EU.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2016). Joint report on health care and long-term care systems & fiscal sustainability. Institutional Paper 037. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Greve, B. (Ed.). 2017. Long-term care for the elderly in Europe. Development and prospects. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Greve, B., & Poskute, V. (2017). Long-term care in Denmark and Lithuania – A most dissimilar case. Social Policy & Administration, 4, 659–675.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. (2006, June). Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children. Science, 312, 1900–1902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemerijck, A. (2015). The quiet paradigm revolution of social investment. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(2), 242–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, B. (2013). Ethical challenges with welfare technology: A review of the literature. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 389–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hudson, J., & Kühner, S. (2009). Towards productive welfare? A comparative analysis of 23 OECD countries. Journal of European Social Policy, 19(1), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenson, J. (2009). Lost in translation: The social investment perspective and gender equality. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 16(4), 446–483. doi: 10.1093/sp/jxp019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kjellberg, J., & Ibsen, R. (2016). Rehabiliterende hjemmepleje efter Roskilde-modellen. En analyse af de økonomiske konsekvenser af Roskilde-modellen for rehabilitering. København: KORA.Google Scholar
Kjellberg, P. K., Ibsen, R., & Kjellberg, J. (2011). Fra pleje og omsorg til rehabilitering. Erfaringer fra Frederica Kommune. København: DSI.Google Scholar
Kolev, A., & Tassot, C. (2016). Can investments in social protection contribute to subjective well-being? A cross-country analysis. OECD Development Centre, working paper no. 332, Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Kuitto, K. (2016). From social security to social investment? Compensating and social investment welfare policies in a life-course perspective. Journal of European Social Policy, 26(5), 442–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kümpers, S., et al. (2010). Prevention and rehabilitation within long-term care across Europe. Berlin: Interlinks.Google Scholar
Leech, N., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2009). A Typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahon, R. (2013). Social investment according to the OECD/DELSA: A discourse in the making. Global Policy, 4(2), 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandag Morgen. (2017, March). Sociale investeringer tager fart – millioner kan spares. Mandag Morgen, no. 12.Google Scholar
Midgley, J. (1999, March). Growth, redistribution and welfare: Toward social investment. Social Service Review, 73, 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, B. (2013). What use is ‘social investment’? Journal of European Social Policy, 23(5), 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piven, F. F. (2015). Neoliberalism and the welfare state. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 31(1), 2–9. doi: 10.1080/21699763.2014.1001665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabato, S., & Vanhercke, B. (2014). About the baby and the bathwater: Assess the European platform against poverty. Working Paper, 2014.09, ETUI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, P., & Deeming, C. (2016). The ‘social investment perspective’ in social policy: A longue Durée perspective. Social Policy & Administration, 50, 673–690. doi: 10.1111/spol.12255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Socialministeriet. (2000). Social Politik som investering. Socialpolitisk Redegørelse 2000. København: Socialministeriet.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2008). The new welfare state settlement in Europe. European Societies, 10(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P., Gumy, J., & Otto, A. (2015). Can ‘new welfare’ address poverty through more and better jobs? Journal of Social Policy, 44(1), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaalavuo, M. (2013). The redistributive impact of ‘old’ and ‘new’ social spending. Journal of Social Policy, 42(3), 513–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandenbroucke, F., & Vleminckx, K. (2011). Disappointing poverty trends: Is the social investment state to blame? Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 450–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Kerbergen, K., & Hemerijck, A. (2012). Two decades of change in Europe: The emergence of the social investment state. Journal of Social Policy, 41(3), 475–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Vliet, O., & Wang, C. (2015). Social investment and poverty reduction: A comparative analysis across fifteen European countries. Journal of Social Policy, 44(3), 611–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar