Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:20:42.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Peasants as a Revolutionary Class: An Early Latin American View

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Harry E. Vanden
Harry E. Vanden*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We do not regard Marx's theory as something completed and inviolable; on the contrary, we are convinced that it has only laid the foundation stone of the science which socialists must develop in all directions if they wish to keep pace with life.

V. I. Lenin (Our Program)

The peasant is one of the least understood and most abused actors on the modern political stage. He is maligned for his political passivity and distrust of national political movements. Yet, most of the great twentieth-century revolutions in the Third World have, according to most scholars, been peasant based (Landsberger, 1973: ix; Wolf, 1969). In Latin America the peasant was once pictured as the archetypical parochial who was more suited for siestas under his sombrero than serious political activity. Stereotypes aside, the region has been no exception to the growing tendency of peasants to become involved in major revolutionary processes.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , May 1978 , pp. 191 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © University of Miami 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blanco, R. (1972) Land or Death: The Peasant Struggle in Peru. New York: Pathfinder.Google Scholar
Chang-Rodriguez, E. (1957) La literatura política de González Prada, Mariátegui y Haya de la Torre. México: Colección Studium-18.Google Scholar
La Correspondencia Sudamericana (1929) El movimiento revolucionario Latinoamericano. Buenos Aires: La Correspondencia Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Debray, R. (1967) Revolution in the Revolution. New York: Grove.Google Scholar
Espinoza, E. [Samuel Glusberg] (1932) Trincera. Buenos Aires: BABEL.Google Scholar
Falcon, J. (1923) Letter to a group of Peruvian Socialists (September 15).Google Scholar
Gruber, H. [ed.] (1974) Soviet Russia Masters the Comintern. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Handelman, H. (1975) Struggle in the Andes. Latin American Monograph Series No. 35. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Humbert-Dorz, J. (1968) L'origine de l'Internationele Communiste. Boundry. France: Baconniere.Google Scholar
Jorrin, M. and Martz, J. D. (1970) Latin American Political Thought and Ideology. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Landsberger, H. A. [ed.] (1973) Rural Protest: Peasant Movements and Social Change. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
Lenin, V. I. (1971) Selected Works (one vol.). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Tse-Tung, Mao (1965) Selected Works (four vols.). Peking: Foreign Language Press.Google Scholar
Mariategui, J. C. (1973) Acerca del carácter de la sociedad peruana. Lima: No Publishers.Google Scholar
Mariategui, J. C. (1971a) Historia de la crisis mundial. Vol. 8, Obras Completas. Lima: Biblioteca Amauta.Google Scholar
Mariategui, J. C. (1971b) [Translation of 1928 edition, 7 ensayos en interpretación de la realidad peruana] Seven Interpretive Essays on Peruvian Reality. [M. Urquidi tr.] Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Mariategui, J. C. (1969) Ideología y política. Vol. 13, Obras Completas. Lima: Biblioteca Amauta.Google Scholar
Mariategui, J. C. (1929a) “El Ayllu.” Labor (Lima) 10 (September 7): 7Google Scholar
Mariategui, J. C. (1929b) Letter to Nicanor A. de la Fuente (June 20).Google Scholar
Mariategui, J. C. (1929c) Letter to M. Arroyo Posadas (June 5).Google Scholar
Mariategui, J. C. (1928) “Sobre el problema indigena.” Labor (Lima) 1 (Novemer 10): 6. [ed.] (1926-1930) Amauta. Lima.Google Scholar
Martinez de la Torre, R. (1947) Apuntes para una interpretación Marxistadela historia social del Peru (four vols.). Lima: Empresa Editora Peruana.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1959) The Communist Manifesto in Lewis S. Feuer, Marx and Engels, Basic Writings. Garden City: Anchor Books, Doubleday.Google Scholar
Miroschevsky, V. (1942) El populismo en el Perú. Dialéctica (Havana) I (May-June): 41-59.Google Scholar
Mitrany, D. (1951) Marx Against the Peasant. Chapel Hill: Univ. of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Portocarrero, J. (1974) Interview with Julio Portocarrero (August 25).Google Scholar
Prado J., del (1946) Mariátegui y su obra. Lima: Ediciones Nuevo Horizonte.Google Scholar
Schram, S. R. (1969) The Political Thought of Mao Tse-Tung. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Seminov, S. and Schulgovsky, A. (1960) “El papel de José Carlos Mariátegui en la formación del partido comunista del Perú.” Hora del Hombre (Lima) 1 (January): 65-82.Google Scholar
Vanden, H. E. (1977) “Marx and the peasantry in Latin America: marginalization or mobilization.” Presented at 1977 SECÓLAS meeting, (mimeo)Google Scholar
Vanden, H. E. (1975) Mariátegui: influencias en su formación ideológica. Lima: Biblioteca Amauta.Google Scholar
Whyte, W. F. (1976) “Rural Peru: peasants and activists,” pp. 241–251 in Chaplin, David (ed.) Peruvian Nationalism, a Corporatist Revolution. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Wolf, E. R. (1969) Peasant Wars of the Twentieth Century. New York: Harper & Row..Google Scholar