Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:16:14.134Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The tortoise and the hare: how North's institutional ideas resolved a 19th century Australian fable

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 August 2016

DARREN O'CONNELL  and
SIOBHAN AUSTEN
DARREN O'CONNELL*
Affiliation:
Sydney Harbour Foreshore Authority, Sydney, Australia
SIOBHAN AUSTEN*
Affiliation:
School of Economics and Finance, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
*
*Email: [email protected]
**Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Our paper adopts Douglass North's institutional framework to explain why the colonies of Western Australia and South Australia, established in 1829 and 1836, respectively, had considerable disparities in economic growth up the end of 1900. Both colonies were established under different modes of organisation (colonisation). The method adopted for WA harked back to Mercantilism, famously condemned by Adam Smith because it led to under-investment in, and over-exploitation of, colonial assets. SA on the other hand was the product of a radical new theory in colonisation proposed by Edward Gibbon Wakefield whereby land, instead of being given away as in WA, was sold at a fixed price with the proceeds being used to subsidise gender-balanced immigration. Outcomes suggest that SA's method of ‘systematic colonisation’ introduced a better institutional matrix, compared to the initial institutions seeded in WA, allowing SA's economy to develop sooner and at a higher rate of growth. However, once the detrimental effects of its method of foundation were eliminated, occurring on the eve of one of the largest gold discoveries of modern times, WA's institutions finally provided the necessary incentives for economic development such that by the end of 1900, it had equalled SA's level of economic output if not exceeded it.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 1: Douglass C. North Memorial Issue , March 2017 , pp. 161 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, A. (2001), ‘The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation’, The American Economic Review, 91 (5): 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, L., Libecap, G., and Schnieder, R. (2008), ‘Violence and Assessment of Property Rights on Two Brazilian Frontiers’, in Garfinkel, M. and Skaperdas, S. (eds.), The Political Economy of Conflict and Appropriation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Appleyard, R. (1981), ‘Economic and Demographic Growth 1850–1914’, in Stannage, C. T. (ed.), A New History of Western Australia, Nedlands: University of Western Australia Press, p. 216.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics (1989), ‘Colonial Statistics: Catalogue of Australian Statistical Publications, 1804 to 1901’, http://www.ausstats.abs.gov.au/ausstats/free.nsf/0/CEEE911131AC85E5CA25743D0013801B/$File/11150_1804-1901.pdf (accessed February 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Bowle, J. (1974), The Imperial Achievement: The Rise and Transformation of the British Empire, Boston: Brown, Little.Google Scholar
Burvill, G. H. (1979), ‘The First Sixty Year, 1829–1889’, in Burvill, G. H. (ed.), Agriculture in W.A. 1829–1979, Perth: UWA Press.Google Scholar
Butlin, S. J. (1968), Foundations of the Australian Monetary System: 1788–1851, Sydney: University of Sydney Library.Google Scholar
Butlin, S. J. (1986), The Australian Monetary System: 1851–1914, Sydney: University of Sydney Library.Google Scholar
Butlin, N. G. (1994), Forming a Colonial Economy: Australia 1810–1850, London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, F. K. (1960), Australia's Western Third, London: MacMillan & Co.Google Scholar
Darwin, J. (2012), Unfinished Empire: The Global Expansion of Britain, London: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Eggertson, T. (1990), Economic Behaviour and Institutions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, B. (1949), The British Empire in Australia: An Economic History, 1834–1939, Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1983), The Macquarie Book of Events, Netley: Griffin Press Limited.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. (2005), ‘The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1): 33–50.Google Scholar
Haita, C. (2006), ‘Institutions in Economics: Essay on Definition and Importance’, http://www.personal.ceu.hu/students/05/Corina_Haita/cntrth-paper.pdf (accessed August 31, 2011).Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2000), ‘What is the Essence of Institutional Economics?’, Journal of Economic Issues, 34 (2): 327.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2006), ‘What are Institutions?’, Journal of Economic Issues, XL (1): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, J. E. (1920), Registration of Title to Land Throughout the Empire, Toronto: The Carswell Company.Google Scholar
Keneally, T. (2009), Australians: Origins to Eureka, London: Allen & Unwin, pp. 374–385.Google Scholar
Kittrell, E. R. (1965), ‘The Development of the theory of Colonisation in English Classical Political Economy’, Southern Economic Journal, 31 (3): 189–206.Google Scholar
Kittrell, E. R. (1973), ‘Wakefield's Scheme of Systematic Colonization and Classical Economics’, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 32 (1): 87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, M., Mahoney, J., and vom Hau, M. (2006), ‘Colonialism and Development: A Comparative Analysis of Spanish and British Colonies’, American Journal of Sociology, 111 (5): 1412–1462.Google Scholar
Leadbeater, M. M. (2011), ‘Credit Selection of Land: South Australia’, http://www.ach.familyhistorysa.info/land.html (accessed August 3, 2012).Google Scholar
Lloyd, C. (n.d.), Institutional Patterns of the Settler Societies: Hybrid, Parallel, and Convergent, Armidale: University of New England Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. [1867](1999), ‘Das Kapital’, http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/index.htm (accessed May 6, 2012).Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1848), Principles of Political Economy with Some of their Applications to Social Philiosophy, London: John W. Parker.Google Scholar
Mokyr, J. (2009), The Enlightened Economy: Britain and the Industrial Revolution, 1700–1850, London: Penguin Book, p. 414.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. (1994), ‘Economic Performance through Time’, The American Economic Review, 84 (3): 363.Google Scholar
North, D. (2005), Understanding the Process of Economic Change, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. and Davis, L. (1971), Institutional Change and American Economic Growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, J. P. (2000), ‘How, Then, Does One Get There? An Institutionalist Response to Herr Fischer's Vision for a European Federation’, ARENA Working Papers WP00/22, 2000.Google Scholar
Paltseva, E. and Roine, J. (2011), ‘Are Natural Resources Good or Bad for Development?’, http://freepolicybriefs.org/2011/11/21/are-natural-resources-good-or-bad-for-development/ (accessed July 2, 2013).Google Scholar
Pappe, H. O. (1951), ‘Wakefield and Marx’, The Economic History Review, 4 (1): 88–97.Google Scholar
Parto, S. (2005), ‘Economic Activity and Institutions: Taking Stock’, Journal of Economic Issues, 39 (1): 31.Google Scholar
Prados de la Escosura, L. and Smits, J. P. (2007), ‘Decolonisation and Longrun Economics Performance: Comparing Africa and Latin America’, http://www.ekh.lu.se/ehes/sublevel/sessions.asp (accessed February 26, 2008).Google Scholar
Productivity Commission (2002), ‘Pastoral Leases and Non-Pastoral Land Use’, http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/8219/pastoralleases.pdf (accessed September 25, 2012).Google Scholar
Richards, E. (1986), The Flinders History of South Australia: Social History, Netley: Wakefield Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, N. (2006), The Corporation that changed the World: How the East India Company Shaped the Modern Multinational, London: The Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. H. (1924), History of Australian Land Settlement, 1788–1920, Melbourne: McMillan and Co.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M. (1994), Institutions in Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, R. W. (2001), Institutions and Organisations, London: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
Smith, A. [1776](1976), Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, in Cannan, E. (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
South Australia (2008), ‘The Torrens Title System’, http://www.landservices.sa.gov.au/1public/education_careers/_documentary_movies/4what_is_the_torrens_title_system.asp (accessed September 16, 2012).Google Scholar
Statham, P. (1981), ‘Swan River Colony 1829–1880’, in Stannage, C. T. (ed.), A New History of Western Australia, Nedlands: University of Western Australia Press.Google Scholar
Vamplew, W. ed. (1987), Australians: Historical Statistics, Sydney: Fairfax, Syme and Weldon.Google Scholar
Vamplew, W., Richards, E., Jaensch, D., and Hancock, J. (1983), South Australian Historical Statistics, Kensington: University of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Whimpress, A. (2008), ‘The Wakefield Model of Systematic Colonisation in South Australia: An Examination with Particular Reference to its Economic Aspects’, http://ura.unisa.edu.au/R/?func=dbin-jumpfull&object_id=56760 (accessed May 1, 2014).Google Scholar
Zouboulakis, M. (2005), ‘On the Evolutionary Character of North's Idea of Institutional Change’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 1 (2): 1–15.Google Scholar