Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T09:45:49.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Routines as multilevel mechanisms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2010

JACK J. VROMEN
JACK J. VROMEN*
Affiliation:
EIPE, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 3000 DR, The Netherlands
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

It is argued that routines can be fruitfully conceived of as multilevel mechanisms. The merits of viewing routines as multilevel mechanisms are that it helps in putting together a coherent picture of what routines are, what routines do, and how they do it. In particular, it helps in getting a clearer picture of how skills and routines are ontologically (rather than metaphorically) related to each other. It allows us to see that while routines are generative mechanisms producing recurrent patterns of firm behavior, as multilevel mechanisms they themselves are at the same time recurrent patterns of interaction within firms. Because of its ‘behavioral’ spirit, viewing routines as multilevel mechanisms (rather than as, for example, unobservable dispositions of firms to energize patterns of behavior in firms) greatly facilitates further empirical research on crucial, as yet unresolved issues, such as how stable and robust routines are and to what extent firm behavior is routine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 7 , Special Issue 2: Business Routines , June 2011 , pp. 175 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, P., Felin, T., and Foss, N. J. (2008), ‘Building Microfoundations for the Routines, Capabilities, and Performance Links’, Managerial and Decision Economics, 29: 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. C. (2004), ‘Organizational Routines: A Review of the Literature’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 13 (4): 643–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. C. (2005), ‘A Framework for Applying Organizational Routines in Empirical Research: Linking Antecedents, Characteristics, and Performance Outcomes of Recurrent Interaction Patterns’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (5): 817–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, M. C., Lazaric, N., Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. G. (2005), ‘Applying Organizational Routines in Understanding Organizational Change’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (5): 775–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (2005), ‘Explanation: A Mechanist Alternative’, in Craver, C. F. and Darden, L. (eds.), ‘Special Issue: Mechanisms in Biology’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36: 421–441.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. and Bacdayan, P. (1994), ‘Organizational Routines are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study’, Organization Science, 5: 554–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. D., Burkhart, R., Dosi, G., Egidi, M., Marengo, L., Warglien, M., and Winter, S. (1996), ‘Routines and Other Recurring Action Patterns of Organizations: Contemporary Research Issues’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 5: 653–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, C. F. (2007), Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craver, C. and Bechtel, W. (2007), ‘Top–Down Causation without Top–Down Causes’, Biology and Philosophy, 22 (4): 547–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R. (1975), ‘Functional Analysis’, Journal of Philosophy, 72: 741–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R. (2000), ‘How Does It Work? vs. What Are the Laws? Two Conceptions of Psychological Explanation’, in Keil, F. and Wilson, R. (eds.), Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darden, L. (2001), ‘Discovering Mechanisms: A Computational Philosophy of Science Perspective’, in Jantke, K. P. and Shinohara, A. (eds.), Discovery Science, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference, New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976), The Selfish Gene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1989), Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (1998), ‘A Plea for Mechanisms’, in Hedstrom, P. and Swedberg, R. (eds.), Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 45–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. (2007), Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. S. and Pentland, B. T. (2003), ‘Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 94–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2005), ‘Strategic Organization: A Field in Search of Micro-Foundations’, Strategic Organization, 3: 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Foss, N. J. (2006), ‘Individuals and Organizations: Further Thoughts on a Microfoundations Project’, in Ketchen, D. and Bergh, D. (eds.), Research Methodology in Strategy and Management 3, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 253–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felin, T. and Hesterly, W. S. (2007), ‘The Knowledge-Based View, Nested Heterogeneity, and New Value Creation: Philosophical Considerations on the Locus of Knowledge’, Academy of Management Review, 32: 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennan, S. S. (1996), ‘Mechanisms and the Nature of Causation’, Erkenntnis, 44: 49–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glennan, S. S. (2002), ‘Rethinking Mechanistic Explanation’, Philosophy of Science (Supplement), 69: S342–S353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. (2008), ‘The Concept of a Routine’, in Becker, M. C. (ed.), Handbook of Organizational Routines, Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, pp. 15–28.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2004), ‘The Firm as an Interactor: Firms as Vehicles for Habits and Routines’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14 (3), 281–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. and Knudsen, T. (2006), ‘Why We Need a Generalized Darwinism, and Why Generalized Darwinism is not Enough’, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61 (1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, E. L. (1995), Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992), ‘Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology’, Organization Science, 3: 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1986), ‘The Powers of Association’, in Law, J. (ed.), Power, Action and Belief, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 264–280.Google Scholar
Levitt, B. and March, J. (1988), ‘Organizational Learning’, Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machamer, P., Darden, L., and Craver, C. F. (2000), ‘Thinking about Mechanisms’, Philosophy of Science, 67: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (2007), ‘Universal Darwinism and Evolutionary Social Science’, Biology and Philosophy, 22 (1): 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Feldman, M. S. (2005), ‘Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 14 (5): 793–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentland, B. T. and Rueter, H. (1994), ‘Organisational Routines as Grammars of Action’, Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 39: 484–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1969), The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sugden, R. (1986), The Evolution of Rights, Cooperation, and Welfare, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vromen, J. J. (1995), Economic Evolution: An Enquiry into the Foundations of New Institutional Economics, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vromen, J. J. (2004), ‘Conjectural Revisionary Economic Ontology: Outline of an Ambitious Research Agenda for Evolutionary Economics’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 11 (2): 213–247.Google Scholar
Vromen, J. J. (2006), ‘Routines, Genes and Program-based Behaviour’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 16 (5): 543–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vromen, J. J. (2007), ‘Neuroeconomics as a Natural Extension of Bioeconomics: The Shifting Scope of Standard Economic Theory’, Journal of Bioeconomics, 9: 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vromen, J. J. (2008), ‘Advancing Evolutionary Explanations in Economics’, in Kincaid, H., and Ross, D. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on Philosophy of Science on Economics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 337–368.Google Scholar
Vromen, J. J. (2009), ‘Microfoundations in Strategic Management? Squaring Coleman's Diagram’ (forthcoming in Erkenntnis).Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (1994), ‘The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets’, in Matthen, M. and Ware, R. (eds.), ‘Biology and Society: Reflections on Methodology’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 20: 207–274.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. C. (2007), Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, H. P. (1998), Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar