Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:47:01.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rise and decline of nations: the dynamic properties of institutional reform1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2017

RUSSELL S. SOBEL
RUSSELL S. SOBEL*
Affiliation:
School of Business, The Citadel, Charleston, SCUSA
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While it is now well established in the literature that countries with better policies and institutions, as measured by the Economic Freedom of the World index, have better outcomes in terms of prosperity, growth, and measures of human well-being. However, we know little about the process of institutional reform – that is why and how country policies undergo major changes either upward or downward in their levels of economic freedom. This research attempts to provide a systematic overview of this process, by uncovering what the data really show about this transition process. Institutional declines occur more abruptly than institutional improvements, and free trade appears to be a key ‘first mover’ in cases of large institutional change.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Institutional Economics , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 2017 , pp. 549 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © Millennium Economics Ltd 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

I would like to thank Texas Tech University for financial support as a Templeton Visiting Scholar while completing this research. I would also like to thank three anonymous referees, William Trumbull, Robert Lawson, Randall Holcombe, and seminar participants at Texas Tech University, Oklahoma State University, College of Charleston, and the Southern Economic Association for helpful comments and suggestions.

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. (2001), ‘The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development’, American Economic Review, 91 (5): 1369–1401.Google Scholar
Anderson, T. and Hill, P. (1980), The Birth of a Transfer Society, Stanford: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Baumol, W. (1990), ‘Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive and Destructive’, Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5): 893–921.Google Scholar
Berggren, N. (2003), ‘The Benefits of Economic Freedom: A Survey’, The Independent Review, 8 (2): 193–211.Google Scholar
Boettke, P. (2001), Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bologna, J., Lacombe, D., and Young, A. (2016), ‘A Spatial Analysis of Incomes and Institutional Quality: Evidence from US Metropolitan Areas’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12 (1): 191–216.Google Scholar
Collier, P. (2010), ‘The Political Economy of Natural Resources’, Social Research, 77 (4): 1105–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coyne, C. (2008), After War: The Political Economy of Exporting Democracy, California: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coyne, C. and Sobel, R. S. (2010), ‘How are Institutions Related?’, Chapter 3 in Gwartney, J. and Lawson, R. (eds.), Economic Freedom of the World: 2010 Annual Report, Vancouver: The Fraser Institute, pp. 163–174.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. (1998), ‘Institutions, Investment, and Growth: New Cross-Country and Panel Data Evidence’, Economic Inquiry, 36: 603–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, J. (2003), ‘Causality in the Freedom-Growth Relationship’, European Journal of Political Economy, 19 (3): 479–495.Google Scholar
De Haan, J., Lundstrom, S., and Sturm, J. (2006), ‘Market-Oriented Institutions and Policies and Economic Growth: A Critical Survey’, Journal of Economic Surveys, 20 (2): 157–191.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. (2001), The Elusive Quest for Growth. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. (2014), Tyranny of Experts. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (1997), ‘Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4): 1203–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easton, S. and Walker, M. (1997), ‘Income, Growth, and Economic Freedom’, American Economic Review, 87 (2): 328–332.Google Scholar
Fischer, S. and Gelb, A. (1991), ‘The Process of Socialist Economic Transformation’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (4): 91–105.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1962), Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gehring, K. (2013), ‘Who Benefits from Economic Freedom? Unraveling the Effect of Economic Freedom on Subjective Well-Being’, World Development, 50: 74–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaeser, E., Laporta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2004), ‘Do Institutions Cause Growth?’, Journal of Economic Growth, 9 (3): 271–303.Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. and Shleifer, A. (2002), ‘Legal Origins’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (4): 1193–1229.Google Scholar
Grubel, H. (1998), ‘Economic Freedom and Human Welfare: Some Empirical Findings’, Cato Journal, 18 (2): 287–304.Google Scholar
Gwartney, J., Holcombe, R., and Lawson, R. (2004), ‘Economic Freedom, Institutional Quality, and Cross-Country Differences in Income and Growth’, Cato Journal, 24 (3): 205–233.Google Scholar
Gwartney, J., Holcombe, R., and Lawson, R. (2006), ‘Institutions and the Impact of Investment on Growth’, Kyklos, 59 (2): 255–273.Google Scholar
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., and Hall, J. (2015), Economic Freedom of the World 2015 Annual Report, Vancouver, B.C.: Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
Gwartney, J., Lawson, R., and Holcombe, R. (1999), ‘Economic Freedom and the Environment for Economic Growth’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 155: 643–663.Google Scholar
Gwartney, J., Stroup, R., Sobel, R. S., and Macpherson, D. (2015), Economics: Private and Public Choice, 15th Edition., Stamford, CT: South-Western Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Hall, J. and Lawson, R. (2014), ‘Economic Freedom of the World: An Accounting of the Literature’, Contemporary Economic Policy, 32 (1): 1–19.Google Scholar
Hall, J., Sobel, R. S., and Crowley, G. (2010), ‘Institutions, Capital, and Growth’, Southern Economic Journal, 77 (2): 385–405.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1944 [1994]), The Road to Serfdom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1945), ‘The Use of Knowledge in Society’, American Economic Review, 35 (4): 519–530.Google Scholar
Heckelman, J. (2000), ‘Economic Freedom and Economic Growth: A Short-run Causal Investigation’, Journal of Applied Economics, 3: 71–91.Google Scholar
Heckelman, J. and Knack, S. (2009), ‘Aid, Economic Freedom, and Growth’, Contemporary Economic Policy, 27 (1): 46–53.Google Scholar
Heybey, B. and Murrel, P. (1999), ‘The Relationship between Economic Growth and the Speed of Liberalization During Transition’, Journal of Policy Reform, 3 (2): 121–137.Google Scholar
Higgs, R. (1987), Crisis and Leviathan Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holcombe, R. (1992), ‘The Distributive Model of Government: Evidence from the Confederate Constitution’, Southern Economic Journal, 58 (3): 762–769.Google Scholar
Holcombe, R. (1999), ‘Veterans Interests and the Transition to Government Growth: 1870-1915’, Public Choice, 99 (3/4): 311–326.Google Scholar
Holcombe, R. (2002), From Liberty to Democracy: The Transformation of American Government, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Holcombe, R. and Boudreaux, C. (2016), ‘Market Institutions and Income Inequality’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 12 (2): 263–276.Google Scholar
Husted, T. and Kenny, L. (1997), ‘The Effect of the Expansion of the Voting Franchise on the Size of Government’, Journal of Political Economy, 105 (1): 54–82.Google Scholar
Kolodko, G. (2000), From Shock to Therapy: Political Economy of Postsocialist Transformation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreft, S. and Sobel, R. S. (2005), ‘Public Policy, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Freedom’, Cato Journal, 25 (3): 595–616.Google Scholar
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., and Shleifer, A. (2008), ‘The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins’, Journal of Economic Literature, 46 (2): 285–332.Google Scholar
Lawson, R. and Clark, J. (2010), ‘Examining the Hayek-Friedman Hypothesis on Economic and Political Freedom’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 74 (3): 230–239.Google Scholar
Leeson, P. (2007), ‘Better Off Stateless: Somalia Before and After Government Collapse’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 35 (4): 689–710.Google Scholar
Leeson, P. and Coyne, C. (2012), ‘Sassywood’, Journal of Comparative Economics, 40 (4): 608–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeson, P., Sobel, R. S., and Dean, A. (2012), ‘Comparing the Spread of Capitalism and Democracy’, Economics Letters, 114 (1): 139–141.Google Scholar
March, R., Lyford, C., and Powell, B. (2015), ‘Causes and Barriers to Increases in Economic Freedom’, Working Paper.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, A. and Richard, S. (1981), ‘A Rational Theory of the Size of Government’, Journal of Political Economy, 89 (5): 914–927.Google Scholar
Murphy, K., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. (1992), ‘The Transition to a Market Economy: Pitfalls of Partial Reform’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107: 889–906.Google Scholar
Murrell, P. (1992), ‘Evolutionary and Radical Approaches to Economic Reform’, Economics of Planning, 25: 79–95.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
North, D. (1991), ‘Institutions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (1): 97–112.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1982), The Rise and Decline of Nations, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Peltzman, S. (1980), ‘The Growth of Government’, Journal of Law and Economics, 23 (2): 209–287.Google Scholar
Pitlik, H. and Wirth, S. (2003), ‘Do Crises Promote the Extent of Economic Liberalization: An Empirical Test’, European Journal of Political Economy, 19 (3): 565–581.Google Scholar
Powell, B. and Ryan, M. (2006), ‘Does Development Aid Lead to Economic Freedom?’, Journal of Private Enterprise, 22 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
Robinson, J., Acemoglu, D., and Johnson, S. (2005), ‘Institutions as a Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth’, Handbook of Economic Growth, 1A: 386–472.Google Scholar
Roland, G. (1994), ‘On the Speed and Sequencing of Privatisation and Restructuring’, Economic Journal, 104 (426): 1158–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. (1996), ‘The Transition at Mid-Decade’, American Economic Review, 86: 128–133.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. and Warner, A. (1999), ‘The Big Rush, Natural Resource Booms and Growth’, Journal of Development Economics, 59 (1): 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scully, G. (October 2002), ‘Economic Freedom, Government Policy and the Trade-off Between Equity and Economic Growth’, Public Choice, 113 (1): 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shleifer, A. and Treisman, D. (2005), ‘A Normal Country: Russia After Communism’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19 (1): 151–174.Google Scholar
Smith, A. (1776 [1976]), An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sobel, R. S. (2008), ‘Testing Baumol: Institutional Quality and the Productivity of Entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Venturing, 23 (6): 641–655.Google Scholar
Sobel, R. S., Clark, J., and Lee, D. (2007), ‘Freedom, Barriers to Entry, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Progress’, Review of Austrian Economics, 20: 221–236.Google Scholar
Sobel, R. S. and Coyne, C. (2011), ‘Cointegrating Institutions: The Time-Series Properties of Country Institutional Measures’, Journal of Law and Economics, 54 (1): 111–134.Google Scholar
Sobel, R. S. and Leeson, P. (2007), ‘The Spread of Global Freedom’, Chapter 2 in Gwartney, James D. and Lawson, Robert A. (eds.), Economic Freedom of the World: 2007 Annual Report, Vancouver: The Fraser Institute.Google Scholar
Young, A. and Bologna, J. (2016), ‘Crises and Government: Some Empirical Evidence’, Contemporary Economic Policy, 34 (2): 234–249 Google Scholar