Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:23:34.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

John Commons's organizational theory of institutions: a discussion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2011

BERNARD CHAVANCE*
Affiliation:
Département d'Économie, LADYSS, Université Paris Diderot, UFR GHSS, 59 rue Nationale, 75013 Paris, France

Abstract:

The paper discusses John R. Commons's original theory of institutions, where the latter are defined as going concerns and their working rules, or collective action restraining and expanding individual action. Such organizational approach of institutions makes important contributions to institutional economics in general, through its notion of a hierarchy of collective action, its threefold typology of transactions, and its holindividualist stance. Commons's genuine advances are counterbalanced by theoretical limits, which illustrate the unfinished character of his attempt to make a contribution to a ‘rounded-out theory of Political economy’, e.g. the ambiguous place of markets in his theory, the state understood as a model for other going concerns and, distinctly, the restricted definition of institutions as organizations. In some important respects, his theory complements or goes further than other currents of institutional economics; its weak points are sometimes the reverse side of his very contributions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agassi, J. (1975), ‘Institutional Individualism’, British Journal of Sociology, 26 (2): 144155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, A. and Ramstad, Y. (1997), ‘The Social Psychological Underpinnings of Commons's Institutional Economics: The Significance of Dewey's Human Nature and Conduct, Journal of Economic Issues, XXXI (4): 881916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazzoli, L. (1999), L'économie politique de J. R. Commons: Essai sur l'institutionnalisme en sciences sociales (The Political Economy of J. R. Commons: An Essay on Institutionalism in Social Sciences), Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Biddle, J. (1990), ‘Purpose and Evolution in Commons's Institutionalism’, History of Political Economy, 22 (1): 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, R. and Saillard, Y. (eds.) (2002), Régulation Theory: The State of the Art, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chavance, B. (2008a), Institutional Economics, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chavance, B. (2008b), ‘Formal and Informal Institutional Change: The Experience of Postsocialist Transformation’, European Journal of Comparative Economics, 5 (1): 5771.Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1899–1900), A Sociological View of Sovereignty, New York: Augustus Kelley (Reprinted in 1967).Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1924), The Legal Foundations of Capitalism, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press (Reprinted in 1968).Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1934a), Institutional Economics. Its Place in Political Economy, 2 vols., New Brunswick and London: Transactions Publishers (Reprinted in 1990).Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1934b), Myself. The Autobiography of John R. Commons, Madison: The University of Madison Press (Reprinted in 1964).Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1950), The Economics of Collective Action, ed. Kenneth H. Parsons, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press (Reprinted in 1970).Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1996a), ‘Law and Economics’, in Rutherford, M. and Samuels, W. (eds.), John R. Commons: Selected Essays, vol. 2, London: Routledge, 331342 (Reprinted from Commons, J. R. (1925), ‘Law and Economics’, Yale Law Journal, 34: 371–382).Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1996b), ‘Institutional Economics’, in Rutherford, M. and Samuels, W. (eds.), John R. Commons: Selected Essays, vol. 2, London: Routledge, 443452 (Reprinted from Commons, J. R. (1931), ‘Institutional Economics’, American Economic Review, 21(3): 648–657).Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (1996c), ‘Institutional Economics’, in Rutherford, M. and Samuels, W. (eds.), John R. Commons: Selected Essays, vol. 2, London: Routledge, 487500 (Reprinted from Commons, J. R. (1936), ‘Institutional Economics’, American Economic Review, 26(1): 237–249).Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. (2009), ‘Marx To-Day: Capitalism and Socialism’, Journal of Institutional Economics, 5 (1): 117136 (Reprinted from Commons, J. R. (1925), ‘Marx To-Day: Capitalism and Socialism’, Atlantic Monthly, November, 682–693).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, M. A. (1936), ‘Commons's Institutionalism in Relation to the Problem of Social Evolution and Economic Planning’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 50 (2): 333346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorito, L. (2010), ‘John R. Commons, Wesley N. Hohfeld, and the Origins of Transactional Economics’, History of Political Economy, 42 (2): 267295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinberg, M. (2001), ‘Un cheval est-il un cheval? Les mots, les faits, le capitalisme et le droit (A Horse is a Horse? Words, Facts, Capitalism and the Law)’, Cahiers d'économie politique, 40–41: 177191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. (1973), Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 1, ‘Rules and Orders’, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2003), ‘John R. Commons and the Foundations of Institutional Economics’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXVII (3): 547576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, G. (2007), ‘Meanings of Methodological Individualism’, Journal of Economic Methodology, 14 (2): 211226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langlois, R. (1989), ‘What Was Wrong with the Old Institutional Economics (and What is Still Wrong with the New)?’, Review of Political Economy, 1 (3): 270298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, C. (1996), ‘Holism and Collectivism in the Work of J.R. Commons’, Journal of Economic Issues, XXX (4): 967984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazonick, W. (1993), Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K. and Engels, F. (1998), The German Ideology, Amherst: Prometheus Books, p. 576.Google Scholar
North, D. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. (1994), ‘Economic Performance through Time’, American Economic Review, 84 (3): 359368.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K. (1957), ‘The Economy as Instituted Process’, in Polanyi, K., Arensberg, C. and Pearson, K. (eds.), Trade and Market in the Early Empires, Chicago: Gateway, pp. 243270.Google Scholar
Ramstad, Y. (1986), ‘A Pragmatist's Quest for Holistic Knowledge: The Scientific Methodology of John R. Commons’, Journal of Economic Issues, XX (4): 10671105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutherford, M. (1994), Institutions in Economics. The Old and the New Institutionalism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, W. (1999), ‘Hayek from the Perspective of an Institutionalist Historian of Economic Thought: An Interpretive Essay’, Journal des Économistes et des Études Humaines, IX (2/3): 279290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. (1991), ‘Organizations and Markets’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5 (2): 2544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Théret, B. (2001), ‘Saisir les faits économiques: la méthode Commons (Understanding the Economics Facts: the Commons Method)’, Cahiers d'économie politique, 40–41: 79137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Ven, A. (1993), ‘The Institutional Theory of John R. Commons: A Review and Commentary’, Academy of Management Review, 18 (1): 139152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, V. (1994), ‘Carl Menger's Evolutionary and John R. Commons's Collective Action Approach to Institutions: A Comparison’, in Vanberg, V. (ed.), Rules and Choice in Economics, London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanberg, V. (1997), ‘Institutional Evolution through Purposeful Selection: The Constitutional Economics of John R. Commons’, Constitutional Political Economy, 8 (2): 105122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walras, L. (1874), Éléments d'économie politique pure ou théorie de la richesse sociale (Elements of Pure Economics or the Theory of Social Wealth), Paris: LGDJ (Reprinted in 1952).Google Scholar