Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:43:37.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic sociology and institutional economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2007

DAVID A. REISMAN*
Affiliation:
Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, and University of Surrey, UK. Email: [email protected]

Abstract:

Economic sociology was a core concern of early political economists like Smith, Marx, Pareto, and Marshall. The new economic sociology has sought to revive the neglected subdiscipline using the construct of interpersonal networks. Richard Swedberg has assembled 42 substantial papers in this collection. This article, reviewing his selection, proceeds in three stages. First, it provides a general framework for the debate. Second, it discusses the papers specifically linked to networks. Third, it analyses the contributions that go beyond the concept of social processes as personal relationships.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The JOIE Foundation 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akerlof, G. A. 1984 [1970], ‘The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, in his An Economic Theorist's Book of Tales, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aspers, P. 2005 [2001], ‘A Market in Vogue: Fashion Photography in Sweden’, European Societies, 3: 122, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, R. 1986, ‘An Evolutionary Approach to Norms’, American Political Science Review, 80: 10951111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagehot, W. 1931 [1873)], Lombard Street, London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Baker, W. E. and Faulkner, R. R. 2005 [1993], ‘The Social Organization of Conspiracy: Illegal Networks in the Heavy Electrical Equipment Industry’, American Sociological Review, 58: 837–60, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1976, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 2005 [2000], ‘Making the Economic Habitus: Algerian Workers Revisited’, Ethnography, 1: 1741, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Burt, R. 1992, Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, B. G. and Espeland, W. N. 2005 [1991], ‘Accounting for Rationality: Double-Entry Bookkeeping and the Rhetoric of Economic Rationality’, American Journal of Sociology, 97: 3169, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlin, E. H. 1933, The Theory of Monopolistic Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1988 [1937], ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica, 4 in his The Firm, the Market, and the Law, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3355.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990, Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Commons, J. R. 1934, Institutional Economics, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cetina, K. K. and Bruegger, Urs 2005 [2002], ‘Global Microstructrures: The Virtual Societies of Financial Markets’, American Journal of Sociology, 107: 905950, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
David, P. A. 1985, ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review, 75: 332337.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F. 2005 [1991], ‘Agents without Principles? The Spread of the Poison Pill through the Intercorporate Network’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 583613, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. and Louch, H. 2005 [1998], ‘Socially Embedded Consumer Transactions: For What Kinds of Purchases Do People Most Often Use Networks?, American Sociological Review, 63: 619637, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Dobbin, F. 2005 [2001], ‘Why the Economy Reflects the Polity: Early Rail Policy in Britain, France, and the United States’, in Granovetter, M. and Swedberg, R. (eds), The Sociology of Economic Life, 2nd edn, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 401424, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Dore, R. 1983, ‘Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism’, British Journal of Sociology, 34: 459482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1964 [1893], The Division of Labour in Society, tr. by Simpson, G., New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. 2005 [1996], ‘Markets as Politics: A Political-Cultural Approach to Market Institutions’, American Sociological Review, 61: 656673, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Fourcade-Gourinchas, M. 2005 [2001], ‘Politics, Institutional Structures, and the Rise of Economics: A Comparative Study’, Theory and Society, 30: 397447, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galbraith, J. K. 1970 [1958], The Affluent Society, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1971 [1959], The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. 1981, ‘Response Cries’, in his Forms of Talk, Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, pp. 78123.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 1985, ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 481510.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. 2005 [1992], ‘Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology’, in Nohria, N. and Eccles, R. G. (eds), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Boston: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 2556, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Guseva, A and Rona-Tas, A. 2005 [2001], ‘Uncertainty, Risk, and Trust: Russian and American Credit Card Markets Compared’, American Sociological Review, 66: 623646, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. 1949, Individualism and Economic Order, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. M. 1994 [1993], ‘Institutional Economics: Surveying the “Old” and the “New”’, Metroeconomica, 44: 128, reprinted in G. M. Hodgson (ed.), The Economics of Institutions, Aldershot: Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keister, L. A. and Moller, S. 2005 [2000], ‘Wealth Inequality in the United States’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 6381, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. 1973 [1936], The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, in The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, Vol. 8, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Knight, F. 1957 [1921], Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, New York: Kelley & Millman.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, H. 1976a [1950], ‘Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 54, in his Beyond Economic Man, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 4867.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, H. 1976b [1966], ‘X-Efficiency versus Allocative Efficiency’, American Economic Review, 56, in his Beyond Economic Man, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 2947.Google Scholar
Lie, J. 2005 [1997], ‘Sociology of Markets’, Annual Review of Sociology, 23: 341360, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G. 2005 [2000], ‘Emotions in Economic Theory and Economic Behavior’, American Economic Review, 90: 426432, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M., Hirsch, P. M., and Klinkerman, S. 2005 [1998], ‘Institutional Upheaval and Performance Variation: A Theoretical Agenda and Illustration from the Deregulation of Commercial Banks’, Advances in Strategic Management, 15: 129146, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Mackenzie, D. and Millo, Y. 2005 [2003], ‘Constructing a Market Performing Theory: The Historical Sociology of a Financial Derivatives Market’, American Journal of Sociology, 109: 107145, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Marshall, A. 1949 [1890], Principles of Economics, 8th edn, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. 1990 [1924], The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, tr. by Halls, W. D., London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M. S. 2005 [1996], ‘What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates’, Annual Review of Sociology, 22: 271298, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Morris, M. and Western, B. 2005 [1999], ‘Inequality in Earnings at the Close of the Twentieth Century’, Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 623657, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Nee, V. 2005 [1989], ‘A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism’, American Sociological Review, 54: 663681, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. C. 2005 [1991], ‘Institutions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 97112, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. 1969, ‘The Relationship between Economics and the Other Social Sciences’, in Lipset, S. M. (ed.), Politics and the Social Sciences, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. and Smelser, N. J. 1956, Economy and Society, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M. and Page, K. L. 2005 [1998], ‘Network Forms of Organization’, Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 5776, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polanyi, K. 1957 [1944], The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Reisman, D. A. 2003, ‘Alfred Marshall on Social Capital’, in Arena, R. and Quéré, M. (eds), The Economics of Alfred Marshall: Revisiting Marshall's Legacy, London: Palgrave, pp. 5366.Google Scholar
Robbins, L. 1952 [1932], An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. 1933, The Economics of Imperfect Competition, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sachs, J. 2005 [2000], ‘Notes on a New Sociology of Economic Development’, in Harrison, L. E. and Huntington, S. P. (eds), Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress, New York, Basic Books, pp. 2943, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1947, Foundations of Economic Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saxenian, A. 2005 [1991], ‘The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley’, Research Policy, 20: 423–437, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1976 [1942], Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, 3rd edn, London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. 1964 [1932], ‘The Dimensions of the Social World’, in Collected Papers, Vol. II: Studies in Social Theory, ed. by Brodersen, A., The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 2005 [1997], ‘The Role of Organizations in an Economy’, in his An Empirically Based Microeconomics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3353, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Sitton, J. 2005 [1998], ‘Disembodied Capitalism: Habermas's Conception of the Economy’, Sociological Forum, 13: 6183, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Spilerman, S. 2005 [2000], ‘Wealth and Stratification Processes’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 497524, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. 2003, Principles of Economic Sociology, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. (ed.) 2005a, New Developments in Economic Sociology, 2 vols, Cheltenham: Elgar.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. 2005b, ‘Introduction’ to R. Swedberg 2005a, pp. x–xxi.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H. 2005 [1999], ‘The Sociology of Entrepreneurship’, Annual Review of Sociology, 25: 1946, in Swedberg (2005a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veblen, T. B. 1970 [1899], The Theory of the Leisure Class, London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Veblen, T. B. 1994 [1919], The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation and Other Essays, London: Routledge/Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1930 [1904–5], The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, tr. by Parsons, T., London: Unwin.Google Scholar
Weber, M. 1947 [1922], The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, tr. by Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, T., New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
White, H. C. 2005 [1997], ‘Varieties of Markets’, in Wellman, B. and Berkowitz, S. D. (eds), Social Structures: A Network Approach, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 226260, in Swedberg (2005a).Google Scholar
Williamson, O. 1975, Markets and Hierarchies, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar