Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:29:53.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Use of Di-n-Butyl Tin Dilaurate for Treatment of Chickens Experimentally Infected with Davainea proglottina*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

A. H. Abdou
A. H. Abdou
Affiliation:
From the Parasitology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Up to the present time no taeniacidal agent has been established on the basis of adequate evidence as satisfactory for the removal of tapeworms, especially Davainea proglottina, from poultry. Tapeworms are generally regarded as responsible for considerable damage to the poultry industry. The principal remedies that have been recommended are areca nut, turpentine, oil of chenopodium, extract of male fern, Kamala, pomegranate root bark, arecolin hydrobromide and thymol.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 30 , Issue 2-3 , October 1956 , pp. 121 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acharya, S. K., 1939.—“Experimental treatment of helminth parasitic infection of poultry with colloidal iodine or iodine vermicide.” Indian Vet. J. 16, 83–93. (W.L. 9959.)Google Scholar
Bayon, H. P., 1930.—“Common and preventable parasitic ailments of the domestic fowl. A contribution to the study of the hygiene of poultry.” Vet. Rec., 10, 1129–1142. (W.L. 22523.)Google Scholar
Bayon, H. P., 1944.—“Worms and how to treat them.” Poult. Fmg., Lond, 110 (2858). (W.L. 16410c.)Google Scholar
Guberlet, J. E., 1916.—“Studies on the transmission and prevention of cestode infection in chickens.“ J. Amer. vet. med. Ass., 49, 218–237. (W.L. 11022.)Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. E., and Harwood, P. D., 1941.—“Use of tin preparations for the treatment of chickens experimentally infected with tapeworms.” Amer. J. vet. Res., 2, 108–116. (W.L. 628a.)Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. E., and Harwood, P. D., 1944.—“Limited tests of mixtures of tin oleate with ammonium com pounds for the removal of experimental tapeworm infections of chickens.” Proc. helm. Soc. Wash., 11, 45–48. (W.L. 16747a.)Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. E., and Harwood, P. D., 1948.—“Phenyl mercuric compounds for the removal of tapeworms from poultry.” J. Parasit., 34 (6, Sec. 2), Suppl., 15. (W.L. 11428.)Google Scholar
Guthrie, J. E., Powick, W. C. & Bandel, D., 1941.—“Critical tests with tetra-alkyl tin compounds for the removal of Raillietina cesticillus from experimentally infected chickens.” N. Amer. Vet., 22, 22–24. (W.L. 15224.)Google Scholar
Hall, M. C. and Foster, W. D., 1918.—“Efficacy of some anthelmintics.” J. agric. Res., 12, 397–447. (W.L. 10966.)Google Scholar
Hall, M. C. and Shillinger, J. E., 1926.—“Kamala, a satisfactory anthelmintic for tapeworms in poultry.” N. Amer. Vet., 7, 51–58. (W.L. 15224.)Google Scholar
Kerr, K. B., 1948.—“Hexachlorophene as an agent for the removal of Raillietina cesticillus.” Poult. Sci., 27, 781–788. (W.L. 16421.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, P. P., 1938.—“Studies on the control of the poultry cestode Davainea proglottina (Dav.).” Cornell Vet., 28, 220–227. (W.L. 6888.)Google Scholar
Patterson, F. D., 1929.—“Common intestinal parasites of poultry.” Vet. Med., 24, 21–23. (W.L. 22520.)Google Scholar
Riley, W. A. & James, L. G., 1922.—“Life history and methods of control of the chicken nematode (Heterakis papulosa Bloch).” Rep. Minn. agric. Exp. Sta. 30th (1921–22). 70–71. (W.L. 18375a.)Google Scholar
Schlingman, A. S., 1926.—“Miscellaneous tests of tetrachlorethylene, a new anthelmintic.” J. Amer. vet. med. Ass., 68, 741–754. (W.L. 11022.)Google Scholar
Wickware, A. B., 1921.—“Studies on the use of anthelmintics in fowls.” J. Amer. vet. med. Ass., 59, 731–740.Google Scholar