Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:37:19.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some observations on hydatidosis in Jordan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2009

M. N. Abo-Shehada
M. N. Abo-Shehada
Affiliation:
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A total of 2.8% (5 of 176) sera from schoolchildren and university students were seropositive for hydatidosis (Echinococcus granulosus) by the ELISA IgEtest. The prevalence of seropositivity was 4·5% among females of all age groups (5–24 years) and among males of the age group 18–24 years. Males of the age group (5–17 years) were seronegative. The ratio of seropositivity between schoolboys and schoolgirl was 1:4. Sera collected from 1085 university students, aged 18–24 years, and from 1656 outpatients from northern and central Jordan, and the Jordan River valley, when tested by the IHA test, revealed the presence of antihydatid agglutinating antibodies in 5·16% (56 of 1085) and in 3·6% (60 of 1656) respectively, with a male to female infection ratio of 1:3 in the unviersity students and 1:1·1 in the outpatients. Intensity, prevalence and cyst fertility of E.granulosus increased increased in sheep with age. The results of this study indicate that hydatidosis is in an endemic steady state in Jordan with estimated economic losses if JD 3·0 (=US $ 4·4) per infected sheep.

Keywords

JordanmansheepEchinococcus granulosusHydatidosisCestodaepidemiology
Type
Research Note
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 67 , Issue 3 , September 1993 , pp. 248 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abdel-Hafez, S. K., Al-Yaman, F. M. & Said, I. M. (1986) Further studies on prevalence of hydatidosis is slaughtered animals from north Jordan. Zeitschrift für Pasasitenkunde, 72, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abo-Shehada, M. N. (1988) Prevalence of hydatidosis in donkeys from central Jordan. Veterinary Parasitology, 30, 125–130.Google Scholar
Abo-Shehada, M.N. (1989) Prevalence of Toxocara ova in some schools and public grounds in northern and central Jordan. Animals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 83, 73–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abo-Shehada, M. N. & Ziyadeh, Y. (1991) Prevalence of some endoparasites in faecal deposits in Jordan. Journal of Helminthology, 65, 313–314.Google Scholar
Ajlouny, A. Q., Saliba, E. K. & Disi, A.M. (1984) Intestinal cestodes of stray dogs in Jordan. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde, 70, 203–210.Google Scholar
Aoad (1984) Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics. Vo. 4, The Arab Organization for Agricultural Development, Khartoum, Sudan.Google Scholar
Bekhti, A., Schaaps, J. P., Capron, M., Dessaint, J. P., Santoro, F. & Capron, A. (1977) Treatment of hepatic hydatid disease with mebendazole: priliminary results in four cases. British Medical Journal, 2, 1047–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundy, D. A. F. (1988) Gender-dependent patterns of infection and disease. Parasitology Today, 4, 186–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dajani, Y. F. & Khalaf, F. H. (1981) Hydatidosis and tenuicolosis in sheep and goats of Jordan: a comparative study. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology, 75, 174–179.Google Scholar
Edwards, G. T. (1982) Observation on the epidemiology of equine hydatidosis in Britain. Veterinary Record, 110, 511–514.Google Scholar
El-Muhtaseb, H. H. (1984) Surgical management of hydatid cysts of the liver, retrospective study of 75 cases. Jordan Medical Journal, 18, 35–46.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A., Lawson, J. R. & Roberts, M. G. (1986) Control of echinococcosis/hydatidosis: present status of worldwide progress. Bulletin of the world Health Organization, 64, 333–339.Google ScholarPubMed
Herbert, W. J. (1973) Passive haemagglutination. In: Handbook of Experimental Immunology. (Editor Weir, D. M.) Chapter 20. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Jordan (1989) The Annual Report.Google Scholar
Picardo, N. G. A. & Guisantes, J. A. (1981) Comparison of three immunological tests for seroepidemiological purposes in human exhinococcosis. Parasite Immunology, 3, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rickard, M. D. & Lightowlers, M. W. (1986) Immunodiagnosis of hydatid disease. In: The Biology of Echinococcus and hydatid diseases. (Editor Thompson, R. C. A). pp. 217–249. George Allen & Unwin: London.Google Scholar
Roberts, M. G., Lawson, J. R. & Gemmell, M. A. (1986) Population dynamics in echinococcosis and cysticerosis: mathematical model of the life-cycle ofEchinococcus granulosus, Parasitology, 92, 621–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schantz, P. M., Shanka, D. & Wilson, M. (1980) Serologic cross-reaction with sera from patients with echiococcosis and cysticerosis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 29, 609–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varela-Diaz, V. M., Lopez-Lemes, M. H., Perzioso, U., Coltorti, E. A. & Yarzabal, L. A. (1975) Evaluation of four variants of the indirect hemagglutination test for Human hydatidosis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 24, 304–311Google Scholar