Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T01:16:13.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seasonal variation of Mastophorus muris (Nematoda: Spirurida) in the water vole Arvicola amphibius from southern Sweden

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2018

B. Neupane Open the ORCID record for B. Neupane [Opens in a new window] ,
A.L. Miller ,
A.L. Evans ,
G.E. Olsson  and
J. Höglund
B. Neupane*
Affiliation:
Tribhuvan University, Institute of Forestry, Department of Park Recreation and Wildlife Management, Pokhara, Nepal
A.L. Miller
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Section for Parasitology, Box 7036, Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden
A.L. Evans
Affiliation:
Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, Department of Forestry and Wildlife Management, Norway
G.E. Olsson
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Umeå, 901 83, Sweden
J. Höglund
Affiliation:
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences and Veterinary Public Health, Section for Parasitology, Box 7036, Uppsala, 750 07, Sweden
*
Author for correspondence: B. Neupane, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study focused on the spirurid nematode Mastophorus muris in water voles (Arvicola amphibius) trapped in three regions in southern Sweden during spring and fall 2013. The collection of water voles formed part of a larger project (EMIRO) on the cestode Echinococcus multilocularis in rodents. The voles’ stomach contents were examined for the presence of M. muris. Prevalence, mean abundance and mean intensity of infection were calculated. A generalized linear model model was used to examine the effects of sex, functional group, season and region on the number of M. muris individuals in each vole. Forty-seven of 181 (26%) voles were infected with M. muris, with up to 74 worms each. The overall mean intensity (worms per infected vole) was 15 (95% CI 10–21), and abundance (mean number of worms in all voles) was 4 (95% CI 2–6). Model output indicated a significant effect of season and region with respect to abundance of nematode infection, which was independent of sex and functional group of the investigated host.

Keywords

ArvicolaMastophorus murisnematodeseasonal variationwater vole
Type
Short Communication
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 94 , 2020 , e6
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Madi, MA et al. (2000) Seasonal and site specific variation in the component community structure of intestinal helminths in Apodemus sylvaticus from three contrasting habitats in south-east England. Journal of Helminthology 74, 7–15.Google Scholar
Barnard, CJ et al. (2002) Local variation in endoparasite intensities of bank voles (Clethrionomys glareolus) from ecologically similar sites: morphometric and endocrine correlates. Journal of Helminthology 76, 103–112.Google Scholar
Burlet, P, Deplazes, P and Hegglin, D (2011) Age, season and spatio-temporal factors affecting the prevalence of Echinococcus multilocularis and Taenia taeniaeformis in Arvicola terrestris. Parasites and Vectors 4, 1–9.Google Scholar
Charleston, WAG and Innes, JG (1980) Seasonal trends in the prevalence and intensity of spiruroid nematode infections of Rattus rattus. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 7, 141–145.Google Scholar
Forder, V (2006) Ecology and Conservation: The Water Vole Arvicola terrestris amphibius. http://www.wildwoodtrust.org.uk/files/water-voles-info.pdf (accessed 21 June 2017).Google Scholar
Grzybek, M et al. (2014) Female host sex-biased parasitism with the rodent stomach nematode Mastophorus muris in wild bank voles (Myodes glareolus). Parasitology Research 114, 523–533.Google Scholar
Haukisalmi, V, Henttonen, H and Tenora, F (1988) Population dynamics of common and rare helminths in cyclic vole populations. The Journal of Animal Ecology 57, 807–825.Google Scholar
Isakova, GK, Nazarova, GG and Evsikov, VI (2012) Early embryonic mortality in the water vole (Arvicola terrestris). Russian Journal of Developmental Biology 43, 244–247.Google Scholar
Jeppsson, B (1990) Effects of density and resources on the social system of water voles. In Tamarin, RH et al. (eds), Social Systems and Population Cycles in Voles. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser Basel, pp. 213–226.Google Scholar
Korslund, L and Steen, H (2006) Small rodent winter survival: snow conditions limit access to food resources. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 156–166.Google Scholar
Lafferty, KD et al. (2010) Stomach nematodes (Mastophorus muris) in rats (Rattus rattus) are associated with coconut (Cocos nucifera) habitat at Palmyra Atoll. Journal of Parasitology 96, 16–20.Google Scholar
Langley, R and Fairley, JS (1982) Seasonal variations in infestations of parasites in a wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus population in the west of Ireland. Journal of Zoology 198, 249–261.Google Scholar
Margolis, L et al. (1982) The use of ecological terms in parasitology (report of an ad hoc committee of the American Society of Parasitologists). The Journal of Parasitology 68, 131–133.Google Scholar
Melis, C et al. (2013) Genetic variability and structure of the water vole Arvicola amphibius across four meta-populations in northern Norway. Ecology and Evolution 3, 770–778.Google Scholar
Miller, AL et al. (2016a) First identification of Echinococcus multilocularis in rodent intermediate hosts in Sweden. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 5, 56–63.Google Scholar
Miller, AL et al. (2016b) Support for targeted sampling of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) feces in Sweden: a method to improve the probability of finding Echinococcus multilocularis. Parasites and Vectors 9, 1–11.Google Scholar
Miller, AL et al. (2017) Transmission ecology of taeniid larval cestodes in rodents in Sweden, a low endemic area for Echinococcus multilocularis. Parasitology 144, 1041–1051.Google Scholar
Montgomery, SSJ and Montgomery, WI (1988) Cyclic and non-cyclic dynamics in populations of the helminth parasites of wood mice, Apodemus sylvaticus. Journal of Helminthology 62, 78–90.Google Scholar
Myllymäki, A (1977) Interactions between the field of Microtus agrestis and its microtine competitors in Central Scandinavian populations. Oikos 29, 570–580.Google Scholar
Nazarova, GG and Evsikov, VI (2010) Growth rate, reproductive capacity, and survival rate of European water voles taken from natural populations at different phases of the population cycle. Russian Journal of Ecology 41, 322–326.Google Scholar
Potapov, MA et al. (2004) The effect of winter food stores on body mass and winter survival of water voles, Arvicola terrestris, in Western Siberia: the implications for population dynamics. Folia Zoologica 53, 37–46.Google Scholar
Quentin, JC (1970) Morphogénèse larvaire du spiruride Mastophorus muris (Gmelin, 1790). Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparee 45, 839–855.Google Scholar
Raoul, F et al. (2010) Predator dietary response to prey density variation and consequences for cestode transmission. Oecologia 164, 129–139.Google Scholar
Roberts, M et al. (1992) The effect of habitat on the helminth parasites of an island population of the Polynesian rat (Rattus exulans). Journal of Zoology 227, 109–125.Google Scholar
Rózsa, L, Reiczigel, J and Majoros, G (2000) Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. Journal of Parasitology 86, 228–232.Google Scholar
Smith, JA and Kinsella, JM (2011) Gastric spiruridiasis caused by Mastophorus muris in a captive population of striped possums (Dactylopsila trivirgata). Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine 42, 357–359.Google Scholar
Stoddart, DM (1970) Individual range, dispersion and dispersal in a population of water voles (Arvicola terrestris (L.). The Journal of Animal Ecology 39, 403–425.Google Scholar
Taberlet, P et al. (1998) Comparative phytogeography and postglacial colonization routes in Europe. Molecular Ecology 7, 453–464.Google Scholar
Theuerkauf, J et al. (2011) Efficiency of a new reverse-bait trigger snap trap for invasive rats and a new standardized abundance index. Annales Zoologici Fennici 48, 308–318.Google Scholar
Vukićević-Radić, O, Kataranovski, D and Kataranovski, M (2007) First record of Mastophorus muris (Gmelin, 1790) (Nematoda: Spiruroidea) in Mus musculus from the suburban area of Belgrade, Serbia. Archives of Biological Sciences 59, 1–2.Google Scholar
Wahlström, H et al. (2012) Investigations and actions taken during 2011 due to the first finding of Echinococcus multilocularis in Sweden. Eurosurveillance 17, 20215.Google Scholar
Wertheim, G (1962) A study of Mastophorus muris (Gmelin, 1790) (Nematoda: Spiruridae). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 81, 274–279.Google Scholar