Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T02:54:21.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Kalicephalus hongkongensis n.sp. from Elaphe moellendorffi and the Erection of a New Genus, Kalicephaloides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2009

Yeh Liang-Sheng
Yeh Liang-Sheng
Affiliation:
From the Department of Parasitology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two species of Kalicephalus are reported from snakes. K. indicus is found to be very common in the snake, Pytas mucosus in Canton, and K. hongkongensis sp.nov. is reported for Elaphe moellendorffi.

In a large number of species of Kalicephalus examined, a telamon was always found to be present.

The genus Occipitodontus is recognised as a valid one.

Kalicephalus minutus is made the genotype of a new genus Kalicephaloides on the basis of the unequal spicules and one of the terminal branches of the dorsal ray having its origin at the base of the dorsal ray.

Type
Research Papers
Information
Journal of Helminthology , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , December 1956 , pp. 203 - 210
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baylis, H. A., 1933.—“On a collection of nematodes from Malayan reptiles.” Ann. Mag. nat. Hist'. Ser. 10. 11, 615–633. (W.L. 1050).Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. and Daubney, R., 1922.—“Report on the parasitic nematodes in tho collection of the Zoological Survey of India.” Mem. Indian Mus. 7. 263–347. (W.L. 13401).Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. and Daubney, R., 1926.—“A synopsis of the families and genera of nematoda.” 277 pp. British Museum (Nat. Hist.) London.Google Scholar
Caballero, Y C. E., 1928.—“Nematodes parasites des reptiles du Mexique.” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 16, 327–333. (W.L. 899a).Google Scholar
Campana-ROUGET, Y. and Chabaud, A.G., 1950.—“Note sur quelques nematodes africains collection Camille Desportes.” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 25, 308–324.Google Scholar
Comroe, D. B., 1948.—“Kalicephalus conoidus n.sp. (Strongylata) a nematode from the rattlesnake Crotalus triseriatus”. Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc., 67, 280–284. (W.L. 21400a).Google Scholar
Daubney, R., 1923.—“Note on the genus Diaphanocephalus (Nematoda: Strongylidae), parasitic in reptiles, with a description of three new species.” Parasitology, 15, 67–74. (W.L. 10635).Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P., and Chabaud, A. G., 1949.—“Kalicephalus viperae (Rudolphi 1819) (Nematoda Strongyloidea): un parasite de serpents à ajouter à la faune de France.” Ann. Parasit. hum. comp., 24, 414–423. (W.L. 899a).Google Scholar
Harwood, P. D., 1932.—“The helminths parasitic in the amphibia and reptilia of Houston, Texas, and vicinity.” Proc. U.S. nat. Mus., 81, (Art. 17), 1–71. (W.L. 16944).Google Scholar
Harwood, P. D., 1934.—“Notes on Tennessee helminths. I. Kalicephalus tennesseensis n.sp. (Nematoda).” J. Tenn. Acad. Sci. 9, 192–194. (W.L. 11575c).Google Scholar
Hsu, H. F., 1934.—“On some Kalicephalus species from China with a discussion of certain systematic characters of the genus.” Peking nat. Hist. Bull. 8, 375–389. (W.L. 16087b).Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A., 1938.—“Beitrage zur Kenntnis parasitischer Nematoden VIII. Neue parasitische Nematoden aus dem Naturhistorischen Museum Basel.” Zbl. Bakt., 142. 329–352. (W.L. 23684).Google Scholar
Kreis, H. A., 1940.—“Beitrage zur Kenntnis parasitischer Nematoden IX. Parasitische Nematoden aus dem Naturhistorischen Museum Basel.” Zbl. Bakt., 145, 163–208.Google Scholar
Maplestone, P. A., 1931.—“Parasitic nematodes obtained from animals dying in the Calcutta zoological gardens. Parts 4–8.” Rec. Indian Mus. 33, 71–171. (W.L. 17746).Google Scholar
Maplestone, P. A., 1932.—“Parasitic nematodes obtained from animals dying in the Calcutta zoological gardens. Parts 4–8.” Parts 9–11 Rec. Indian Mus. 34, 229–261.Google Scholar
Reiber, R. J., Byrd, E. E. and Parker, M. V., 1940.—“Certain new and already known nematodes from amphibia and reptilia.” Lloydia 3, 125–144. (W.L. 12341b).Google Scholar
Wu, H. W. and Hu, Y. T., 1938.—“Parasitic nematodes from Hainan”. Sinensia 9, 275–297. (W.L. 20160e).Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S., 1935.—“Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 11 Reptilian nematodes.” Jap. J. Zool. 6, 393–402. (W.L. 10881w).Google Scholar